Psychosocial supports within pediatric nephrology practices: A pediatric nephrology research consortium survey.

BACKGROUND: The landscape of available psychosocial services within pediatric nephrology care is poorly characterized. However, the effects of kidney disease on emotional health and health-related quality of life are well documented, as is the impact of social determinants of health on kidney disease outcomes. The objectives of this study were to assess pediatric nephrologists' perceptions of available psychosocial services and to elucidate inequities in access to psychosocial care. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to members of the Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium (PNRC). Quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: We received responses from 49 of the 90 PNRC centers. With regards to dedicated services, social work was most commonly available (45.5-100%), followed by pediatric psychology (0-57.1%) and neuropsychology (0-14.3%), with no centers having embedded psychiatry. Availability of psychosocial providers was positively associated with nephrology division size, such that as center size increased, access to various psychosocial providers increased. Notably, the majority of respondents indicated that perceived need for psychosocial support exceeds that which is currently available, even at centers with higher levels of current support. CONCLUSIONS: Within the US, there is wide variability in the availability of psychosocial services within pediatric nephrology centers despite a well-documented necessity for the provision of holistic care. Much work remains to better understand the variation in funding for psychosocial services and in utilization of psychosocial professionals in the pediatric nephrology clinic, and to inform key best practices for addressing the psychosocial needs of patients with kidney disease.

The pressure's on: understanding neurocognitive and psychological associations with pediatric hypertension to inform comprehensive care.

The prevalence of hypertension is increasing in pediatric populations. While clinical data and practice guidelines identify the impact of hypertension on organ dysfunction and emphasize the importance for end-organ damage screening, the bidirectional effects of pediatric hypertension on neurocognitive and psychological outcomes are understudied. The objective of this review is to highlight the association between hypertension and cognition, attention, learning, and mental health in children and adolescents. In doing so, this review provides a framework and toolkit to integrate neuropsychology and psychology into the screening and management stages of pediatric hypertension. By recognizing the effects of hypertension on cognition, behavior, and mental health, screenings and interventions can be implemented to proactively and comprehensively improve the health outcomes for children with blood pressure concerns.

Feasibility of psychosis risk assessment for adolescents diagnosed with autism.

LAY ABSTRACT: Individuals with autism may experience a variety of psychiatric symptoms that may cause distress and difficulty functioning. The tools that exist to help evaluate symptoms for psychosis for individuals with autism are limited. We investigated whether a specialized interview for symptoms of psychosis risk could be used for adolescents with autism. We recruited 21 adolescents with autism and 22 typically developing adolescents and interviewed them using the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes. Participants were asked to rephrase interview questions as a way to understand how they interpreted the question. Their responses were evaluated by clinicians and third-party raters to determine potential response errors. Results of the study showed that youth with autism who have intact language skills are able to answer questions about psychosis risk symptoms as well as their typically developing peers. In general, adolescents across both groups who had more difficulty with nonliteral language (understanding words with multiple meanings) had more difficulty completing the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes. Problematic items that required more clarification by the clinician involved misinterpretation of words/phrases or questions. Care should be taken to ensure adolescents understand the intent of interviewer questions when assessing risk of psychosis.

Social and psychological contributions to the co-occurrence of sub-threshold psychotic experiences and suicidal behavior.

PURPOSE: Psychotic experiences and suicidal behavior commonly co-occur in the general population, which can have implications for suicide prevention approaches. However, little is known about the nature of this relation in non-clinical samples. This cross-sectional study aimed to address a research gap by testing whether the relation between psychotic experiences and suicide-related outcomes (ideation, intent, and attempts) is explained by common social and psychological factors. METHODS: Young adult college students (N = 590) were assessed for psychotic experiences, suicidal behavior, and a comprehensive set of 24 potential shared risk factors selected through review of past epidemiological studies and meta-analyses. Nonparametric bootstrapped regression models were used to examine whether these factors attenuated or eliminated the associations between psychotic experiences and suicide-related outcomes. RESULTS: Psychotic experiences were associated with greater risk for suicidal ideation and behaviors. Adjustment for psychosocial factors, particularly those contributing to cumulative stress, accounted for the associations between psychotic experiences and suicide-related outcomes, except broadly defined suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the robust associations between psychotic experiences and suicidal behavior demonstrated in past studies may be primarily explained by shared risk factors, rather than by causal relations. In our sample, suicidal behavior and sub-threshold psychosis appear to be trans diagnostic clinical outcomes that share common causes, notably cumulative stress, but do not cause one another.

Impact of Family History in Persons With Dual Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined relationships among family history of alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems and substance use severity, interpersonal relationships, and service use in individuals with dual diagnosis. METHODS: Data were collected with the family history section of the Addiction Severity Index administered as part of three studies of individuals with dual disorders (N=413). Participants were categorized into family history risk groups for each problem domain based on the number of first and second degree relatives with alcohol, drug, or psychiatric problems. RESULTS: Rates of alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems were high across family member categories and highest overall for siblings. Over two-thirds of the sample was categorized in the high-risk group in the alcohol problem domain, almost half of the sample was categorized as high-risk in the drug problem domain, and over a third of the sample was categorized as high-risk in the psychiatric problem domain. Across problem domains, individuals in the high-risk group reported more relationship problems with parents and siblings and higher rates of lifetime emotional, physical, and sexual abuse than did those in the low or moderate-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems is associated with greater rates of poor family relationships and history of abuse. Assessment of these different forms of family history in multiple family members can aid treatment providers in identifying individuals with dual disorders who may benefit from trauma-informed care as part of their overall mental health and substance abuse treatment services.