[Tapering of psychotropic drugs: current practice and needs of patients and their relatives]. / Deprescriptie van psychofarmaca; praktijk en behoeften van patiënten en naasten.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of mental illness has remained stable in recent decades, yet the use of psychotropic drugs has increased. This trend suggests that psychotropic drugs are being prescribed with an unnecessary frequency. Internationally, there is growing attention for deprescribing. AIM: To investigate what experiences and needs patients and their loved ones/relatives have with regard to deprescribing of psychotropics. METHOD: An online questionnaire was distributed among members of the MIND mental health care panel, which consists of (former) patients with a psychiatric disorder and their loved ones. RESULTS: A total of 564 respondents took part in this survey. Most patients have phased out/stopped their psychotropic drugs (83.8%). This was usually done at the initiative of the patient (66.7%), in consultation with the practitioner (72.9%). The practitioner only took the initiative to deprescribe in 15.1% of the cases. In 68.6% tapering was not discussed at the start of psychotropic drug use. Patients did not experience willingness from practitioners in deprescribing, and would like to discuss deprescribing more often (79.5%). CONCLUSION: There is an undeniable demand among patients and near ones for more emphasis on deprescribing of psychotropic drugs. We advise to include this topic in the shared decision making process.

Hospital physicians' and older patients' agreement with individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations in a clinical trial setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of hospital physicians and older patients with individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations from a pharmacotherapy team. METHODS: This study was embedded within a large European, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial examining the effect of a structured medication review on drug-related hospital admissions in multimorbid (≥ 3 chronic conditions) older people (≥ 70 years) with polypharmacy (≥ 5 chronic medications), called OPERAM. Data from the Dutch intervention arm of this trial were used for this study. Medication review was performed jointly by a physician and pharmacist (i.e. pharmacotherapy team) supported by a Clinical Decision Support System with integrated STOPP/START criteria. Individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations were discussed with patients and attending hospital physicians. RESULTS: 139 patients were included, mean (SD) age 78.3 (5.1) years, 47% male and median (IQR) number of medications at admission 11 (9-14). In total, 371 recommendations were discussed with patients and physicians, overall agreement was 61.6% for STOPP and 60.7% for START recommendations. Highest agreement was found for initiation of osteoporosis agents and discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors (both 74%). Factors associated with higher agreement in multivariate analysis were: female gender (+ 17.1% [3.7; 30.4]), ≥ 1 falls in the past year (+ 15.0% [1.5; 28.5]) and renal impairment i.e. eGFR 30-50 ml/min/1.73 m2; (+ 18.0% [2.0; 34.0]). The main reason for disagreement (40%) was patients' reluctance to discontinue or initiate medication. CONCLUSION: Better patient and physician education regarding the benefit/risk balance of pharmacotherapy, in addition to more precise and up-to-date medical records to avoid irrelevant recommendations, will likely result in higher adherence with future pharmacotherapy optimisation recommendations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration Number NCT02986425.

Monitoring of patients treated with lithium for bipolar disorder: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Adequate monitoring of patients using lithium is needed for optimal dosing and for early identification of patients with (potential) ADEs. The objective was to internationally assess how health care professionals monitor patients treated with lithium for bipolar disorder. METHODS: Using networks of various professional organizations, an anonymous online survey was conducted among health care professionals prescribing lithium. Target lithium serum levels and frequency of monitoring was assessed together with monitoring of physical and laboratory parameters. Reasons to and not to monitor and use of guidelines and institutional protocols, and local monitoring systems were investigated. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 117 health care professionals incorporating responses from twenty-four countries. All prescribers reported to monitor lithium serum levels on a regular basis, with varying target ranges. Almost all (> 97%) monitored thyroid and renal function before start and during maintenance treatment. Reported monitoring of other laboratory and physical parameters was variable. The majority of respondents (74%) used guidelines or institutional protocols for monitoring. In general, the prescriber was responsible for monitoring, had to request every monitoring parameter separately and only a minority of patients was automatically invited. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium serum levels, renal and thyroid function were monitored by (almost) all physicians. However, there was considerable variation in other monitoring parameters. Our results help to understand why prescribers of lithium monitor patients and what their main reasons are not to monitor patients using lithium.

Development of a nomogram for the estimation of long-term adherence to clozapine therapy using neutrophil fluorescence.

AIMS: Previously, we have reported an association between clozapine use and elevated FL3 neutrophil fluorescence, a flow-cytometric parameter for cell viability. Here, we developed and evaluated a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model relating FL3-fluorescence to clozapine exposure and derived a nomogram for estimation of long-term adherence. METHODS: Data from 27 patients initiating clozapine were analysed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A previously described pharmacokinetic model for clozapine was coupled to a FL3 fluorescence model. For this, an effect compartment with clozapine concentrations as input and a first order decay rate as output was linked with an Emax model to FL3-fluorescence. FL3-fluorescence was simulated for clozapine doses of 50, 150 and 400 mg daily (n = 10 000) to establish the nomogram. Finally, true simulated adherence (% of daily doses taken over 100 days) was compared to nomogram-estimated adherence to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: The half-life of FL3-fluorescence was estimated at 228 h (coefficient of variation 35%). Median absolute prediction errors of the nomogram in case of fully random adherence for 50, 150 and 400 mg ranged from -0.193% to -0.525%. The nomogram performed slightly worse in case of nonrandom adherence (median prediction error up to 5.19%), but was still clinically acceptable. Compliance patterns containing longer drug holidays revealed that the nomogram adequately estimates compliance over approximately the last 3 weeks prior to FL3-measurement. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram could provide information regarding long-term adherence based on prescribed clozapine dose and FL3-fluorescence. Future studies should further explore the clinical value of this biomarker and nomogram.

Therapy failure following selection of enfuvirtide-resistant HIV-1 in cerebrospinal fluid.

We report the selection of enfuvirtide-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in cerebrospinal fluid, resulting in subsequent loss of viral suppression in the plasma. This case report emphasizes the potential danger of low-level penetration of entry inhibitors into the central nervous system.

The association between concomitant use of serotonergic antidepressants and lithium-induced polyuria. A multicenter medical chart review study.

BACKGROUND: A previous study aimed at revealing the prevalence and determinants of lithium induced polyuria suggested an increased risk of polyuria (urine volume > or =3 L/24 h) in those using serotonergic antidepressants next to lithium. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to re-evaluate this secondary finding in another study population. METHODS: We performed a multicenter medical chart review study in patients using lithium in whom a 24-hour urine volume had been determined. RESULTS: We included 116 patients, twelve (26%)of the 46 patients with polyuria used serotonergic antidepressants compared to ten (14%) of the 70 patients without polyuria. We found an increased risk of polyuria in lithium users concurrently using serotonergic antidepressants (oddsratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval 1.00-8.21), adjusted for age, gender, use of antiepileptics and thyreomimetics. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the previous secondary finding of an increased risk of polyuria in patients using serotonergic antidepressants next to lithium. Physicians should take this into account when evaluating polyuria in patients using lithium and when choosing an antidepressant in patients using lithium.

Changes in outpatient lithium treatment in the Netherlands during 1996-2005.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present study were to investigate in outpatients in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2005, changes in 1) the incidence and prevalence of lithium use and 2) lithium use patterns (discontinuation, add-on, and switch). METHODS: Incidence and prevalence of lithium use were determined for each year between 1996 and 2005. In addition, we determined cumulative changes in lithium use (discontinuation, add-on, and switching) at three, six, 12 and 24 months for three separate time-cohorts (1998-1999, 2000-2001 and 2002-2003). Lastly, concomitant use of other drugs used in the treatment of bipolar disorders next to lithium during the 24 months after the first lithium prescription was determined for the three time-cohorts. RESULTS: Incidence of lithium use was constant at approximately 0.2 per 1000 person-years, prevalence increased with 26% from 0.95 to 1.2 per 1000 persons. The percentage of patients receiving an add-on drug used in the treatment of bipolar disorders was constant over the three time-cohorts, with a significant decrease in use of tricyclic antidepressants. Within the patient group that stopped using lithium, more patients switched from lithium to another agent used in the treatment of bipolar disorders over calendar time, and fewer patients discontinued lithium. There was a significant increase in the use of atypical antipsychotics and valproic acid next to lithium. LIMITATIONS: We did not know the specific diagnosis for which lithium treatment was instituted. CONCLUSION: The changes were in line with the increase in alternatives during the last decade and in line with Dutch guidelines.

Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte.

Despite initial enthusiasm, the use of pharmacogenetics has remained limited to investigation in only a few clinical fields such as oncology and psychiatry. The main reason is the paucity of scientific evidence to show that pharmacogenetic testing leads to improved clinical outcomes. Moreover, for most pharmacogenetic tests (such as tests for genetic variants of cytochrome P450 enzymes) a detailed knowledge of pharmacology is a prerequisite for application in clinical practice, and both physicians and pharmacists might find it difficult to interpret the clinical value of pharmacogenetic test results. Guidelines that link the result of a pharmacogenetic test to therapeutic recommendations might help to overcome these problems, but such guidelines are only sparsely available. In 2001, an early step was taken to develop such guidelines for the therapeutic use of antidepressants, and these included CYP2D6-related dose recommendations drawn from pharmacokinetic study data. However, the use of such recommendations in routine clinical practice remains difficult, because they are currently outside the ambit of the clinical environment and are not accessible during the decision-making process by physicians and pharmacists, namely the prescription and dispensing of drugs.

[Effect of gastric banding on pharmacotherapy: not much known]. / Invloed van een maagband op farmacotherapie: nog weinig bekend.

Following placement of gastric banding, the time that medication remains in the proximal part of the stomach may increase variably. This can lead to problems with oral administration of enteric coated or controlled-release preparations. Problems can be avoided by changing over to another form ofa dministration or sometimes by changing to another active compound. The placement of a gastric band changes the size of the stomach opening and the volume of the functional part of the stomach. Other than oral tablets, alternative formulations of medication, such as liquid or rectal forms are not always available, sometimes the only solution for giving some medication is to ground the tablet finely into powder for oral administration. For tablets with enteric coating or controlled release changing to normal tablets is not always perceivable. Patients should receive adequate instructions for intake and information on their therapy so that they do not fail to comply with treatment if tablets have a nasty taste after being ground into powder. The fat and water balance of both obese patients and patients who are losing weight is not usually known. Patients who have gastric banding should have medication dosages especially for medication with a narrow therapeutic index followed under strict supervision and have regular blood tests so that any necessary dosage adjustments can be made. At present little data are available to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of gastric banding on pharmacotherapy. The potential consequences ofgastric banding on pharmacotherapy, together with the increasing frequency of gastric banding surgery, emphasize the need for further research in this field.

[Oculotoxic and dermatotoxic side effects of phenothiazines]. / Oculotoxische en dermatotoxische bijwerkingen bij gebruik van fenothiazinen.

Phenothiazines can give rise to serious and sometimes irreversible dermatological and oculotoxic side effects. These effects can take the form of photosensitivity, grey-purple discoloration and hyperpigmentation of the skin and hyperpigmentation of the conjunctiva, cornea, lens, retina, choroidea and macula. Involvement of the retina or macula can lead to impaired vision, blurred vision, disturbed colour perception and night blindness. We describe the mechanisms that are currently believed to underlie these side-effects. We advise annual ophthalmic monitoring of patients receiving long-term treatment with phenothiazianes.