RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Distal femur fractures are common injuries that remain difficult for orthopedic surgeons to treat. High complication rates, including nonunion rates as high as 24% and infection rates of 8%, can lead to increased morbidity for these patients. Allogenic blood transfusions have previously been identified as risk factors for infection in total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion surgeries. No studies have explored the relationship between blood transfusions and fracture related infection (FRI) or nonunion in distal femur fractures. METHODS: 418 patients with operatively treated distal femur fractures at two level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics were collected including age, gender, BMI, medical comorbidities, and smoking. Injury and treatment information was also collected including open fracture, polytrauma status, implant, perioperative transfusions, FRI, and nonunion. Patients with less than three months of follow up were excluded. RESULTS: 366 patients were included in final analysis. One hundred thirty-nine (38%) patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. Forty-seven (13%) nonunions and 30 (8%) FRI were identified. Allogenic blood transfusion was not associated with nonunion (13% vs 12%, P = 0.87), but was associated with FRI (15% vs 4%, P<0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis identified a dose dependent relationship between number of perioperative blood transfusions and FRI: total transfusion ≥2 U PRBC RR= 3.47(1.29, 8.10, P = 0.02), ≥3 RR= 6.99 (3.01, 12.40, P<0.001), and ≥4 RR= 8.94 (4.03, 14.42, P<0.001). DISCUSSION: In patients undergoing operative treatment of distal femur fractures, perioperative blood transfusions are associated with increased risk of fracture related infection, but not the development of a nonunion. This risk association increases in a dose-dependent relationship with increasing total blood transfusions received.
Assuntos
Fraturas Femorais Distais , Fraturas do Fêmur , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Consolidação da FraturaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: High energy tibial plateau fractures are fraught with complications, particularly fracture-related infection (FRI). Previous studies have evaluated patient demographics, fracture classification, and injury characteristics as risk factors for FRI in patients with these injuries. This study evaluated the relationship between radiographic parameters (fracture length relative to femoral condyle width (FLF ratio), initial femoral displacement (FD ratio), and tibial widening (TW ratio)) and fracture-related infection following internal fixation in high energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: 225 patients treated for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures at two level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, fracture classification, and radiographic measurements were analyzed to determine association with FRI. RESULTS: The rate of FRI was 13.8%. Increased fracture length, FLF ratio, FD ratio, TW ratio, and fibula fracture were each associated with FRI on regression analysis, independent of clinical variables. Cutoff values were identified for each parameter and patients were risk stratified based on these radiographic parameters. High-risk patients had a 2.68- and 12.36-times risk of FRI compared to medium and low-risk patients, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to examine the relationship between radiographic parameters and FRI in high energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Fracture length, FLF ratio, FD ratio, TW ratio, and fibula fracture were identified as radiographic parameters associated with FRI. More importantly, risk stratifying patients based on these parameters accurately identified patients at increased risk of FRI. Not all bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are created equal and radiographic parameters can be utilized to help identify the bad actors.
Assuntos
Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas do Planalto Tibial , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , TíbiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: External fixator pin site overlap with definitive fixation implants (pin-plate overlap) has been identified as a risk factor for surgical site infection in tibial plateau fractures. Despite this, pin-plate overlap occurs in 24-38% of patients. This study sought to identify radiographic characteristics associated with pin-plate overlap to help minimize occurrences. METHODS: 283 patients at two Level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic measurements were recorded including fracture length, distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site, and pin site distance-to-fracture (PSF) ratio. RESULTS: 70 (24.7%) cases of pin-plate overlap were identified. Pin-plate overlap was associated with increased fracture length (81.5 ± 32.1 mm vs 56.9 ± 26.1 mm, p < 0.001) and decreased distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site (84.5 ± 37.1 mm vs 126.9 ± 35.8 mm). Pins placed greater than 100 mm and 150 mm from the fracture eliminated 36/70 (51%) and 67/70 (96%) pin-plate overlaps, respectively. Pins placed with a PSF ratio greater than 1.5 and 2.0 eliminated 47/70 (67%), and 57/70 (81%) of pin-plate overlaps, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer fractures, pins closer to the fracture, and decreased PSF ratio were associated with overlap. Placing proximal tibial pins more than 100 mm from the fracture eliminated most pin-plate overlaps.
Assuntos
Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas do Planalto Tibial , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fixadores Externos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in the treatment of high energy proximal tibia fractures, including the utilization of staged management with external fixation, the infection rate remains high. Overlap between external fixator pin sites and definitive internal fixation has been proposed as a risk factor for infection. METHODS: This retrospective study reviews 244 patients with staged knee-spanning external fixation followed by delayed definitive internal fixation at two separate level one trauma centers. Presence of pin-plate overlap as well as several other known risk factors for infection were recorded and measured to include open fractures, compartment syndrome, operative time and number of incisions. Development of deep infection was the primary outcome. Both univariate and multivariate statistics were applied to determine differences in rates of infection. RESULTS: 65 (26.6%) patients had presence of pin-plate overlap while 179 (73.4%) patients had no overlap. There were no differences between overlapping and non-overlapping groups with respect to other infectious risk factors. Deep infection occurred in 34 (13.9%) total patients, 18 (27.7%) were in patients with pin-plate overlap and 16 (8.9%) in those without overlap. (P = 0.003; RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.51-4.76). DISCUSSION: This large, multicenter study demonstrated a statistically significant association between pin-plate overlap and the development of deep infection in tibial plateau fractures. On multivariate analysis, pin-plate overlap was identified as an independent risk factor for infection. When treating these complex injuries, surgeons should consider the definitive fixation construct when placing external fixation pins.
Assuntos
Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/complicações , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed the time frame for their definition of deep surgical site infection (SSI) from within 1 year to within 90 days of surgery. We hypothesized that a substantial number of infections in patients who have undergone fracture fixation present beyond 90 days and that there are patient or injury factors that can predict who is more likely to present with SSI after 90 days. METHODS: A retrospective review yielded 452 deep SSI after fracture fixation. These patients were divided into two groups-those infected within 90 days of surgery and those infected beyond 90 days . Data were collected on risk factors for infection. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the two groups. A randomly selected control group was used to build infection prediction models for both outcomes. The two outcomes were then modelled against each other to determine whether differences in predictors for early versus late infection exist. RESULTS: Of the 452 infections, 144 occurred beyond 90 days (32% [95% CI, 28%-36%]). No statistically significant patient factors were found in multivariable analysis between the early and late infection groups. The need for flap coverage was the only injury characteristic that differed significantly between groups, with patients in the late infection group more likely to have needed a flap. When modelled against the control group and directly comparing the two models, predictors for early infection include male sex and fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, or hip, whereas predictors of late infection include hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSION: Use of the recent CDC definition will underestimate the rate of actual postoperative infections when applied to orthopaedic trauma patients. Hepatitis C and/or HIV and ICU admission are predictors of late infection, whereas male sex and pelvis, acetabulum, or hip fractures are predictors of early infection. Patients who receive flap coverage may be more likely to present with late infection.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Ortopedia , Acetábulo/lesões , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL and surgical site infection in orthopaedic trauma surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, case control study. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty-five nondiabetic, noncritically ill orthopaedic trauma patients with an extremity, pelvic, or acetabular fracture and requiring open reduction and internal fixation or intramedullary nailing. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ninety-day deep surgical site infection. RESULTS: Admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL was significantly associated with the primary outcome (8/128, 6.3% vs. 35/337, 1.8%; P = 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression modeling demonstrated that admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL was a significant risk factor for deep surgical site infections [odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-15.7], after controlling for male gender (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1), prior drug or alcohol abuse (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.0), open fracture (OR: 6.4, 95% CI 3.7-11.0), and fracture region (upper extremity OR: reference; pelvis/hip OR: 3.9, 95% CI 1.6-9.7; femur OR: 2.0, 95% CI 0.88-4.8; tibia/ankle OR: 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.2; and foot OR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.3). CONCLUSIONS: Admission glucose ≥200 mg/dL was a significant independent risk factor for 90-day deep surgical site infections in orthopaedic trauma patients and may serve as an important marker for infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas , Hiperglicemia , Ortopedia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologiaRESUMO
This study sought to determine (1) whether surgeons can accurately predict functional outcomes of operative fixation of pilon fractures based on injury and initial postoperative radiographs, (2) whether the surgeon's level of experience is associated with the ability to successfully predict outcome, and (3) the association between patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and surgeons' prediction scores. A blinded, randomized provider survey was conducted at a level I trauma center. Seven fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists and 4 orthopedic trauma fellows who were blinded to outcome reviewed data regarding 95 pilon fractures in random order. Injury ankle radiographs, initial postoperative fixation radiographs, and brief patient histories were assessed. Midterm follow-up functional outcome scores obtained a mean 4.9 years after surgery were available for all patients. Main outcome measures were Pearson correlation coefficient-assessed functional outcomes and surgeon-predicted outcomes. A mixed-effect model determined the association between patients' characteristics and surgeons' prediction scores. Minimal positive correlation was observed between functional outcomes and prediction scores. No difference was noted between the attending and fellow groups in prediction ability. When surgeons' prediction confidence level was greater than 1 SD above the mean confidence level, correlation between functional outcome and prediction improved, although poor correlation was still observed. AO/OTA type 43C fractures, high-energy mechanisms, and older patient age were characteristics associated with lower prediction scores. Surgeons had poor ability to predict functional outcomes of patients with pilon fractures based on injury and initial postoperative radiographs, and level of experience was not associated with ability to predict outcome. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1): e43-e46.].
Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine factors predictive of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after fracture fixation and create a prediction score for risk of infection at time of initial treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Study group, 311 patients with deep SSI; control group, 608 patients. INTERVENTION: We evaluated 27 factors theorized to be associated with postoperative infection. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to build a prediction model. A composite score reflecting risk of SSI was then created. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of postoperative infection. RESULTS: The final model consisted of 8 independent predictors: (1) male sex, (2) obesity (body mass index ≥ 30) (3) diabetes, (4) alcohol abuse, (5) fracture region, (6) Gustilo-Anderson type III open fracture, (7) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal swab testing (not tested or positive result), and (8) American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Risk strata were well correlated with observed proportion of SSI and resulted in a percent risk of infection of 1% for ≤3 points, 6% for 4-5 points, 11% for 6 to 8-9 points, and 41% for ≥10 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed postoperative infection prediction model might be able to determine which patients have fractures at higher risk of infection and provides an estimate of the percent risk of infection before fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Disruption of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an infrequent but devastating complication. Presently, limited data exists regarding the optimal treatment and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent reconstruction of their knee extensor mechanism using Achilles tendon allograft following TKA between January 2003 and January 2012 were identified. Sixteen patients with 17 reconstructions (10 patellar tendons, 7 quadriceps tendons) were studied. All patients underwent evaluation at an average of 45.7 months. Ten of the patients were followed to an average of 65.4 months. RESULTS: After reconstruction, the average extensor lag was 6.6° and average knee flexion was 105.1°. Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of two years and an average follow-up of 65.4 months, the average extensor lag and knee flexion was 8.4° and 107.9°, respectively, with quadriceps strength maintained at an average of 4/5. The quadriceps tendon reconstructions had an average extensor lag and flexion of 2.9° and 103°, respectively. The patellar tendon reconstructions, excluding one re-rupture, had an average extensor lag and flexion of 9.6° and 105.1°, respectively. Four patients died during the follow-up period. All but one of the patients were below the mean for age-matched controls on the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction is a reliable and durable treatment for patients who sustain not only patellar tendon ruptures, but also quadriceps tendon ruptures following TKA. Despite the success of this technique, the injury and procedure have a profound impact on overall function.
Assuntos
Tendão do Calcâneo/transplante , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ligamento Patelar/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Músculo Quadríceps/fisiopatologia , Músculo Quadríceps/cirurgia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruptura/etiologia , Ruptura/cirurgia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/etiologia , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful prediction model of success at the time of surgery to promote bone healing for established tibial nonunion or traumatic bone defects. DESIGN: Retrospective case controlled. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult patients treated with surgery for established tibia fracture nonunion or traumatic bone defects from 2007 to 2016. Two hundred three patients met the inclusion criteria and were available for final analysis. INTERVENTION: Surgery to promote bone healing of established tibia fracture nonunion or segmental defect with plate and screw construct, intramedullary nail fixation, or multiplanar external fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of the surgery to promote bone healing that was defined as unplanned revision surgery for lack of bone healing or deep infection. No patients were excluded who had a primary outcome event. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic modeling identified 5 significant (P < 0.05) risk factors for failure of the surgery to promote bone healing: (1) mechanism of injury, (2) Increasing body mass index, (3) cortical defect size (mm), (4) flap size (cm), and (5) insurance status. A prediction model was created based on these factors and awarded 0 points for fall, 17 points for high energy blunt trauma (OR = 17; 95% CI, 1-286, P = 0.05), 22 points for industrial/other (OR = 22; 95% CI, 1-4, P = 0.04), and 28 points for ballistic injuries (OR = 28; 95% CI, 1-605, P = 0.04). One point is given for every 10 cm of flap size (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1-1.1, P < 0.001), 10 mm of mean cortical gap distance (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1-2, P = 0.004), and 10 units BMI, respectively (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1-3, P = 0.16). Two points are awarded for Medicaid or no insurance (OR = 2; 95% CI, 1-5, P = 0.035) and 3 points for Medicare (3; 95% CI, 1-9, P = 0.033). Each 1-point increase in risk score was associated with a 6% increased chance of requiring at least 1 revision surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a clinical score that predicts the likelihood of success after surgery for tibia fracture nonunions or traumatic bone defects and may help clinicians better determine which patients are likely to fail these procedures and require further surgery.
Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Rejeição de Enxerto , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Transplante Ósseo/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Suspensory femoral fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts with fixed loop button and variable loop button devices has gained popularity for ACL reconstruction. This study examined these 2 methods of fixation to determine their effect on graft laxity and patient-reported outcome scores. A database search was performed to identify patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with either a fixed loop or a variable loop button technique performed by the primary surgeon. Lysholm, Tegner, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores were obtained, and KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, California) mechanical knee testing was performed. Results were compared with the uninjured knee. Of the 112 patients who were identified, 91 met the study criteria. Of these patients, 57 completed KT-1000 knee testing, 33 in the variable group and 24 in the fixed group. The average KT-1000 value for the variable group was 0.38 mm, and the average for the closed group was 0.92 mm (P=.19; 95% confidence interval, -0.28 to 1.35). Among the 19 patients in the variable group and the 13 in the closed group who completed the subjective outcomes questionnaires, no statistically significant difference was found. Clinically lax knees (KT-1000>3 mm) were found in 6.1% and 12.5% of patients in the variable group and the fixed group, respectively (P=.2). The variable group had a rerupture rate of 4.7%, whereas the fixed group had a rerupture rate of 8.7% (P=.21). The study found no statistical difference in ACL graft laxity or postoperative functional outcomes between grafts fixed with the variable loop or fixed loop button technique. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e275-e280.].