Determinants of visual acuity outcomes in eyes with neovascular AMD treated with anti-VEGF agents: an instrumental variable analysis of the AURA study.

PurposeTo identify the strongest variable(s) linked with the number of ranibizumab injections and outcomes in AURA, and to identify ways to improve outcomes using this association.MethodsAURA was a large observational study that monitored visual acuity over a 2-year period in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who received ranibizumab injections. Baseline characteristics, resource use, and outcomes were analyzed using an instrumental variable approach and regression analysis.ResultsData were analyzed from 2227 patients enrolled in AURA. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ophthalmoscopy were the most common diagnostic tests used, and this combination was the strongest instrumental variable. Use of OCT and ophthalmoscopy affected the number of injections given and resulted in an increase in visual acuity gains from baseline of 17.6 letters in year 1 and 2.5 letters in year 2. Regression models using the instrumental variable (OCT and ophthalmoscopy combined) showed that ≥5.1 (95% CI: 3.3-11.4) ranibizumab injections were needed to maintain visual acuity from baseline to year 1 and ≥8.3 (95% CI: 5.3-18.8) injections were needed to maintain visual acuity from year 1 to year 2. To gain ≥15 letters, ≥7.9 (95% CI: 5.1-17.5) ranibizumab injections would be needed in year 1 and ≥16.1 (95% CI: 10.3-36.4) injections would be needed over 2 years.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the role that regular monitoring plays in guiding neovascular AMD therapy and they showed that the number of ranibizumab injections needed to maintain visual acuity is higher than that administered in AURA.

Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in the elderly: an update for 10 Western European countries.

Pneumococcal vaccine is effective in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease in adults >or=65 years of age, but it is not widely used in Western Europe. In this study, data from an earlier (1995) cost-effectiveness study on Belgium, France, Scotland, Spain, and Sweden are updated, and data on five new countries--Denmark, the UK (specifically, England and Wales), Germany, Italy and The Netherlands--are added. Epidemiological and economic variables specific for each country were used, and it was assumed that pneumococcal and influenza vaccines would both be administered during the same physician visit. In the base-case analyses, the cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from euro 9239 to euro 23,657 per quality-adjusted life-year. Because the incidence and mortality of invasive pneumococcal disease were underestimated in most countries, a country-by-country analysis was performed, assuming an incidence of 50 cases per 100,000 population and mortality rates of 20, 30 and 40%. For a mortality of 20%, the cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from euro 4,778 to euro 17,093, and for a mortality of 30%, they ranged from euro 3,186 to euro 11,395. Pneumococcal vaccination to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease in elderly adults was very cost-effective in all 10 countries. This evidence justifies the wider use of the vaccine in Western Europe.

Evaluation of the association between the EQ-5D (health-related utility) and body mass index (obesity) in hospital-treated people with Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes and with no diagnosed diabetes.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of body mass index (BMI) on health-related utility for patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. METHODS: The study was conducted in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, UK. Health-related utility was measured using the EQ-5D(index). Patients from the Health Outcomes Data Repository (HODaR) were surveyed by postal questionnaire either 6 weeks post discharge for in-patients or at out-patient clinics between January 2002 and July 2003. BMI was calculated from self-reported data within the survey. Patients with diabetes were identified by a previous history of an in-patient admission with diabetes or as an out-patient with diabetes recorded as a coexisting diagnosis. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 27 924 patients of whom 2575 had diabetes. Increasing BMI was found to reduce utility in all three groups. BMI was significantly greater for those with Type 2 diabetes compared with those with Type 1, and those without diabetes (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that both BMI and diabetes status had a significant effect on utility. However, the rate of change of utility attributable to BMI was not found to be significantly different between the various groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity negatively impacts upon health-related utility and thus quality of life for all patient groups. There was no significant difference in the effect of obesity on utility between those with and without diabetes.