Clinical Development of a Cytomegalovirus DNA Vaccine: From Product Concept to Pivotal Phase 3 Trial.

2013 marks a milestone year for plasmid DNA vaccine development as a first-in-class cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA vaccine enters pivotal phase 3 testing. This vaccine consists of two plasmids expressing CMV antigens glycoprotein B (gB) and phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) formulated with a CRL1005 poloxamer and benzalkonium chloride (BAK) delivery system designed to enhance plasmid expression. The vaccine's planned initial indication under investigation is for prevention of CMV reactivation in CMV-seropositive (CMV⁺) recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 proof-of-concept study provided initial evidence of the safety of this product in CMV⁺ HCT recipients who underwent immune ablation conditioning regimens. This study revealed a significant reduction in viral load endpoints and increased frequencies of pp65-specific interferon-γ-producing T cells in vaccine recipients compared to placebo recipients. The results of this endpoint-defining trial provided the basis for defining the primary and secondary endpoints of a global phase 3 trial in HCT recipients. A case study is presented here describing the development history of this vaccine from product concept to initiation of the phase 3 trial.

Preclinical evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety of plasmid DNA-based prophylactic vaccines for human cytomegalovirus.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) establishes a lifelong persistent infection characterized by periods of latency and sporadic viral replication and is a major infectious cause of birth defects following congenital infection. Currently, no licensed vaccine is available that would prevent CMV infection. In an effort to develop a prophylactic CMV vaccine, the effects of different formulations, immunization routes and delivery devices on the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA (pDNA)-based vaccines were evaluated in rabbits and mice. Compared with PBS- and poloxamer-based formulations, significantly higher antibody responses were obtained with pDNA formulated with Vaxfectin (®) , a cationic lipid-based adjuvant. With low vaccine doses, the intradermal (ID) route resulted in higher antibody responses than obtained when the same dose was administered intramuscularly (IM). Since the IM route allowed injection of larger volumes and higher doses than could be administered at a single ID site, better antibody responses were obtained using the IM route. The needle-free injection system Biojector (®) 2000 and electroporation devices enhanced antibody responses only marginally compared with responses obtained with Vaxfectin (®) -formulated pDNA injected IM with a needle. A single-vial Vaxfectin (®) formulation was developed in a dosage form ready for use after thawing at room temperature. Finally, in a GLP-compliant repeat-dose toxicology study conducted in rabbits, single-vial Vaxfectin (®) -formulated vaccines, containing pDNA and Vaxfectin (®) up to 4.5 mg and 2 mg/injection, respectively, showed a favorable safety profile and were judged as well-tolerated. The results support further development of a Vaxfectin (®) -formulated pDNA vaccine to target congenital CMV infection.

A novel therapeutic cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs within 6 months in 60-70% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), mainly due to immunosuppression associated with the procedure. Pre-emptive antiviral therapy reduces incidence of cytomegalovirus disease but can be toxic. To reduce the potential for disease and subsequent need for such antiviral drugs, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine compared with placebo. METHODS: In this exploratory double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase 2 trial, up to 80 donor-recipient pairs and 80 unpaired recipients undergoing allogeneic HSCT were planned for enrolment at 16 transplant centres in the USA. Eligible recipients were cytomegalovirus-seropositive, 18-65 years old, without high-risk primary disease, T-cell depletion, previous vaccination for cytomegalovirus, or autoimmune diseases. We randomly allocated participants in both parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine (TransVax; Vical, San Diego, CA, USA) or placebo before conditioning and at 1, 3, and 6 months after transplantation. The vaccine contains plasmids encoding cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B and phosphoprotein 65 formulated with poloxamer CRL1005 and benzalkonium chloride. Randomisation was done by sequential allocation based on Pocock and Simon's method, and stratified by site, donor-recipient HLA matching status, and donor's cytomegalovirus serostatus. The primary outcome was the occurrence rate of clinically significant viraemia resulting in initiation of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy in the per-protocol assessable population. We assessed rates of adverse events in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00285259. FINDINGS: We randomly allocated 108 participants (94 HSCT recipients and 14 paired donors) between June 29, 2006, and Dec 11, 2009. Enrolment of the paired arm was halted in February 2008 for logistical reasons. Safety was assessed in all participants; the efficacy population was restricted to 74 unpaired recipients. Groups were balanced for demographic and clinical variables. 19 (48%) of 40 vaccine recipients required cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy, compared with 21 (62%) of 34 controls (p=0·145). However, during follow-up vaccine significantly reduced the occurrence and recurrence of cytomegalovirus viraemia and improved the time-to-event for viraemia episodes compared with placebo. The vaccine was well-tolerated; only one participant discontinued after an allergic reaction. Incidence of common adverse events after HSCT (eg, graft-versus-host disease or secondary infections) did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: We show proof of concept for an immunotherapeutic cytomegalovirus vaccine (TransVax) for clinically significant viraemia in the HSCT setting. The reported safety and efficacy outcomes support further development in a phase 3 trial, notwithstanding a lack of significant reduction in the use of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy compared with placebo in this phase 2 trial. FUNDING: Vical and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Phase 1 clinical trials of the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccines encoding influenza A virus H5 hemagglutinin.

BACKGROUND: Development of vaccines against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 subtypes posing a pandemic threat remains a priority. Limitations in manufacturing capacity and production time of conventional inactivated vaccines highlight the need for additional approaches. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies involving a total of 103 healthy adults who received two intramuscular injections of Vaxfectin-adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccine or placebo 21 days apart. Vaccine cohorts received either a monovalent vaccine containing an A/Vietnam/1203/04 H5 hemagglutinin-encoding plasmid or a trivalent vaccine with plasmids encoding H5, NP, and M2 proteins in doses from 0.1 to 1mg of DNA/injection. RESULTS: All doses were well tolerated without vaccine-related serious adverse events or discontinuations. In the monovalent cohorts, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers of > or =40 and 4-fold rises from baseline were achieved in 47-67% of subjects and H5-specific T-cell responses in 75-100%. Trivalent cohorts had lower HI response rates (< or = 20%), but 72% of subjects achieved T-cell and/or antibody responses to one or more antigens. CONCLUSIONS: Vaxfectin-adjuvanted monovalent H5 DNA vaccines were well tolerated and induced HI response rates and titers in the reported range of inactivated protein-based H5 vaccines, suggesting that adjuvanted DNA vaccines with rapid vaccine production could be useful for pandemic control.

A CMV DNA vaccine primes for memory immune responses to live-attenuated CMV (Towne strain).

CMV-seronegative subjects vaccinated intramuscularly or intradermally with a DNA vaccine encoding pp65, IE1, and gB were administered live-attenuated CMV (Towne) to characterize immune priming by the DNA vaccine. CMV-specific memory T-cells (detected by standard ELISPOT assay in only 20% of subjects) were detected by IFN-gamma cultured ELISPOT assay in 60% of subjects primed intramuscularly and correlated with immune responses after Towne. The median time to first pp65 T-cell and gB antibody response after Towne was 14 days for DNA-primed subjects vs. 28 days for controls administered Towne only (p=0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, there was a trend toward more DNA-vaccinated subjects than controls developing a gB-specific IFN-gamma T-cell response after Towne administration (47% vs. 0%, p=0.06).

Safety and immunogenicity of a bivalent cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: VCL-CB01, a candidate cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA vaccine that contains plasmids encoding CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) and glycoprotein B (gB) to induce cellular and humoral immune responses and that is formulated with poloxamer CRL1005 and benzalkonium chloride to enhance immune responses, was evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial. METHODS: VCL-CB01 was evaluated in 44 healthy adult subjects (22 CMV seronegative and 22 CMV seropositive) 18-43 years old. Thirty-two subjects received 1- or 5-mg doses of vaccine on a 0-, 2-, and 8-week schedule, and 12 subjects received 5-mg doses of vaccine on a 0-, 3-, 7-, and 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Overall, the vaccine was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. Local reactions included mild to moderate injection site pain and tenderness, induration, and erythema. Systemic reactions included mild to moderate malaise and myalgia. All reactions resolved without sequelae. Through week 16 of the study, immunogenicity, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay and/or ex vivo interferon (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay, was documented in 45.5% of CMV-seronegative subjects and in 25.0% of CMV-seropositive subjects who received the full vaccine series, and 68.1% of CMV-seronegative subjects had memory IFN-gamma T cell responses at week 32. CONCLUSION: The safety and immunogenicity data from this trial support further evaluation of VCL-CB01.

A DNA vaccine against dolphin morbillivirus is immunogenic in bottlenose dolphins.

The immunization of exotic species presents considerable challenges. Nevertheless, for facilities like zoos, animal parks, government facilities and non-profit conservation groups, the protection of valuable and endangered species from infectious disease is a growing concern. The rationale for immunization in these species parallels that for human and companion animals; to decrease the incidence of disease. The U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program, in collaboration with industry and academic partners, has developed and evaluated a DNA vaccine targeting a marine viral pathogen - dolphin morbillivirus (DMV). The DMV vaccine consists of the fusion (F) and hemagglutinin (H) genes of DMV. Vaccine constructs (pVR-DMV-F and pVR-DMV-H) were evaluated for expression in vitro and then for immunogenicity in mice. Injection protocols were designed for application in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to balance vaccine effectiveness with clinical utility. Six dolphins were inoculated, four animals received both pDMV-F and pDMV-H and two animals received a mock vaccine (vector alone). All animals received an inoculation week 0, followed by two booster injections weeks 8 and 14. Vaccine-specific immune responses were documented in all four vaccinated animals. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pathogen-specific immunogenicity to a DNA vaccine in an aquatic mammal species.

Novel microneutralization assay for HCMV using automated data collection and analysis.

In addition to being sensitive and specific, an assay for the assessment of neutralizing antibody activity from clinical trial samples must be amenable to automation for use in high-volume screening. To that effect, we developed a 96-well microplate assay for the measurement of HCMV-neutralizing activity in human sera using the HCMV-permissive human cell line HEL-299 and the laboratory strain of HCMV AD169. The degree to which neutralizing antibodies diminish HCMV infection of cells in the assay is determined by quantifying the nuclei of infected cells based on expression of the 72 kDa IE1 viral protein. Nuclear IE1 is visualized using a highly sensitive immunoperoxidase staining and the stained nuclei are counted using an automated ELISPOT analyzer. The use of Half Area 96-well microplates, with wells in which the surface area of the well bottom is half the area of a standard 96-well microplate plate, improves signal detection compared with standard microplates and economizes on the usage of indicator cells, virus, and reagents. The staining process was also streamlined by using a microplate washer and data analysis was simplified and accelerated by employing a software program that automatically plots neutralization curves and determines NT(50) values using 4-PL curve fitting. The optimized assay is not only fast and convenient, but also specific, sensitive, precise and reproducible and thus has the characteristics necessary for use in measuring HCMV-neutralizing activity in the sera of vaccine trial subjects such as the recipients of Vical's HCMV pDNA vaccine candidates.