T3N0 Rectal Cancer: Radiation for All, None, or Some?

ABSTRACT: The optimal management of T3N0 rectal cancer is an area of active debate that has withstood multiple decades of research. In this comprehensive review, we delve into the many nuances that come with treating T3N0 rectal cancer, particularly examining the role and evolution of radiation therapy. We review both the historical paradigms and latest advances in treatment and highlight the significance of precise preoperative staging. As the field continues to evolve, this review highlights a shift toward more tailored treatments, considering both patient goals and the desire for optimal oncologic outcomes. In the current era, clinical decision-making for T3N0 rectal cancer requires a patient-centric approach that balances effective therapy while minimizing undue side effects.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Is Associated With Worse Survival in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiotherapy (RT)-related lymphopenia, its predictors, and association with survival in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated-RT (HF-RT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 96 patients with unresectable ICC who underwent HF-RT (median 58.05 Gy in 15 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir within 12 weeks of RT was analyzed. Primary variable of interest was severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3+ (ALC <0.5 k/µL) per CTCAE v5.0. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from RT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16 months. Fifty-two percent of patients had chemotherapy pre-RT, 23% during RT, and 40% post-RT. Pre-RT, median ALC was 1.1 k/µL and 5% had severe lymphopenia. Post-RT, 68% developed RT-related severe lymphopenia. Patients who developed severe lymphopenia had a significantly lower pre-RT ALC (median 1.1 vs. 1.5 k/µL, P =0.01) and larger target tumor volume (median 125 vs. 62 cm 3 , P =0.02). In our multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of death ( P =0.04); 1-year OS rates were 63% vs 77% ( P =0.03). Receipt of photon versus proton-based RT (OR=3.50, P =0.02), higher mean liver dose (OR=1.19, P <0.01), and longer RT duration (OR=1.49, P =0.02) predicted severe lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS: HF-RT-related lymphopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with unresectable ICC. Patients with lower baseline ALC and larger tumor volume may be at increased risk, and use of proton therapy, minimizing mean liver dose, and avoiding treatment breaks may reduce RT-related lymphopenia.

A Multi-Institutional Survey of Radiation Oncology Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Behaviors Toward Sexual and Gender Minority Patients With Cancer.

Purpose: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals have an increased risk of poor health outcomes, in part due to knowledge and training gaps in health care education. This study sought to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviors of various health care role groups within radiation oncology toward SGM patients. Methods and Materials: A 38-item web-based survey was emailed to 1045 staff across 2 large radiation oncology departments. The survey assessed demographics, attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors. χ2 tests were performed to explore differences in survey responses by age, political affiliation, religious identity, year since graduation, and role groups. One-way analysis of variance tests were conducted to determine differences between respondents' confidence in knowledge and performance on the knowledge section of the survey. Thematic analysis was applied to the open discussion section. Results: Of the 223 respondents, 103 clinicians (physicians/advanced practice providers/nurses) and 120 nonclinicians (administrative staff, medical assistants, and other nonmedical staff) participated in the survey (21.3% response rate): 72.6% answered the knowledge questions; 93.5% stated they were comfortable treating sexual minorities, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer + patients; 88% indicated comfort in treating transgender patients; 36.6% stated they were confident in their knowledge of the health needs of transgender patients; and 50.3% expressed confidence in treating lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer + patients. Fewer nonclinicians than clinicians thought that gender identity, sexual orientation, and sex assigned at birth were important to provide the best care (P < .05). The open comments section identified key themes, including the belief that current educational tools are not helpful, desire for more educational formats (lectures, case-based learning, seminars), and an overall interest in SGM health education. Conclusions: Most staff feel comfortable in treating SGM patients but are less confident in the distinct needs of this population. Knowledge gaps persist for both clinicians and nonclinicians, indicating a need for further training specific to oncology care.

Role of Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: While surgery is the primary curative treatment for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, rates of locoregional and distant recurrence remain high with surgery alone, especially in more advanced disease. Multimodal approaches with perioperative therapy including chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT) have thus evolved as ways to reduce the rates of disease recurrence and improve survival outcomes. This review article provides a comprehensive literature review on the role of preoperative RT for resectable gastric and GEJ cancer. METHODS: A literature review on the role of preoperative RT for resectable gastric and GEJ cancer was conducted. RESULTS: Preoperative RT has the potential to facilitate tumor downstaging and improved R0 resection, allowing for better locoregional control and thereby survival. For resectable locally advanced GEJ cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is currently a standard of care option along with perioperative chemotherapy, based on evidence from randomized trials. In resectable gastric cancer, however, the role of preoperative CRT is less defined with no randomized data to date, although phase II single-arm studies have shown promising results. Current standard of care for gastric cancer remains perioperative chemotherapy, with consideration for preoperative CRT in select cases. CONCLUSION: Results from ongoing and future randomized controlled trials are expected to help define the role of preoperative CRT compared to perioperative chemotherapy alone as well as postoperative CRT for gastric and GEJ cancer.

Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus.

PURPOSE: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a highly effective treatment in select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system does not recommend the use of EBRT in HCC due to a lack of sufficient evidence and intends to perform an individual patient level meta-analysis of ablative EBRT in this population. However, there are many types of EBRT described in the literature with no formal definition of what constitutes "ablative." Thus, we convened a group of international experts to provide consensus on the parameters that define ablative EBRT in HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fundamental parameters related to dose, fractionation, radiobiology, target identification, and delivery technique were identified by a steering committee to generate 7 Key Criteria (KC) that would define ablative EBRT for HCC. Using a modified Delphi (mDelphi) method, experts in the use of EBRT in the treatment of HCC were surveyed. Respondents were given 30 days to respond in round 1 of the mDelphi and 14 days to respond in round 2. A threshold of ≥70% was used to define consensus for answers to each KC. RESULTS: Of 40 invitations extended, 35 (88%) returned responses. In the first round, 3 of 7 KC reached consensus. In the second round, 100% returned responses and consensus was reached in 3 of the remaining 4 KC. The distribution of answers for one KC, which queried the a/b ratio of HCC, was such that consensus was not achieved. Based on this analysis, ablative EBRT for HCC was defined as a BED10 ≥80 Gy with daily imaging and multiphasic contrast used for target delineation. Treatment breaks (eg, for adaptive EBRT) are allowed, but the total treatment time should be ≤6 weeks. Equivalent dose when treating with protons should use a conversion factor of 1.1, but there is no single conversion factor for carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS: Using a mDelphi method assessing expert opinion, we provide the first consensus definition of ablative EBRT for HCC. Empirical data are required to define the a/b of HCC.