Risk of RSV-related hospitalization is associated with gestational age in preterm (born at 29-34 wGA) infants without outpatient palivizumab administration.

Palivizumab has been shown to decrease RSV-related hospitalization (RSVH) risk and reduce RSVH severity. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidance on administration of palivizumab has changed over time; in 2014, palivizumab was no longer recommended in preterm infants born at 29 weeks gestational age (wGA) or later. This study's objective was to describe RSVH risk and severity in preterm infants (29-34 wGA) without comorbidities relative to healthy term infants and to each other by gestational age. Using the MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid and Commercial Databases, infants born from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019, at 29-34 wGA (preterm) and >37 wGA (term) were identified. During RSV seasons (November to March) from 2014 to 2020, claims incurred by infants while they were <6 months old were evaluated for RSVH and RSVH characteristics. This study included 63,351 preterm infants and 1,076,389 term infants without outpatient palivizumab administration. Rate of RSVH was higher in infants with lower wGA at birth and ranged 3.32-5.72 per 100 infant-seasons in Medicaid-insured infants and 3.21-4.84 in commercially insured infants. Relative risk of RSVH was 5-8 times higher in Medicaid-insured preterm infants and 3-5 times higher in commercially insured preterm infants compared to term infants. ICU admissions and mechanical ventilation were more common during RSVH in preterm infants relative to term infants. RSV-related outpatient healthcare utilization was also 2-3 times higher in preterm infants born at 31-34 wGA. Increased utilization of palivizumab among infants born at 29-34 wGA may decrease RSVH rates and result in less severe course in preterm infants with RSVH.

Effectiveness and Safety of Palivizumab for the Prevention of Serious Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Palivizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of serious lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and young children at high risk of RSV disease. This systematic review summarized evidence on the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab when used in approved populations. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of Phase III trials and observational studies was conducted according to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, setting (PICOTS) approach (PROSPERO, CRD42021281380). Target populations consisted of infants with a history of premature birth (≤35-week gestational age) and children aged <2 years with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (hs-CHD). Outcomes of interest included RSV-related hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), requirement for mechanical ventilation, treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and RSV-related deaths. Information sources were literature search (Ovid MEDLINE and Embase), pragmatic searches, and snowballing (covering the period up to 07 September 2021). RESULTS: A total of 60 sources were included (5 Phase III trials and 55 observational studies). RSV-related hospitalization rates following palivizumab prophylaxis in Phase III trials were 1.8% in premature infants and 7.9% in children with BPD, which were significantly lower than rates in placebo arms. In the real-world setting, similar hospitalization rates were found (0.7-4.0% in premature infants [16 studies] and 0-5.5% in patients with BPD [10 studies]) with ICU admission reported in 0 to 33.3% of patients hospitalized for RSV. In Phase III trials, RSV-related mortality rates were 0.2 and 0.3%, while AEs occurred in 11% of premature and/or BPD patients and 7.2% of hs-CHD patients, consisting mainly of injection site reaction, fever, and diarrhea. Similar results were found in observational studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review supports the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab in the indicated populations. KEY POINTS: · Systematic review supports the positive benefit-risk profile of palivizumab in the indicated populations.. · Real-world safety and effectiveness of palivizumab are consistent with Phase III trials results.. · Palivizumab reduces RSV-related hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and need for mechanical ventilation..

RSV-related hospitalization and outpatient palivizumab use in very preterm (born at <29 wGA) infants: 2003-2020.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in children under one year and a leading cause of infant hospitalization. Palivizumab was approved by the FDA in 1998 as RSV immunoprophylaxis to prevent severe RSV disease in children with specific health conditions and those born at <35 weeks gestational age (wGA). This study compared RSV-related hospitalization (RSVH) and RSVH characteristics in very preterm (<29 wGA) and term (>37 wGA) infants. Using the MarketScan Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid administrative claims databases, infants born between 7/1/2003 and 6/30/2020 were identified and classified as very preterm or term. Infants with evidence of health conditions, such as congenital heart disease and cystic fibrosis, were excluded. During 2003-2020 RSV seasons (November to March), claims incurred by infants while they were <12 months old were evaluated for outpatient administration of palivizumab and RSVH. The study included 40,123 very preterm infants and 4,421,942 term infants. Rate of RSVH in very preterm infants ranged 1.5-3.8 per 100 infant-seasons in commercially insured infants and 3.5-8.4 in Medicaid insured infants and were inversely related to wGA at birth. Relative risk of RSVH in very preterm was 3-4 times higher, and ICU admissions and mechanical ventilation were more common during RSVH in very preterm infants relative to term infants. However, these outcomes were less common or less severe in very preterm infants who received outpatient palivizumab administration, despite evidence of higher baseline risk of RSVH in these infants.

Adults with immune thrombocytopenia who switched to avatrombopag following prior treatment with eltrombopag or romiplostim: A multicentre US study.

Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may respond to one thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) but not another. Limited data are available describing outcomes in patients who switched from romiplostim or eltrombopag to avatrombopag, a newer oral TPO-RA. We performed a retrospective observational study of adults with ITP who switched from eltrombopag or romiplostim to avatrombopag at four US tertiary ITP referral centres. Forty-four patients were included, with a mean ITP duration of 8.3 years and a median (range) of four prior ITP treatments. On avatrombopag, 41/44 patients (93%) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /l) and 38/44 patients (86%) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /l). In all patients, the median platelet count on eltrombopag or romiplostim was 45 × 109 /l vs 114 × 109 /l on avatrombopag (p < 0.0001); in patients switched for ineffectiveness of romiplostim/eltrombopag, it was 28 × 109 /l on romiplostim/eltrombopag vs 88 × 109 /l on avatrombopag (p = 0.025). Fifty-seven percent of patients receiving concomitant ITP medications before switching discontinued them after switching, including 63% of patients receiving chronic corticosteroids. In a heavily pretreated chronic ITP population, avatrombopag was effective following therapy with romiplostim or eltrombopag, with high response rates even in patients with inadequate response to a prior TPO-RA.