Radiotherapy in palliation of thoracic tumors: a phase I-II study (SHARON project).

The main clinical goal for patients with advanced or metastatic thoracic cancer is palliation of tumor-related symptoms and improvement of quality of life. The aim of this phase I-II trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a short-course of palliative radiotherapy (RT) and to evaluate its efficacy in terms of palliative response. A phase I trial was planned with escalating dose increments. Total doses ranged from 16 to 20 Gy delivered (BID) in two consecutive days. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as any acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity based on the RTOG scale. MTD was used in the phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen using a two stage Simon's design. Fifty-four patients were enrolled. The upper dose level of 20 Gy was defined as the MTD. In patients treated with this dose, the overall palliative response rate was 96.5% (CI 0.95: 81.3-99.9%). Complete pain relief rate was 50.0%. Median survival without symptomatic progression was 3 months. The tested short course accelerated regimen was well tolerated and effective in the palliative setting of metastatic or locally advanced chest cancer. A phase III trial is ongoing to validate this RT schedule.Trial registration: NCT03465553.

Incidence and management of noncancer pain in cancer patients referred to a radiotherapy center.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of noncancer pain (NCP) in cancer patients is unknown. An analysis of incidence, severity, impact on quality of life (QoL), and appropriateness of NCP treatment in a cohort of cancer patients referred to a radiotherapy center is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pain was scored from 0 (absence) to 3 (severe) and the adequacy of analgesic therapy was evaluated according to International Guidelines. Correlation between Pain Management Index and World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder was used to analyze the appropriateness of NCP treatment. In addition, pain was differentiated according to its origin and types and a comparison was performed between cancer pain (CP) and NCP. RESULTS: A total of 903 patients were eligible and 865 (95.8%) were considered evaluable. Three hundred ninety-eight patients (46.0%) had pain. CP and NCP pain incidence was 11.2% and 34.8%, respectively. Pain intensity was higher in patients with CP versus NCP (P=0.021). A neuropathic pain lower incidence (P=0.024) in NCP versus CP was recorded. Moreover, NCP was more inadequately treated than CP (P<0.001). QoL was significantly lower in patients with NCP when compared with patients without pain (P<0.001). In addition, QoL of patients with CP was significantly lower than QoL of patients with NCP (P<0.001). DISCUSSION: In a cancer patients' population referred to a radiotherapy center, the NCP incidence was higher than the CP incidence and NCP intensity was only slightly lower than CP. NCP was significantly pharmacologically undertreated and it was related to a decline in QoL.