Contrasting Some Differences in Managing Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between the East and the West.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, although its aetiologies vary significantly between the East and the West. About a half of HCC cases present with advanced unresectable HCC at the time of diagnosis, leading to a worse prognosis. Over the past 20 years, the treatment paradigm for advanced unresectable HCC has shifted from an entirely palliative approach to a multidisciplinary treatment, with continuous reassessment and possible repeat treatment attributed to the advent of novel and improved local, regional and systemic therapeutic options, contributed by both the East and the West. An individualised treatment plan should be determined for each patient, as there can be substantial differences in the decision-making and treatment response to the same treatment for different patients and different patient populations. This review provides a summary of the recent advances in management and compares Eastern and Western strategies for HCC.

Hepatitis B Vaccination in Patients Receiving Oral Antiviral Therapy Without Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin After Liver Transplant.

Our study aimed to determine if a double-dose pre-S containing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination (Sci-B-Vac) could elicit an adequate and sustainable immune response in HBV patients who developed spontaneous hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) response after liver transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who received transplants for HBV-related disease for >1 year with normal graft function and hepatitis B surface antigen seronegativity were evaluated. They received a 40-µg HBV vaccine if they were responders in our previous vaccine trial, if anti-HBs was positive for >1 year after liver transplant (LT), or if a peak anti-HBs at any time point after LT was >100 mIU/mL. Primary endpoint was the development of anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL from previous negative value or a 1-log increase from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were recruited; 5 were responders from a previous trial; 45 patients had detectable anti-HBs >1 year after LT, and 36 patients had an anti-HBs >100 mIU/mL. All (5/5, 100%) previous responders responded to booster vaccination. For the remaining 81 patients, 10 of 81 (12.3%) responded. CONCLUSION: All previous responders responded to booster vaccination, implying durability and memory of HBV immune response, which is an important prerequisite for definitive host immunity for HBV. In patients who had spontaneous anti-HBs production after LT, a single vaccination can induce response in 12.3% of patients.

Randomized clinical trial of hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are treatment options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether tumour recurrence and long-term survival favour either treatment has not been established. This randomized trial aimed to test the hypothesis that RFA is superior to hepatic resection in terms of lower tumour recurrence rate and better long-term survival. METHODS: Patients with early-stage HCC (solitary tumour no larger than 5 cm; or no more than 3 tumours, each 3 cm or smaller) were randomized into hepatic resection and RFA groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics, and short- and long-term outcome measures were compared between groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures were overall tumour recurrence and survival respectively. RESULTS: Clinicopathological data were similar in the two groups, which each contained 109 patients. The RFA group had a shorter treatment duration, less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than the resection group. Mortality and morbidity rates were similar in the two groups. The overall tumour recurrence rate was similar in the resection and RFA groups (71·3 versus 81·7 per cent respectively). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94·5, 80·6, 66·5 and 47·6 per cent respectively in the resection group, compared with 95·4, 82·3, 66·4 and 41·8 per cent in the RFA group (P = 0·531). Corresponding disease-free survival rates were 74·1, 50·9, 41·5 and 31·9 per cent in the resection group, and 70·6, 46·6, 33·6 and 18·6 per cent in the RFA group (P = 0·072). CONCLUSION: RFA for early-stage HCC is not superior to hepatic resection, in terms of tumour recurrence, overall survival and disease-free survival. Registration number: HKUCTR-10 (http://www.hkuctr.com).

Case Report of Relay Liver Transplantation With Graft Infected With Hepatitis B Virus.

Reuse of liver graft for transplantation is extremely uncommon. We report the 1st case of reuse of liver graft from a recipient who had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, 11 years after the 1st transplantation. Our relay liver transplantation challenged conventional thinking because of late reuse of graft in the presence of HBV infection. Moreover, both the 1st and the 2nd donors were of advanced age. The key questions were whether the liver graft could be reused safely, especially in the setting of HBV infection, and technical concerns during organ procurement and implantation. The absence of HBV replication was confirmed with negative hepatitis B surface antigen and undetectable serum HBV DNA in the 2nd donor. Based on our experience in managing HBV infection after liver transplantation, we were confident that the adequately suppressed HBV infection in the donor would not jeopardize graft function and that the graft would be able to withstand another ischemia-perfusion injury to continue to function well in our recipient.