Unilateral Spatial Neglect May Not Be Detected by Performance-Based Functional Neglect Assessment.

IMPORTANCE: Unilateral spatial neglect (neglect) poststroke is disabling. It is critical that people with neglect are identified so that treatment can be provided to maximize independence. However, there is some evidence to suggest that existing assessments may not adequately measure neglect. It is unclear whether assessments also fail to identify people with neglect entirely. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are stroke survivors who self-report neglect symptoms that are not detected by therapist-rated assessments and to compare self-report and therapist-ratings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: U.S. university research center. PARTICIPANTS: Unilateral stroke survivors (N = 133). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was administered to participants and scored by a trained occupational therapist. The parallel self-evaluation anosognosia form was also administered to participants to self-report and rate neglect symptoms. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants (36.1%) were classified as without neglect on the basis of therapist-rated total CBS scores, yet 30 (62.5%) of these 48 participants reported symptoms of neglect on the CBS self-evaluation anosognosia form. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between therapist-rated and self-rated total CBS scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results indicate that many stroke survivors report some level of disability associated with neglect yet do not meet the criteria to be classified as having neglect according to a commonly used therapist-rated performance-based measure. Plain-Language Summary: The findings of this study contribute to the evidence that existing assessments used by occupational therapists to measure performance-based neglect may not always detect neglect symptoms comprehensively in people poststroke. The finding also suggest that we may be missing neglect symptoms entirely. Occupational therapists should consider using various methods to assess for neglect, including patient self-report and comprehensive occupational profiles. Clinicians should also thoroughly screen all clients with stroke for neglect, regardless of lesion location.

Motor Activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Neuromodulation Approach for Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), when synchronized with post-stroke motor rehabilitation improves conventional motor rehabilitation training. A non-invasive VNS method known as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerves stimulation (taVNS) has emerged, which may mimic the effects of implanted VNS. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether taVNS paired with motor rehabilitation improves post-stroke motor function, and whether synchronization with movement and amount of stimulation is critical to outcomes. METHODS: We developed a closed-loop taVNS system for motor rehabilitation called motor activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) and conducted a randomized, double-blind, pilot trial investigating the use of MAAVNS to improve upper limb function in 20 stroke survivors. Participants attended 12 rehabilitation sessions over 4-weeks, and were assigned to a group that received either MAAVNS or active unpaired taVNS concurrently with task-specific training. Motor assessments were conducted at baseline, and weekly during rehabilitation training. Stimulation pulses were counted for both groups. RESULTS: A total of 16 individuals completed the trial, and both MAAVNS (n = 9) and unpaired taVNS (n = 7) demonstrated improved Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 5.00 ± 1.02, unpaired taVNS: 3.14 ± 0.63). MAAVNS demonstrated greater effect size (Cohen's d = 0.63) compared to unpaired taVNS (Cohen's d = 0.30). Furthermore, MAAVNS participants received significantly fewer stimulation pulses (Mean ± SEM, MAAVNS: 36 070 ± 3205) than the fixed 45 000 pulses unpaired taVNS participants received (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This trial suggests stimulation timing likely matters, and that pairing taVNS with movements may be superior to an unpaired approach. Additionally, MAAVNS effect size is comparable to that of the implanted VNS approach.

Combined Aerobic Exercise and Virtual Reality-Based Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Intervention for Chronic Stroke: Feasibility and Preliminary Effects on Physical Function and Quality of Life.

Objectives: To (1) examine the feasibility of combining lower extremity aerobic exercise (AEx) with a virtual reality (VR) upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation intervention and (2) provide an estimate of effect size for the combined intervention on UE function, aerobic capacity, and health-related quality of life. Design: Single-group feasibility trial. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Community-dwelling individuals with mild to moderate impairment of the UE at least 6 months post stroke (N=10; male, n=6; female n=4; mean age, 54 years). Intervention: All participants received 18 sessions over a nominal 2-3 sessions per week schedule of a combined AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation intervention. During each session, participants completed 15 minutes of lower extremity AEx followed by playing a VR-UE rehabilitation game for approximately 20 minutes. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility was evaluated by metrics of adherence, retention, treatment acceptability, data completeness, and adverse events. UE function, aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption [Vo2peak]), and quality of life were assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), expired gas exchange analysis, and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), respectively. Results: Adherence was 100%, and there were no withdrawals or losses to follow-up to report. Participants completed the intervention in 49±14 days. Cohen's dz effect size calculations indicated the intervention elicited medium effects on FMA-UE (dz =0.50) and SIS memory domain (dz =0.46) and large effects on absolute Vo2peak (dz =1.46), relative Vo2peak (dz =1.21), SIS strength (dz =1.18), and SIS overall recovery domains (dz =0.81). Conclusions: Combining lower extremity AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation appears feasible in the clinical research setting. Fifteen minutes of lower extremity AEx performed at vigorous intensity appears to elicit clinically meaningful benefits in chronic stroke. Further examination of the combination of lower extremity AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation and its effects on physical function and quality of life is warranted.

Concomitant sensory stimulation during therapy to enhance hand functional recovery post stroke.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke hand impairment is prevalent and persistent even after a full course of rehabilitation. Hand diminishes stroke survivors' abilities for activities of daily living and independence. One way to improve treatment efficacy is to augment therapy with peripheral sensory stimulation. Recently, a novel sensory stimulation, TheraBracelet, has been developed in which imperceptible vibration is applied during task practice through a wrist-worn device. The objective of this trial is to determine if combining TheraBracelet with hand task practice is superior to hand task practice alone. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial will be used. Chronic stroke survivors will undergo a standardized hand task practice therapy program (3 days/week for 6 weeks) while wearing a device on the paretic wrist. The device will deliver TheraBracelet vibration for the treatment group and no vibration for the control group. The primary outcome is hand function measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test. Other outcomes include the Box and Block Test, Action Research Arm Test, upper extremity use in daily living, biomechanical measure of the sensorimotor grip control, and EEG-based neural communication. DISCUSSION: This research will determine clinical utility of TheraBracelet to guide future translation. The TheraBracelet stimulation is delivered via a wrist-worn device, does not interfere with hand motion, and can be easily integrated into clinical practice. Enhancing hand function should substantially increase stroke survivors' independence and quality of life and reduce caregiver burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04569123 . Registered on September 29, 2020.

Intense Arm Rehabilitation Therapy Improves the Modified Rankin Scale Score: Association Between Gains in Impairment and Function.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intensive rehabilitation on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a measure of activities limitation commonly used in acute stroke studies, and to define the specific changes in body structure/function (motor impairment) most related to mRS gains. METHODS: Patients were enrolled >90 days poststroke. Each was evaluated before and 30 days after a 6-week course of daily rehabilitation targeting the arm. Activity gains, measured using the mRS, were examined and compared to body structure/function gains, measured using the Fugl-Meyer (FM) motor scale. Additional analyses examined whether activity gains were more strongly related to specific body structure/function gains. RESULTS: At baseline (160 ± 48 days poststroke), patients (n = 77) had median mRS score of 3 (interquartile range, 2-3), decreasing to 2 [2-3] 30 days posttherapy (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤2 increased from 46.8% at baseline to 66.2% at 30 days posttherapy (p = 0.015). These findings were accounted for by the mRS score decreasing in 24 (31.2%) patients. Patients with a treatment-related mRS score improvement, compared to those without, had similar overall motor gains (change in total FM score, p = 0.63). In exploratory analysis, improvement in several specific motor impairments, such as finger flexion and wrist circumduction, was significantly associated with higher likelihood of mRS decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive arm motor therapy is associated with improved mRS in a substantial fraction (31.2%) of patients. Exploratory analysis suggests specific motor impairments that might underlie this finding and may be optimal targets for rehabilitation therapies that aim to reduce activities limitations. CLINICAL TRIAL: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02360488. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients >90 days poststroke with persistent arm motor deficits, intensive arm motor therapy improved mRS in a substantial fraction (31.2%) of patients.

Kinematic Measures of Bimanual Performance are Associated With Callosum White Matter Change in People With Chronic Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between bimanual performance deficits measured using kinematics and callosum (CC) white matter changes that occur in people with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study of participants with chronic stroke and age-matched controls. SETTING: Recruitment and assessments occurred at a stroke recovery research center. Behavioral assessments were performed in a controlled laboratory setting. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed at the Center for Biomedical Imaging. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals were enrolled and completed the study (N=39; 21 participants with chronic stroke; 18 age-matched controls with at least 2 stroke risk factors). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diffusion imaging metrics were obtained for each individual's CC and corticospinal tract (CST), including mean kurtosis (MK) and fractional anisotropy (FA). A battery of motor assessments, including bimanual kinematics, were collected from individuals while performing bimanual reaching. RESULTS: Participants with stroke had lower FA and MK in the CST of the lesioned hemisphere when compared with the non-lesioned hemisphere. The FA and MK values in the CST were correlated with measures of unimanual hand performance. In addition, participants with stroke had significantly lower FA and MK in the CC than matched controls. CC diffusion metrics positively correlated with hand asymmetry and trunk displacement during bimanual performance, even when correcting for age and lesion volume. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm previous studies that linked CST integrity to unimanual performance and provide new data demonstrating a link between CC integrity and both bimanual motor deficits and compensatory movements.

Capturing Upper Limb Gross Motor Categories Using the Kinect® Sensor.

IMPORTANCE: Along with growth in telerehabilitation, a concurrent need has arisen for standardized methods of tele-evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of using the Kinect sensor in an objective, computerized clinical assessment of upper limb motor categories. DESIGN: We developed a computerized Mallet classification using the Kinect sensor. Accuracy of computer scoring was assessed on the basis of reference scores determined collaboratively by multiple evaluators from reviewing video recording of movements. In addition, using the reference score, we assessed the accuracy of the typical clinical procedure in which scores were determined immediately on the basis of visual observation. The accuracy of the computer scores was compared with that of the typical clinical procedure. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Seven patients with stroke and 10 healthy adult participants. Healthy participants intentionally achieved predetermined scores. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Accuracy of the computer scores in comparison with accuracy of the typical clinical procedure (immediate visual assessment). RESULTS: The computerized assessment placed participants' upper limb movements in motor categories as accurately as did typical clinical procedures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computerized clinical assessment using the Kinect sensor promises to facilitate tele-evaluation and complement telehealth applications. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Computerized clinical assessment can enable patients to conduct evaluations remotely in their homes without therapists present.

Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Many patients receive suboptimal rehabilitation therapy doses after stroke owing to limited access to therapists and difficulty with transportation, and their knowledge about stroke is often limited. Telehealth can potentially address these issues. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment targeting arm movement delivered via a home-based telerehabilitation (TR) system has comparable efficacy with dose-matched, intensity-matched therapy delivered in a traditional in-clinic (IC) setting, and to examine whether this system has comparable efficacy for providing stroke education. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this randomized, assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial across 11 US sites, 124 patients who had experienced stroke 4 to 36 weeks prior and had arm motor deficits (Fugl-Meyer [FM] score, 22-56 of 66) were enrolled between September 18, 2015, and December 28, 2017, to receive telerehabilitation therapy in the home (TR group) or therapy at an outpatient rehabilitation therapy clinic (IC group). Primary efficacy analysis used the intent-to-treat population. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 36 sessions (70 minutes each) of arm motor therapy plus stroke education, with therapy intensity, duration, and frequency matched across groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in FM score from baseline to 4 weeks after end of therapy and change in stroke knowledge from baseline to end of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 124 participants (34 women and 90 men) had a mean (SD) age of 61 (14) years, a mean (SD) baseline FM score of 43 (8) points, and were enrolled a mean (SD) of 18.7 (8.9) weeks after experiencing a stroke. Among those treated, patients in the IC group were adherent to 33.6 of the 36 therapy sessions (93.3%) and patients in the TR group were adherent to 35.4 of the 36 assigned therapy sessions (98.3%). Patients in the IC group had a mean (SD) FM score change of 8.36 (7.04) points from baseline to 30 days after therapy (P < .001), while those in the TR group had a mean (SD) change of 7.86 (6.68) points (P < .001). The covariate-adjusted mean FM score change was 0.06 (95% CI, -2.14 to 2.26) points higher in the TR group (P = .96). The noninferiority margin was 2.47 and fell outside the 95% CI, indicating that TR is not inferior to IC therapy. Motor gains remained significant when patients enrolled early (<90 days) or late (≥90 days) after stroke were examined separately. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Activity-based training produced substantial gains in arm motor function regardless of whether it was provided via home-based telerehabilitation or traditional in-clinic rehabilitation. The findings of this study suggest that telerehabilitation has the potential to substantially increase access to rehabilitation therapy on a large scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02360488.

TheraBracelet Stimulation During Task-Practice Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral sensory stimulation has been used in conjunction with upper extremity movement therapy to increase therapy-induced motor gains in patients with stroke. The limitation is that existing sensory stimulation methods typically interfere with natural hand tasks and thus are administered prior to therapy, requiring patients' time commitment. To address this limitation, we developed TheraBracelet. This novel stimulation method provides subthreshold (ie, imperceptible) vibratory stimulation to the wrist and can be used during hand tasks/therapy without interfering with natural hand tasks. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the feasibility of using TheraBracelet during therapy to augment motor recovery after stroke. DESIGN: The design was a triple-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Twelve chronic stroke survivors were assigned to the treatment or control group. All participants completed 2-hour task practice therapy sessions thrice weekly for 2 weeks. Both groups wore a small vibrator on the paretic wrist, which was turned on to provide TheraBracelet stimulation for the treatment group and turned off for the control group to provide sham stimulation. Outcome measures (Box and Block Test [BBT] and Wolf Motor Function Test [WMFT]) were obtained at baseline, 6 days after therapy, and at follow-up 19 days after therapy. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible with no adverse events. The treatment group significantly improved their BBT scores after therapy and at follow-up compared with baseline, whereas the control group did not. For WMFT, the group × time interaction was short of achieving significance. Large effect sizes were obtained (BBT d = 1.43, WMFT d = 0.87). No indication of desensitization to TheraBracelet stimulation was observed. LIMITATIONS: The limitation was a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: TheraBracelet could be a promising therapy adjuvant for upper extremity recovery after stroke.

Interpreting Action Research Arm Test Assessment Scores to Plan Treatment.

Rasch keyforms can help interpret clinical assessment scores. The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a commonly used assessment, yet no keyform currently exists. The aim is to provide a keyform for the ARAT and demonstrate how a clinician can use the keyform to design optimally challenging rehabilitation sessions. Secondary analysis of ARAT data ( n = 122) using confirmatory factor and Rasch analyses were used to examine the measurement properties and generate a keyform. The item standardized factor loadings were >0.40 (range = 0.82-0.96) and R2 values were >.60 (range = .65-.96). All items exhibited adequate infit statistics with point measure correlations >.60 (range = .72-.97). Person reliability was .98, and person separation was 7.07. Item-difficulty measures ranged from -2.78 logits to 2.64 logits. The ARAT has strong measurement properties, and a keyform was provided. We showed how the keyform can be utilized by clinicians to interpret scores, set goals, and plan treatment.

Examining Anosognosia of Neglect.

Unilateral neglect (neglect) and anosognosia often co-occur post stroke. It is unknown whether anosognosia of neglect varies for different types of daily activities. The objective is to examine the frequency of anosognosia of neglect for items on the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) and to determine the level of agreement between participant/assessor item ratings and total scores. Secondary analysis of data was carried out. We conducted descriptive analyses and interrater reliability analyses (Cohen's kappa) to determine the level of agreement between assessor and participant item ratings. A paired t test was conducted to compare assessor and participant total scores. The frequency of anosognosia among items varied (29.2%-83.3%) and Kappa statistics ranged from -0.07 (no agreement) to 0.23 (fair agreement) for item ratings. There was a significant difference- t(36) = 3.02, p ≤ .01)-between assessor ( M = 8.0, SD = 5.2) and participant-rated ( M = 5.3, SD = 4.5) total CBS scores. Anosognosia is prevalent among those with neglect. Findings highlight the importance of assessing for anosognosia.

Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the measurement properties of the Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity (FTHUE) and examine how its score may or may not inform design of a rehabilitation program. DESIGN: The FTHUE was recently used in the Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation randomized controlled trial. This circumstance provided the opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the FTHUE as it pertains to contemporary poststroke rehabilitation and recovery models. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=109; mean age, 61.2±13.5y; mean days poststroke, 46±20.3) with resultant hemiparesis in the upper extremity. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dimensionality was examined with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and person and item measures were derived with Rasch item response analysis. Therapists' notes were also reviewed. RESULTS: The CFA results support unidimensionality, and 16 of 17 items fit the Rasch model. The Rasch person separation (2.17) and item separation (4.50) indices, ability strata (3.22), person reliability (.82), and item reliability (.95) indicate good measurement properties. Item difficulties ranked from -6.46 to 3.43 logits; however, there was a substantial ceiling effect of person measures. Post hoc examination of therapists' written observations indicated that the scoring criteria are not sensitive to the movement strategy used for task completion. CONCLUSIONS: The FTHUE's item difficulty hierarchy indicated that scores adequately distinguished the ability to perform simple versus complex motor movements of functional tasks. However, the FTHUE scoring method did not allow inclusion of the type of movement strategy used to accomplish task items. Therefore, we suggest modifications to the FTHUE that would allow it to be used for collaborative treatment planning and align well with more contemporary perspectives on treatment theory.

Do Neglect Assessments Detect Neglect Differently?

OBJECTIVE: We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke. METHOD: We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke. RESULTS: Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All participants demonstrated neglect on three or more assessments. Functional assessments and the virtual reality assessment detected neglect more frequently than the paper-and-pencil assessments. Participants performed differently on the paper-and-pencil assessments and functional assessments. CONCLUSION: Because neglect is complex, detection may depend largely on the assessment administered.

Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. DESIGN: Feasibility study, single group design. SETTING: University rehabilitation research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°. INTERVENTIONS: The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05). RESULTS: Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.

Identifying premature infants at high and low risk for motor delays using motor performance testing and MRS.

PURPOSE: To determine specific motor skills in premature infants, match those that correlate with standards tests of motor performance, and MRS measures of abnormal brain biochemistry. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of preterm infants (n=22). Infant motor assessments were completed at term and 12 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA) using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III at 12 months CGA. Infants (n=12) received MRS scans at term CGA. Rasch analysis and MRS findings investigated TIMP items well targeted to high and low risk infants. RESULTS: A 10 item subset of motor skill items correlated strongly with full 42-item TIMP at term and 12 week testing (r> 0.90, p< 0.001 for both), and with Bayley gross motor scores. MRS metabolites in basal ganglia correlated significantly with both TIMP and 10 item motor tests at term, while frontal white matter metabolites correlated with TIMP and 10 item tests at 12 weeks and Bayley motor scores. CONCLUSION: A short motor skill assessment may be representative of a longer standardized test and relate to brain metabolic function in key areas for motor movement and development. Validation of a shortened assessment may improve early identification of high-risk preterm infants.

Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To define Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) cutoff scores that demarcate 1 level of upper extremity (UE) impairment from another, and describe motor behaviors for each category in terms of expected FMA-UE item performance. DESIGN: Analysis of existing FMA-UE data. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Persons (N=512) 0 to 145 days poststroke, 42 to 90 years of age. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An item response Rasch analysis staging method was used to calculate cutoff scores, which were defined as the Rasch-Andrich threshold values of 2 criterion FMA-UE items derived from an analysis of this sample. The analysis enabled conversion of cutoff scores, in logit units, to FMA-UE points assessed on 30 FMA-UE voluntary movement items (60 possible points). RESULTS: The boundary between severe and moderate impairment was defined as -1.59 ± .27 logits or 19 ± 2 points; and between moderate and mild impairment was defined as 2.44 ± .27 logits or 47 ± 2 points. A description of expected performance in each impairment level shows that patients with severe impairment exhibited some distal movements, and patients with mild impairment had difficulties with some proximal movements. CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff scores, which link to a description of specific movements a patient can, can partially, and cannot perform, may enable formation of heterogeneous patient groups, advance efforts to identify specific movement therapy targets, and define treatment response in terms of specific movement that changed or did not change with therapy.

Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation, and the results of those that have been completed are perplexing because the experimental and control treatments were not different when matched for activity level. In addition, the outcome measures used to define treatment effects reflected behavioral endpoints, but did not reveal how neuroplastic mechanisms or other mechanistic factors may have contributed to the treatment response. Knowledge of both the neurophysiologic basis of recovery and key elements of interventions that drive motor learning, such as intensity and task progression, are critical for optimizing future poststroke motor rehabilitation clinical trials. SUMMARY: Future neurorehabilitation RCTs require a better understanding of the interaction of interventions and neurophysiological recovery in order to target interventions at specific neurophysiologic substrates, develop a more clear understanding of the impact of intervention parameters (e.g. dose, intensity), and advance discussions regarding optimal ways to partner medical and rehabilitation interventions in order to improve outcomes.

Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke.

Standardized assessments are critical for advancing clinical rehabilitation, yet assessment scores often provide little information for rehabilitation treatment planning. A keyform recovery map is an innovative way for a therapist to record patient responses to standardized assessment items. The form enables a therapist to view the specific items that a patient can or cannot perform. This information can assist a therapist in tailoring treatments to a patient's individual ability level. We demonstrate how a keyform recovery map can be used to inform clinical treatment planning for individuals with stroke-related upper-limb motor impairment. A keyform map of poststroke upper-limb recovery defined by items of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was generated by a previously published Rasch analysis. Three individuals with stroke enrolled in a separate research study were randomly selected from each of the three impairment strata of the FMA-UE. Their performance on each item was displayed on the FMA-UE keyform. The forms directly connected qualitative descriptions of patients' motor ability to assessment measures, thereby suggesting appropriate shorter and longer term rehabilitation goals. This study demonstrates how measurement theory can be used to translate a standardized assessment into a useful, evidence-based tool for making clinical practice decisions.

Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on poststroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Poststroke reaching is characterized by excessive trunk motion and abnormal shoulder-elbow coordination. Little attention is typically given to arm-trunk kinematics during task practice. Preventing compensatory trunk motion during short-term practice immediately improves kinematics, but effects of longer-term practice are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of intensive task practice with and without trunk restraint on poststroke reaching kinematics and function. METHODS: A total of 11 individuals with chronic stroke, baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment scores 26 to 54, were randomized to 2 constraint-therapy intervention groups. All participants wore a mitt on the unaffected hand for 90% of waking hours over 14 days and participated in 10 days/6 hours/day of supervised progressive task practice. During supervised sessions, one group trained with a trunk restraint (preventing anterior trunk motion) and one group did not. Tasks for the trunk-restraint group were located to afford repeated use of a shoulder flexion-elbow extension reaching pattern. Outcome measures included kinematics of unrestrained targeted reaching and tests of functional arm ability. RESULTS: Posttraining, the trunk-restraint group demonstrated straighter reach trajectories (P=.000) and less trunk displacement (P=.001). The trunk-restraint group gained shoulder flexion (P=.006) and elbow extension (P=.022) voluntary ranges of motion, the nonrestraint group did not. Posttraining angle-angle plots illustrated that individuals from the trunk-restraint group transitioned from elbow flexion to elbow extension during mid-reach; individuals in the nonrestraint group retained pretraining movement strategies. Both groups gained functional arm ability (P<.05 all tests). CONCLUSION: Intensive task practice structured to prevent compensatory trunk movements and promote shoulder flexion-elbow extension coordination may reinforce development of "normal" reaching kinematics.