Effects of structured intraoperative briefings on patient outcomes: multicentre before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: Operations require collaboration between surgeons, anaesthetia professionals, and nurses. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraoperative briefings influence patient outcomes. METHODS: In a before-and-after controlled trial (9 months baseline; 9 months intervention), intraoperative briefings were introduced in four general surgery centres between 2015 and 2018. During the operation, the responsible surgeon (most senior surgeon present) briefed the surgical team using the StOP? protocol about: progress of the operation (Status), next steps (Objectives), possible problems (Problems), and encouraged asking questions (?). Differences between baseline and intervention were analysed regarding surgical-site infections (primary outcome), mortality, unplanned reoperations, and duration of hospital stay (secondary outcomes), using inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighting based on propensity scores. RESULTS: In total, 8256 patients underwent surgery in the study. Endpoint data were available for 7745 patients (93.8 per cent). IPT-weighted and adjusted intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in surgical-site infections between baseline and intervention (9.8 versus 9.6 per cent respectively; adjusted difference (AD) -0.15 (95 per cent c.i. -1.45 to 1.14) per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.15; P = 0.797), but there were reductions in mortality (1.6 versus 1.1 per cent; AD -0.54 (-1.04 to -0.03) per cent; OR 0.60, 0.39 to 0.92; P = 0.018), unplanned reoperations (6.4 versus 4.8 per cent; AD -1.66 (-2.69 to -0.62) per cent; OR 0.72, 0.59 to 0.89; P = 0.002), and fewer prolonged hospital stays (21.6 versus 19.8 per cent; AD -1.82 (-3.48 to -0.15) per cent; OR 0.87, 0.77 to 0.98; P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Short intraoperative briefings improve patient outcomes and should be performed routinely.

Outcomes of surgery depend on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise, but also on teamwork, notably communication. The present study introduces the StOP? protocol, in which the surgeon informs the team about the current status (St), objectives regarding next steps (O), and potential problems (P), and encourages the team to ask questions and raise concerns (?). The results suggest an effect of the StOP? intervention on patient mortality, risk of unplanned reoperation, and duration of hospital stay, but not on surgical-site infections. The study is promising regarding the effect of structured intraoperative communication on important patient outcomes. The study compared patient outcomes at baseline and after implementation of the StOP? protocol, which enhances exchange of structured information within the interdisciplinary surgical team during the course of the operation. The intention-to-treat analyses in this multicentre before-and-after study of 8256 patients undergoing general surgery showed no differences between baseline and intervention for surgical-site infections, but revealed reduced mortality and unplanned reoperations, and fewer prolonged hospital stays during the intervention period.

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.

OBJECTIVE: The surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcers can be safely performed laparoscopically. The aim of the study was to define simple predictive factors for conversion and septic complications. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study analyzed patients treated with either laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy for perforated peptic ulcers. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were analyzed. Laparoscopically operated patients had a shorter hospital stay (13.7 vs. 15.1 days). In an intention-to-treat analysis, patients with conversion to open surgery (analyzed as subgroup from laparoscopic approach group) showed no prolonged hospital stay (15.3 days) compared to patients with a primary open approach. Complication and mortality rates were not different between the groups. The statistical analysis identified four intraoperative risk factors for conversion: Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) > 21 (p = 0.02), generalized peritonitis (p = 0.04), adhesions, and perforations located in a region other than the duodenal anterior wall. We found seven predictive factors for septic complications: age >70 (p = 0.02), cardiopulmonary disease (p = 0.04), ASA > 3 (p = 0.002), CRP > 100 (p = 0.005), duration of symptoms >24 h (p = 0.02), MPI > 21(p = 0.008), and generalized peritonitis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a primary laparoscopic approach has no disadvantages. Factors necessitating conversions emerged during the procedure inhibiting a preoperative selection. Factors suggesting imminent septic complications can be assessed preoperatively. An assessment of the proposed parameters may help optimize the management of possible septic complications.

HIF mediated and DNA damage independent histone H2AX phosphorylation in chronic hypoxia.

The histone variant 2AX (H2AX) is phosphorylated at Serine 139 by the PI3K-like kinase family members ATM, ATR and DNA-PK. Genotoxic stress, such as tumor radio- and chemotherapy, is considered to be the main inducer of phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX), which forms distinct foci at sites of DNA damage where DNA repair factors accumulate. γH2AX accumulation under severe hypoxic/anoxic (0.02% oxygen) conditions has recently been reported to follow replication fork stalling in the absence of detectable DNA damage. In this study, we found HIF-dependent accumulation of γH2AX in several cancer cell lines and mouse embryonic fibroblasts exposed to physiologically relevant chronic hypoxia (0.2% oxygen), which did not induce detectable levels of DNA strand breaks. The hypoxic accumulation of γH2AX was delayed by the RNAi-mediated knockdown of HIF-1α or HIF-2α and further decreased when both HIF-αs were absent. Conversely, basal phosphorylation of H2AX was increased in cells with constitutively stabilized HIF-2α. These results suggest that both HIF-1 and HIF-2 are involved in γH2AX accumulation by tumor hypoxia, which might increase a cancer cell's capacity to repair DNA damage, contributing to tumor therapy resistance.

Impaired DNA double-strand break repair contributes to chemoresistance in HIF-1 alpha-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

A mismatch between metabolic demand and oxygen delivery leads to microenvironmental changes in solid tumors. The resulting tumor hypoxia is associated with malignant progression, therapy resistance and poor prognosis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying therapy resistance in hypoxic tumors are not fully understood. The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a master transcriptional activator of oxygen-regulated gene expression. Transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from HIF-1alpha-deficient mice are a popular model to study HIF function in tumor progression. We previously found increased chemotherapy and irradiation susceptibility in the absence of HIF-1alpha. Here, we show by single-cell electrophoresis, histone 2AX phosphorylation and nuclear foci formation of gammaH2AX and 53BP1, that the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is increased in untreated and etoposide-treated HIF-deficient MEFs. In etoposide-treated cells, cell cycle control and p53-dependent gene expression were not affected by the absence of HIF-1alpha. Using a candidate gene approach to screen 17 genes involved in DNA repair, messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein of three members of the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex were found to be decreased in HIF-deficient MEFs. Of note, residual HIF-1alpha protein in cancer cells with a partial HIF-1alpha mRNA knockdown was sufficient to confer chemoresistance. In summary, these data establish a novel molecular link between HIF and DNA DSB repair. We suggest that selection of early, non-hypoxic tumor cells expressing low levels of HIF-1alpha might contribute to HIF-dependent tumor therapy resistance.