Subcostal uniportal robotic anatomic lung resection: A pilot trial.

Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery typically necessitates the use of multiple ports. The new single-port robotic system (da Vinci SP system) platform is designed to perform uniportal surgery. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the da Vinci SP system when used for anatomical lung resection. Methods: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I lung cancer requiring anatomical lung resections were considered eligible for this trial. The primary outcome measure was the rate of conversion, whereas the secondary objective focused on assessing the incidence of perioperative complications. Results: The study included 35 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 48-74 years). Of these, 30 underwent lobectomy and 5 received segmentectomy. All surgeries were successfully performed using a subcostal approach, except for 1 patient, who required a thoracotomy conversion due to bleeding (conversion rate: 2.9%). The median docking time was 2 minutes (range, 1-8 minutes). For the 34 patients who completed uniportal surgery, the median total operating time was 194 minutes (range, 63-405 minutes), whereas the console time was 153 minutes (range, 93-267 minutes). The median number of harvested nodes was 13 (range, 5-37), while the median number of nodal stations was 6 (rang, 4-8). There were no in-hospital fatalities, and the median postoperative stay was 3 days (range, 2-12 days). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the da Vinci SP system for anatomical lung resection through a subcostal approach. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT05535712.

Single-Port Robotic Trans-Subxiphoid Surgery for Anterior Mediastinal Disease: A Pilot Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on minimally invasive mediastinal surgery using a trans-subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic approach. Despite its potential advantages, the widespread adoption of this method has been hindered by the intricate surgical maneuvers required within the confined retrosternal space. Robotic surgery offers the potential to overcome the limitations inherent in the thoracoscopic technique. METHODS: This was a clinical trial (NCT05455840) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of utilizing the da Vinci® SP system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for trans-subxiphoid single-port surgery in patients with anterior mediastinal disease. The primary endpoints encompassed conversion rates and the secondary endpoints included the occurrence of perioperative complications. RESULTS: Between August 2022 and April 2023, a total of 15 patients (7 men and 8 women; median age = 56 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 49 to 65 years) underwent trans-subxiphoid robotic surgery using da Vinci SP platform for maximal thymectomy (n = 2) or removal of anterior mediastinal masses (n = 13). All surgical procedures were carried out with success, with no need for conversion to open surgery or the creation of additional ports. The median docking time was 2 min (IQR: 1 to 4 min), while the console time had a median of 152 min (IQR: 95 to 191 min). There were no postoperative complications and patients experienced a median postoperative hospital stay of 2 days with no unplanned 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that trans-subxiphoid single-port robotic surgery employing the da Vinci SP system in patients with anterior mediastinal disease is clinically viable with acceptable safety and short-term outcomes.

Safety and feasibility comparison between three different CT-guided localization techniques under systemic approach algorithm.

INTRODUCTION: In the era of lung cancer screening, more and more sub-centimeter indeterminate lung lesions are being identified. It is difficult to approach these lesions and obtain tissue to confirm diagnosis. CT-guided navigation followed by surgical resection is the best way to overcome this difficulty. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and feasibility of wire and dye-tattoo CT-guided localization techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2019 to August 2021, 418 patients who presented with single lung lesion and received single CT-guided localization were included in this study. Procedure details, navigation results, and related complications were compared. RESULTS: For patients who received wire localization, majority (98.3 %) had perihilar lesions. In addition, 68 (57.1 %) patients received tangential approach because of lesions were blocked by bony or vital structure, abutting major fissure, or previous approach failure. The characteristics of lesion location was quite different than dye-tattooing technique (p = 0.033). As regards persistence of the target lesion localization, the interval between localization and surgery using ICG tattooing was 829.0 ± 552.9 min; much longer than the other two navigation techniques (p < 0.0001). As regards safety, patients who received wire localization had a higher rate of pneumothorax (p = 0.042) and pulmonary hemorrhage (p < 0.001) than the dye-tattooing techniques. DISCUSSION: CT-guided navigation techniques are safe and feasible. Wire localization is suitable for centrally located lesions but the wire needs to be fixed properly and symptomatic pneumothorax monitored for. Dye-tattooing is more suitable for peripheral lesions, while ICG localization persists longer than other techniques.