Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.

The specific genetic subtypes that gliomas exhibit result in variable clinical courses and the need to involve multidisciplinary teams of neurologists, epileptologists, neurooncologists and neurosurgeons. Currently, the diagnosis of gliomas pivots mainly around the preliminary radiological findings and the subsequent definitive surgical diagnosis (via surgical sampling). Radiomics and radiogenomics present a potential to precisely diagnose and predict survival and treatment responses, via morphological, textural, and functional features derived from MRI data, as well as genomic data. In spite of their advantages, it is still lacking standardized processes of feature extraction and analysis methodology among different research groups, which have made external validations infeasible. Radiomics and radiogenomics can be used to better understand the genomic basis of gliomas, such as tumor spatial heterogeneity, treatment response, molecular classifications and tumor microenvironment immune infiltration. These novel techniques have also been used to predict histological features, grade or even overall survival in gliomas. In this review, workflows of radiomics and radiogenomics are elucidated, with recent research on machine learning or artificial intelligence in glioma.

The MRI Features and Prognosis of Gliomas Associated With IDH1 Mutation: A Single Center Study in Southwest China.

Purpose: To investigate the associations of MRI radiological features and prognosis of glioma with the status of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). Material and Methods: A total of 116 patients with gliomas were retrospectively recruited from January 2013 to December 2015. All patients were undergone routine MRI (T1WI, T2WI, T2-FLAIR) scanning and contrast-enhanced MRI T1WI before surgery. The following imaging features were included: tumor location, diameter, the pattern of growth, boundary, the degree of enhancement, mass effect, edema, cross the middle line, under the ependyma. χ2 and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to determine the significance of associations between MRI features and IDH1 mutation of glioma. The survival distributions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier compared by Log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression. Results: Gliomas with IDH1 mutant were significantly more likely to exhibit homogeneous signal intensity (p = 0.009) on non-contrast MRI protocols and less contrast enhancement (p = 0.000) on contrast enhanced T1WI. IDH1 mutant type glioma was more inclined to cross the midline to invade contralateral hemisphere (p = 0.001). The overall survival between IDH1 mutated and wild type glioma were significantly different (p = 0.000), age ≤ 40 (p = 0.003), KPS scores > 80 before operation (p = 0.000) and low grade glioma (p = 0.000). Conclusions: Our results suggest IDH1 mutant in gliomas is more likely to exhibit homogeneous signal intensity, less contrast enhancement and more inclined to cross the midline. Patients with IDH1 mutated, age ≤ 40, KPS scores > 80 before operation and low-grade glioma may have a longer life and better prognosis.