Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Final efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study.

INTRODUCTION: Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a 4th generation recombinant FVIII with proven efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. The NuProtect study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa in 108 previously untreated patients (PUPs). The incidence of high-titre inhibitors was 16.2% and no patients with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. AIM: To report the efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study. METHODS: PUPs received simoctocog alfa for prophylaxis, treatment of BEs, or as surgical prophylaxis. The efficacy of prophylaxis (during inhibitor-free periods) was assessed using annualised bleeding rates (ABRs). The efficacy in treating BEs and in surgical prophylaxis was assessed using a 4-point scale. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 108 PUPs treated with simoctocog alfa, 103 received at least one prophylactic dose and 50 received continuous prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks. In patients on continuous prophylaxis, the median ABR was 0 (mean 0.5) for spontaneous BEs and 2.5 (mean 3.6) for all BEs. In 85 patients who had BEs, efficacy of BE treatment was excellent or good for 92.9% (747/804) of rated BEs; 92.3% of BEs were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. The efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent or good for 94.7% (18/19) of rated procedures. There were no safety concerns and no thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well tolerated as prophylaxis, surgical prophylaxis and for the treatment of BEs in PUPs with severe haemophilia A.

Long-term immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa in patients with severe haemophilia A who had completed the NuProtect study in previously untreated patients.

BACKGROUND: The NuProtect study reported data on the immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq® ) in 108 previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A planned to be treated for ≥100 exposure days or up to 5 years. The NuProtect-Extension study collected long-term prophylaxis data in children with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: Patients who completed the NuProtect study according to the protocol were eligible for the NuProtect-Extension study, a prospective, multinational, non-controlled, Phase 3b study. RESULTS: Of 48 patients who entered the extension study, 47 (median age 2.8 years) received prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa for a median of 24 months, with 82%-88% on a twice-weekly or less regimen. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors during the extension study. The median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 0 (0-0.5) for spontaneous bleeding episodes (BEs) and 1.00 (0-1.95) for all BEs. ABRs estimated using a negative binomial model were .28 (95% CI: .15, .53) for spontaneous and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.42) for all BEs. During the median follow-up of 24 months, 34 (72%) patients had zero spontaneous BEs and 46 (98%) had zero spontaneous joint BEs. Efficacy in treating BEs was excellent or good for 78.2% of rated BEs, and efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent for two rated surgeries. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: No FVIII inhibitors developed during long-term prophylaxis in the NuProtect-Extension study. Prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well-tolerated, and is therefore an attractive long-term option for children with severe haemophilia A.

Magnetic resonance imaging in boys with severe hemophilia A: Serial and end-of-study findings from the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the structural outcomes for joints of boys with severe hemophilia A receiving frequency/dose-escalated primary prophylaxis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the importance of interval MRI changes. METHODS: Forty-six subjects (27 with interval studies) were evaluated by radiographs (X-rays) and mid- and end-of-study MRIs (using the International Prophylaxis Study Group scale), as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study. The primary outcome was the presence of MRI osteochondral findings. RESULTS: The median (range) time on study at the end-of-study MRI examination was 9.6 (4.8-16.0) years, during which 18 of 46 subjects (39%) had osteochondral changes in at least one joint. An interval change in MRI score of at least 1 point was observed in 44% of joints (43 ankles, 21 elbows, 4 knees); at least one joint showed this change in all 27 subjects. Self-reported interval hemarthrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of interval osteochondral change (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.06). Presence of synovial hypertrophy or hemosiderin on interval MRIs was associated with an OR of 4.71 (95% CI, 1.92-11.57) and 5.25 (95% CI, 2.05-13.40) of later osteochondral changes on MRI. DISCUSSION: MRI changes were seen in 39% of subjects. Interval index joint bleeding was associated with an increased risk of later MRI changes, and earlier soft-tissue changes were associated with subsequent osteochondral changes.

Simoctocog Alfa (Nuwiq) in Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Haemophilia A: Final Results of the NuProtect Study.

INTRODUCTION: FVIII inhibitor development is the most serious contemporary treatment complication in haemophilia A, particularly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). No inhibitors developed in clinical trials in previously treated patients treated with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq), a fourth-generation recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line. METHODS: The NuProtect study investigated the immunogenicity of simoctocog alfa in PUPs. NuProtect was a prospective, multinational, open-label, non-controlled, phase III study. PUPs with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) of any age and ethnicity were treated with simoctocog alfa for 100 exposure days or a maximum of 5 years. Patients were true PUPs without prior exposure to FVIII concentrates or blood components. Inhibitor titres were measured with the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay; cut-off for positivity was 0.6 BU mL-1 (≥0.6 to <5 low-titre, ≥5 high titre). RESULTS: A total of 108 PUPs with a median age at first treatment of 12.0 months (interquartile range: 8.0-23.5) were treated with simoctocog alfa. F8 mutation type was known for 102 patients (94.4%) of whom 90 (88.2%) had null F8 mutations and 12 (11.8%) had non-null mutations. Of 105 PUPs evaluable for inhibitor development, 28 (26.7%) developed inhibitors; 17 high titre (16.2%) and 11 low titre (10.5%). No PUPs with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In the NuProtect study, the rate of inhibitor development in PUPs with severe haemophilia A treated with simoctocog alfa was lower than the rate reported for hamster-cell-derived recombinant factor VIII products in other recent clinical trials. No inhibitors were reported in PUPs with non-null F8 mutations.

Hemophilia prophylaxis adherence and bleeding using a tailored, frequency-escalated approach: The Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A includes regular replacement of factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylaxis regimens using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII concentrates, while effective, are costly and require frequent intravenous infusions. AIM: This study evaluated the adherence of 56 boys with severe hemophilia A to tailored, frequency-escalated prophylaxis with an SHL recombinant FVIII concentrate. METHODS: We reviewed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of study subjects. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was calculated on a weekly basis, and bleeding rates were determined from self/proxy-reported bleeding logs. The primary outcome was adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. RESULTS: The median (range of values [ROV]) weekly adherence to prophylaxis was 85.7% (37.4%-99.8%). The median (ROV) adherent weeks on steps 1 (weekly), 2 (twice weekly), and 3 (alternate-day) were 92.9% (50%-100%), 80.3 (32%-96%), and 72.6% (14%-98%); relative to step 1, subjects were less likely to be adherent on steps 2 and 3 (P < 0.00). On step 1, our cohort had higher adherence than previously reported rates. The median (ROV) adherence to the breakthrough bleeding protocol was 47.1% (0%-100%). At any given time, bleeding risk was reduced by 15% for each 10% increase in adherence during the preceding 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90). CONCLUSION: This cohort had high rates of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Initiating prophylaxis with once-weekly infusions facilitated adherence to the prophylaxis regimen in this cohort of boys with severe hemophilia A started on primary prophylaxis at a very young age.

Tailored frequency-escalated primary prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A: results of the 16-year Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study longitudinal cohort.

BACKGROUND: Severe haemophilia A has high morbidity, and treatment, while effective, is very expensive. We report the 16-year follow-up of the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study, which examined the effectiveness of tailored frequency-escalated primary prophylaxis with a focus on health outcomes within the domains of body structures and functions, and activities and participation (according to the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [WHO-ICF] framework) and a view to reducing consumption of costly clotting factor, which accounts for more than 90% of the cost of care of severe haemophilia. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, boys with severe haemophilia A from 12 Canadian centres were enrolled at age 1·0-2·5 years. They were treated with standard half-life recombinant factor VIII (SHL-rFVIII), beginning as once-weekly prophylaxis with 50 IU/kg and escalating in frequency (with accompanying dose adjustments) in response to breakthrough bleeding as determined by the protocol. The primary endpoint for this analysis was joint health, as measured by the modified Colorado Child Physical Examination Scores (CCPES) at study end. All analyses were done by intention to treat. The trial is complete, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01085344. FINDINGS: Between June 26, 1997, and Jan 30, 2007, 56 boys were enrolled. They were followed for a median of 10·2 years (to a maximum of 16·1 years). Median rFVIII usage was about 3600 IU/kg per year. The median end-of-study CCPES physical examination score was 1 (IQR 1-3; range 0-12) for the left ankle and 1 (1-2; 0-12) for the right ankle, with all other joints having a median score of 0. No treatment-related safety events occurred over the duration of the study, including central venous catheter infections. The median annualised index joint bleeding rate was 0·95 per year (IQR 0·44-1·35; range 0·00-13·43), but 17 (30%) patients had protocol-defined unacceptable breakthrough bleeding at some point during the study. INTERPRETATION: Tailored frequency-escalated prophylaxis leads to very little arthropathy and very good health outcomes within the WHO-ICF domains, and only uses a moderate amount of expensive clotting factor as compared with standard prophylaxis protocols. Some sequelae of bleeding were observed in our cohort, and future studies should consider a more stringent protocol of escalation. FUNDING: This study was initially funded by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada/Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada Partnership Fund and the Bayer/Canadian Blood Services/Hema-Quebec Partnership Fund. Subsequent renewals were funded by Bayer.

Intra-arterial methylprednisolone for severe steroid refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease.

Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a significant complication of bone marrow transplantation with approximately half of patients being refractory to steroids. There are numerous second-line systemic immunosuppressive treatments but the overall prognosis is poor and these therapies are associated with high mortality due to infection. An alternative approach to systemic treatment for GVHD is targeted delivery of immunosuppression. We present two pediatric cases with steroid-refractory gastrointestinal GVHD who clinically responded to intra-arterial steroid administration. We also review the literature regarding this treatment modality with a particular emphasis in children.