Age, female sex, and oral contraceptive use are risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors affecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and outcomes following ACL reconstruction in males versus females. This study also analyzed oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use, demographics (e.g., body mass index [BMI], age group), comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), and post-operative systemic complications (e.g., anemia, malignant hyperthermia) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction from 2010-2018 were queried from the PearlDiver administrative claims database current procedural terminology (CPT) and international classification of disease (ICD) codes. The following information was collected using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes: concurrent use of OCPs, concomitant meniscus repair, demographics, age, comorbidities, and systemic complications. The number of ACL reconstructions in females and males were analyzed using multivariate regressions. RESULTS: Of 11,498 ACL reconstructions, 5,967 (51.9%) were in females and 5,531 (48.1%) were in males. The majority of patients were ages 15-19 (24.1%) and were not obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) (35.9%). A greater proportion of female patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were between 15-19 years old (P < 0.001) and obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2) (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of females aged 15-39 taking OCPs underwent ACL reconstruction compared to those not taking OCPs within the same age group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ACL tears are more common in female patients compared to males and are more commonly treated with ACL reconstruction. This study identified several factors that may be associated with the increased risk of ACL tears in females, including young age (age 15-39), obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2), and the use of OCPs prior to ACL reconstruction, which warrant further investigation and attention from surgeons.

Complications Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for Primary Ankle Osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: There are minimal data comparing complications between ankle arthrodesis (AA) versus total ankle arthroplasty (TAR) for operative management of primary osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to compare outcomes following AA versus TAR for primary ankle OA using a large patient database. METHODS: Patients who received AA or TAR for primary ankle OA from 2010 to 2019 were queried from PearlDiver. Rates of common joint complications were compared at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1136 (67%) patients received AA and 584 (33%) patients underwent TAR. Patients that received AA exhibited significantly higher rates of at least one common joint complication at 90 days (19.3% vs 12.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.69), 1 year (25.6% vs 15.0%; OR 2.00), and 2 years (26.9% vs 16.2%; OR 1.91) postoperatively. This included higher rates of adjacent fusion or osteotomy procedures, periprosthetic fractures, and hardware removal at each postoperative follow-up (all P < .05). Rates of prosthetic joint infection were comparable at 2 years postoperatively (4.3% vs 4.2%; OR 0.91). CONCLUSION: The AA cohort exhibited higher rates of postoperative joint complications in the short and medium-term, namely, subsequent fusions or osteotomies, periprosthetic fractures, and hardware removal. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reoperation Rates Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for Posttraumatic Indications.

AIMS: This studied aimed to compare rates of reoperation for patients who received primary ankle arthrodesis (AA) versus total ankle replacement (TAR) for posttraumatic indications between 2010 and 2016 Q2 using a nationwide claims database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzing patients who received primary AA or TAR for posttraumatic indications was performed using PearlDiver. Reoperations assessed included prosthetic joint infection (PJI), hardware removal, adjacent joint fusion, and local open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare rates of reoperations at 1 and 2 years postdischarge. RESULTS: A total of 862 (74%) patients received AA and 318 (26%) patients underwent TAR for a posttraumatic indication. At 1 year, 305 (35.4%) AA patients had at least 1 reoperation compared with 55 (17.3%) TAR patients (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.68-3.26). At 2 years, 364 (42.2%) AA patients and 66 (20.8%) TAR patients had at least 1 reoperation (OR 2.51; 95% CI, 1.84-3.45). ORIF, hardware removal, and adjacent joint fusions were more likely for AA patients at both time intervals (all Ps < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients who received primary AA for posttraumatic indications exhibited higher rates of major reoperations in the short to medium term compared with patients who underwent TAR. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Anterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery associated with lower risk of stroke, pneumonia, and infection compared to posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Background: Prior studies, comparing anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar fusion surgery, found similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes, but are limited by sample size. Further evaluation of the postoperative complications of each approach is necessary. Methods: The MSpine database by PearlDiver was queried using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes to identify patients who had undergone single-level anterior or posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Readmission rates, ileus, lower extremity DVT, infection, pneumonia, and stroke were used to compare post-operative complications of an anterior vs. posterior approach. Results: 112,023 patients were included in this study, with 38,529 (34.4%) in the anterior group (ALIF/LLIF) and 73,494 (65.6%) in the posterior group (PLIF/TLIF). At both 30 and 90-days postoperative, patients undergoing an anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion had a higher odds ratio of lower extremity DVT (30-day OR: 1.19, 90-day OR: 1.16; P<0.05) and ileus complication (30-day OR: 1.87, P= <.05; 90-day OR: 1.81, P<.05). At both 30 and 90-days postoperative, patients undergoing a posterior approach had a higher odds ratio of stroke (30-day: OR: 0.79, 90-day OR: 0.87; P<0.05), transfusion (30-day OR: 0.66, 90-day OR: 0.69; P<.05), infection (30-day OR: 0.88, 90-day OR: 0.91; P <.05), and pneumonia (30-day OR: 0.85, 90-day OR: 0.90; P<.05). There was no statistically significant difference in myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism between both approaches at 30 and 90-days postoperative. Conclusions: Anterior and posterior approaches for lumbar interbody fusion were associated with differences in postoperative complications at 30 and 90-days. The complication profiles associated with each approach can inform surgeon treatment decisions based on patient profiles.

Age and Female Sex Are Important Risk Factors for Stress Fractures: A Nationwide Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stress fractures are caused by micro-trauma due to repetitive stress on bone, common in active individuals and athletes. Previous studies demonstrate that the weightbearing bones of the lower extremities incur stress fractures most often, especially in women and older adults. HYPOTHESIS: Prior literature does not quantify the difference in frequency of stress fractures among different genders, age groups, or body mass indices (BMIs). We hypothesized that older female patients would have higher rates of lower extremity stress fractures than male patients. STUDY DESIGN: Epidemiological research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Records of female and male patients with lower extremity stress fractures from 2010 to 2018 were identified from the PearlDiver administrative claims database using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 codes. Stress fractures were classified by ICD-10 diagnosis codes to the tibial bone, proximal femur, phalanges, and other foot bones. Comorbidities were incorporated into a regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 41,257 stress fractures identified, 30,555 (70.1%) were in women and 10,702 (25.9%) were in men. Our sample was older (>60 years old) (37.3%) and not obese (BMI <30 kg/m2, 37.1%). A greater proportion of female patients with stress fracture were older (P < 0.001) and had foot stress fractures (P < 0.001), while a greater proportion of male patients with stress fracture were younger than 19 years (P < 0.001) and had metatarsal (P < 0.001), hip (P = 0.002), and tibia stress fractures (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stress fractures commonly occur in women and older adults with low BMIs. Metatarsal and tibia stress fractures were the most common, and a greater proportion of women had foot stress fractures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study examined the large-scale prevalence of different lower extremity stress fractures among a wide patient population sample of varying ages and BMIs. These findings can help clinicians identify active populations at greater risk for stress fracture injuries.

The injury characteristics of open pilon fractures predictive of complications.

OBJECTIVE: Determine predictive injury factors for wound complications in open pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43B and 43C). DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 open pilon fractures in 60 patients were evaluated after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: The majority of injuries underwent a staged protocol with immediate antibiotics, debridement, irrigation and external fixation. Following soft tissue stabilization, internal fixation was performed and wound closure achieved in a coordinated fashion depending on the type of closure required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Early amputation rate, 90-day major (wound dehiscence or deep infection requiring operative intervention) and minor (superficial infection) wound complications. RESULTS: Four patients incurred early amputations, 11 had major wound complications and 5 had minor wound complications. An early amputation was more likely if they presented with an OTA Open Fracture Classification (OTA-OFC) Bone Loss Grade 3. A major wound complication was more likely if they presented with a fall from > 3 m, a multifragmentary articular surface, a segmental fibula fracture, or an OTA-OFC Contamination Grade 3. A multifragmentary articular surface was also predictive of developing any wound complication. CONCLUSIONS: Open pilon fractures are severe, limb-threatening injuries and are at risk for wound complications. Patients presenting with these injuries and a predictive factor should be counseled regarding the possibility of early limb loss or experiencing a wound complication that will require additional treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The dual degree orthopedic surgeon: A survey of the trends, motivations, and perceived value of the master of business administration degree.

Orthopedic surgeons are obtaining Master of Business Administration (MBA) degrees at an increasing rate. This study aimed to identify the motivations, trends, and perceived value of the MBA degree for these dual degree surgeons. A total of 157 orthopedic surgeons with both MD and MBA degrees were surveyed with a 19-item questionnaire to identify surgeons' motivations for obtaining an MBA degree and the perceived value of the degree. A total of 66 responses (42%) were received. Most respondents (89.4%) viewed the MBA degree as either extremely valuable or valuable. Prior to obtaining an MBA, 71.9% of dual degree surgeons dedicated time to administrative duties outside of the clinic. This number increased to 98.4% after receiving an MBA (p < 0.001). With the growing number of surgeons pursuing MBA degrees, there is a decrease in the time spent in the clinical role suggesting that either the non-clinical burden is increasing, or surgeons choose to re-allocate their time. Despite the high direct costs of an MBA, a majority of orthopedic surgeons perceived the MBA degree as a valuable investment they would pursue again.

Opioid Claims Prior to Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty and Risk of Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Claims.

INTRODUCTION: The United States is experiencing a national opioid epidemic. This study seeks to analyze recent trends in opioid claims after elective total joint arthroplasty and quantify the effect of preoperative opioid use on risk of prolonged postoperative claim rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database to track annual trends in opioid claims after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Trend analysis of opioid claim rates was done with the Cochran-Armitage test. Rates of postoperative opioid claims were compared between opioid-naïve patients versus patients with opioid claims in the preoperative year through multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 105,860 procedures were included. For all procedures, the proportion of patients filing an opioid claim within 30 days postoperatively trended upward from 2011 to 2017 (all P < 0.001). Patients with one to three opioid claims in the year before arthroplasty were more likely to file an opioid claim within 30 days after arthroplasty (THA: odds ratio [OR], 2.61; TKA: OR, 3.04; and TSA: OR, 4.83), between 31 and 90 days (THA: OR, 2.76; TKA: OR, 2.87; and TSA: OR, 3.22), and between 91 days and 6 months (THA: OR, 4.83; TKA: OR, 4.07; and TSA: OR, 3.77). Patients with more than three prior opioid claims were more likely to file an opioid claim within 30 days (THA: OR, 6.15; TKA: OR, 6.79; and TSA: OR, 8.68), between 31 and 90 days (THA: OR, 20.99; TKA: OR, 14.00; and TSA: OR, 28.40), and between 91 days and 6 months (THA: OR, 46.31; TKA: OR, 33.93; and TSA: OR, 59.06). CONCLUSION: Opioid claims in the preoperative year markedly increase risk of prolonged postoperative opioid claims after arthroplasty. Surgeons should look further before the acute preoperative period when evaluating opioid exposure and assessing risk of chronic opioid dependence after elective arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased rate of complications in myasthenia gravis patients following hip and knee arthroplasty: a nationwide database study in the PearlDiver Database on 257,707 patients.

Background and purpose - The increasing prevalence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within the growing elderly population is translating into a larger number of patients with neuromuscular conditions such as myasthenia gravis (MG) receiving arthroplasty. We compared systemic and joint complications following a THA or TKA between patients with MG and patients without MG.Patients and methods - Patient records were queried from PearlDiver (Pearl Diver Inc, Fort Wayne, IN, USA), an administrative claims database, using ICD-9/ICD-10 and Current Procedural Terminology codes. In-hospital and 90-day post-discharge rates of systemic and joint complications were compared between the 2 cohorts.Results - 372 patients with MG and 249,428 patients without MG who received a THA or TKA were included in the study. At 90 days post-discharge, MG patients exhibited exhibited between 1.6 and 15% higher rates of systemic complications, including cerebrovascular event, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, anemia, and deep vein thrombosis (all p < 0.001). The same results were also found during the in-hospital time period. 90-day incidence of aseptic loosening was the only joint complication with significantly increased odds risk for the MG cohort (OR 5; 95% CI 2-12).Interpretation - Patients with MG exhibited significantly higher risk for multiple systemic complications during the index hospital stay and in the acute post-discharge setting.

How Did the Number and Type of Injuries in Patients Presenting to a Regional Level I Trauma Center Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic with a Stay-at-home Order?

BACKGROUND: During a pandemic, it is paramount to understand volume changes in Level I trauma so that with appropriate planning and reallocation of resources, these facilities can maintain and even improve life-saving capabilities. Evaluating nonaccidental and accidental trauma can highlight potential areas of improvement in societal behavior and hospital preparedness. These critical questions were proposed to better understand how healthcare leaders might adjust surgeon and team coverage of trauma services as well as prepare from a system standpoint what resources will be needed during a pandemic or similar crisis to maintain services. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How did the total observed number of trauma activations, defined as patients who meet mechanism of injury requirements which trigger the notification and aggregation of the trauma team upon entering the emergency department, change during a pandemic and stay-at-home order? (2) How did the proportion of major mechanisms of traumatic injury change during this time period? (3) How did the proportion and absolute numbers of accidental versus nonaccidental traumatic injury in children and adults change during this time period? METHODS: This was a retrospective study of trauma activations at a Level I trauma center in New Orleans, LA, USA, using trauma registry data of all patients presenting to the trauma center from 2017 to 2020. The number of trauma activations during a government mandated coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) stay-at-home order (from March 20, 2020 to May 14, 2020) was compared with the expected number of activations for the same time period from 2017 to 2019, called "predicted period". The expected number (predicted period) was assumed based on the linear trend of trauma activations seen in the prior 3 years (2017 to 2019) for the same date range (March 20, 2020 to May 14, 2020). To define the total number of traumatic injuries, account for proportion changes, and evaluate fluctuation in accidental verses nonaccidental trauma, variables including type of traumatic injury (blunt, penetrating, and thermal), and mechanism of injury (gunshot wound, fall, knife wound, motor vehicle collision, assault, burns) were collected for each patient. RESULTS: There were fewer total trauma activations during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (372 versus 532 [95% CI 77 to 122]; p = 0.016). The proportion of penetrating trauma among total activations was greater during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (35% [129 of 372] versus 26% [141 of 532]; p = 0.01), while the proportion of blunt trauma was lower during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (63 % [236 of 372] versus 71% [376 of 532]; p = 0.02). The proportion of gunshot wounds in relation to total activations was greater during the stay-at-home period than expected (26% [97 of 372] versus 18% [96 of 532]; p = 0.004). There were fewer motor vehicle collisions in relation to total activations during the stay-at-home period than expected (42% [156 of 372] versus 49% [263 of 532]; p = 0.03). Among total trauma activations, the stay-at-home period had a lower proportion of accidental injuries than the predicted period (55% [203 of 372] versus 61% [326 of 532]; p = 0.05), and there was a greater proportion of nonaccidental injuries than the predicted period (37% [137 of 372] versus 27% [143 of 532]; p < 0.001). In adults, the stay-at-home period had a greater proportion of nonaccidental injuries than the predicted period (38% [123 of 328] versus 26% [123 of 466]; p < 0.001). There was no difference between the stay-at-home period and predicted period in nonaccidental and accidental injuries among children. CONCLUSION: Data from the trauma registry at our region's only Level I trauma center indicate that a stay-at-home order during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 70% reduction in the number of traumatic injuries, and the types of injuries shifted from more accidental blunt trauma to more nonaccidental penetrating trauma. Non-accidental trauma, including gunshot wounds, increased during this period, which suggest community awareness, crisis de-escalation strategies, and programs need to be created to address violence in the community. Understanding these changes allows for adjustments in staffing schedules. Surgeons and trauma teams could allow for longer shifts between changeover, decreasing viral exposure because the volume of work would be lower. Understanding the shift in injury could also lead to a change in specialists covering call. With the often limited availability of orthopaedic trauma-trained surgeons who can perform life-saving pelvis and acetabular surgery, this data may be used to mitigate exposure of these surgeons during pandemic situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Is Patient-reported Penicillin Allergy Independently Associated with Increased Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder?

BACKGROUND: Patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy may be at greater risk for postoperative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty of the hip, knee, or shoulder. The increased risk of PJI in these patients has been attributed to these patients receiving a less-effective perioperative antibiotic. However, prior reports did not fully address the clinical characteristics of these unique patients, who may inherently be at greater risk of having a PJI, which may confound prior findings. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: After controlling for risk factors for PJI such as BMI, anxiety, depression, and other comorbidities, we asked: Are patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy more likely to have a PJI after THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty than patients without such a reported allergy? METHODS: We queried patient records from 2010 to 2017 from a nationwide administrative claims database of 122 million patients to adequately power an investigation comparing the 1-year incidence of PJI after TKA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and THA in patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy versus patients without a patient-reported penicillin allergy. Operative treatments for deep joint infection, identified by Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used as a surrogate for PJI. Clinical characteristics such as age, sex, BMI, length of stay, and Charlson comorbidity index and specific comorbidities including alcohol abuse, anemia, anxiety, cardiac disease, diabetes, immunocompromised status, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, tobacco use, and peripheral vascular disease were queried for each study group. The odds of PJI within 1 year of THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty were compared using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as BMI, anxiety, depression and other comorbidities, we found that patient-reported penicillin allergy was independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after TKA (odds ratio 1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.4]; p < 0.01) and total shoulder arthroplasty (OR 3.9 [95% CI 2.7 to 5.4]; p < 0.01). However, patient-reported penicillin allergy was not independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after THA (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.3]; p = 0.36) after controlling for the same risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy were at an increased risk for PJI after TKA and total shoulder arthroplasty, which we suspect-but cannot prove-is likely a function of those patients receiving a second-line antibiotic for presurgical prophylaxis. Since prior research has found that many patients listed in medical records as having a penicillin allergy are in fact not allergic to penicillin, we suggest that surgeons consider preoperative allergy testing, such as using an intraoperative test dose, to aid in choosing the most appropriate antibiotic choice before knee or shoulder arthroplasty and to amend patient medical records based on testing results. Future studies should determine whether this additional diagnostic maneuver is cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

"Nailable" External Fixation of the Tibia: A Novel Technique to Accommodate Delayed Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia.

External fixation is often used for temporary stabilization of the tibia in several clinical scenarios. Conventional placement of external fixation pins may impede instrumentation with intramedullary nailing, thus requiring pin removal, loss of reduction, and increased operative time during definite fixation. In this article, we describe a strategic pin placement routinely used at our institution in which we create a medially based inverted triangular construct that allows for pins to remain in place during definitive fixation.

Management of Orthopaedic Emergencies During a Pandemic: Compartment Syndrome of the Hand in a Patient with COVID-19: A Case Report.

CASE: A 58-year-old man presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome and coagulopathy secondary to COVID-19. He developed acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the left hand. He underwent a bedside 10-compartment decompression of the hand with volar forearm and carpal tunnel release while in the ICU. This report adds to the scarce body of literature regarding orthopaedic complications related to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Coagulopathy secondary to COVID-19 can be a risk factor for the development of ACS. Frequent examinations of lines, restraints, and extremities are recommended. The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges, necessitating clinical adjustments to best care for patients.

Complete 180-Degree Dislocation of a Rotating Platform after Closed Reduction for Mobile Bearing Spinout.

Rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty was designed to help decrease backside polyethylene wear and allow maximal conformity between the femoral and tibial components, but there have been multiple reports of dislocation and spinout of these implants. There are 4 case reports in the literature of knee dislocations with 180° rotation of the platform, 3 of which occurred during relocation attempts. This is only the second case in a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing device. We present a case of complete 180° dislocation of a rotating platform after closed reduction in a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty, with subsequent conversion to hinge knee arthroplasty.

Robotic Surgery in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Survey of the AAHKS Membership to Understand the Utilization, Motivations, and Perceptions of Total Joint Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, the popularity of robot arm assistance in total joint arthroplasty has outpaced the reporting of long-term data. This study aimed to understand the motivations for use and perceptions of the technology among total joint surgeons. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to the membership of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. The questions were asked for respondent's motivations for utilization of the technology, perceptions regarding outcomes and training, and personal characteristics that may have influenced responses. RESULTS: Increased precision was the primary reason for users (73.1%) to utilize robot arm assistance in total joint procedures. Nonusers were just as likely to consider adopting the technology because of increase precision and marketing (P = .590). Nonclinical reasons such as marketing, administrative pressure, and peer pressure were primary motivators for 19.7% of users of the technology. Respondents regardless of financial interest and use of the technology felt that robot arm assistance increased operative time (76.5%) and was not more cost-effective than traditional methods (78.7%). Most American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons members felt that 20-40 surgical cases were needed to become competent with the technique (54.1%). A unique finding of this study is that a larger proportion of orthopedic surgeons considered themselves "innovators" or "early adopters," based on Roger's diffusion of innovations, than was expected for the general population. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the decision to adopt robot arm assistance in total joint arthroplasty is multifactorial and may have a significant contribution from nonclinical factors and inherent surgeon characteristics. Continued evaluation of surgeon perceptions will be valuable as new evidence emerges regarding long-term outcomes.

Increased Intercondylar Femoral Box Cut-to-Femur Size Ratio During Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk for Intraoperative Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic intraoperative fractures are preventable complications in total knee arthroplasty. As press-fit fixation becomes more popular, further investigation into risk factors is needed. Some authors have suggested that smaller femurs may be at higher risk in posterior-stabilized constructs owing to industry designs trending toward larger, constant box sizes that increase the amount of bone resection relative to bone stock. METHODS: Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to investigate the effect of insertion of posterior-stabilized femoral components on stress distributions in small femurs and whether common bony preparation techniques could further affect risk for intraoperative fracture. The FEA results were validated with mechanical testing by loading to failure with varying resection depths of the distal femur and varying lateralization of the box cut. RESULTS: With a standard distal resection depth and neutral box position, a decrease in femur size led to an increase in maximal von Mises stresses by 43.6% medially and 44.3% laterally. Box lateralization and increased distal resection depth had minimal changes on the maximal stresses (3.3% medially and -0.4% laterally) on average-sized femurs while having a much larger effect on the stress distribution in small femurs (118.3% medially and 6.7% laterally). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of intraoperative femur fractures is potentially preventable. Small femur sizes, especially ones that would require increased distal resection or change in implant positioning, may benefit from an alternative design without the need for a cam/post mechanism.

Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia Secondary to Commonly Used Antibiotics in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia secondary to antibiotic exposure is a rare complication more commonly associated with other medications. In this review, we present a case of antibiotic-induced thrombocytopenia and discuss the clinical picture and approach to identifying the complication. With increasing use of antibiotics that may be associated with drug-induced thrombocytopenia in perioperative prophylaxis protocols, surgeons need to be cognizant of this cause of thrombocytopenia in the postoperative patient. A delay in recognition and discontinuation of the offending agent can result in significant complications secondary to bleeding and superfluous testing.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Is an Equal Alternative to Surgery in the Treatment of Type 1 Medial Epicondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Medial epicondylitis (ME) is characterized as an overuse injury resulting in pathological alterations of the common flexor tendon at the elbow. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently become of interest in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions as an alternative to operative management. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of recalcitrant type 1 ME after treatment with either PRP or surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: To compare the 2 methods of treatment, we performed a retrospective review of 33 patients diagnosed with type 1 ME from 2006 to 2016 with a minimum clinical follow-up of 1 year who had failed an initial nonoperative treatment program of injections, medication, topical creams, and/or physical therapy. Overall, 15 patients were treated with a series of 2 leukocyte-rich PRP injections, and 18 patients were treated with surgery. Outcome measures included time to pain-free status, time to full range of motion (ROM), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Each patient had at least 1-year follow-up. They were then contacted by telephone to determine final scores at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Unsuccessful outcomes were determined by the Nirschl grading system and failure to reach pain-free status, achieve baseline ROM, or return to previous activity. RESULTS: The mean final follow-up was 3.9 years. A statistically significant improvement was noted in both time to full ROM (42.3 days for PRP vs 96.1 days for surgery; P < .01) and time to pain-free status (56.2 days for PRP vs 108.0 days for surgery; P < .01). Successful outcomes were observed in 80% of patients treated with PRP and 94% of those treated operatively (P = .37). No significant difference was found in return-to-activity rates, overall successful outcomes, MEPS scores, or OES scores. CONCLUSION: In this case series, the use of PRP showed clinically similar outcomes to those of surgery in recalcitrant type 1 ME. PRP can be considered as an alternative to surgery in the treatment of recurrent ME, with an earlier time to full ROM and time to pain-free status compared with surgery.

Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study Comparing Elective vs Hip Fracture Cases.

BACKGROUND: The changing evaluation of provider metrics and payments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) necessitates current information for leaders in advocacy and policy. This study aims to use a contemporary nationwide cohort to compare and quantify the differences between the preoperative profile and clinical outcomes of THA performed for elective indications and for femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Patient records from 2007 to 2017 were queried from an administrative claims database of privately insured patients comparing THA performed for femoral neck fractures vs elective indications. Ninety-day readmission rates as well as in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge rates of local and systemic complications were collected and compared with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 83,319 primary THAs, 6895 (8.3%) were fracture cases and 76,424 (91.7%) were elective. A greater proportion of fracture patients were older, female, not obese, and had a higher burden of comorbidities (all P < .001). Fracture patients had significantly higher average lengths of stay and complication rates for all perioperative and postoperative joint and systemic complications measured (all P < .001) as well as 90-day cost (32,228 vs 22,917 USD, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Fracture patients are inherently more difficult cases to manage as surgeons. The results of these data may have significance in improving care coordination and provide evidence for further risk adjustment in payment models. Leaders in advocacy and policy should consider patient-level risk adjustments within alternative payment models to account for the increased association of complications, length of stay, readmission rate, and comorbidities in fracture patients receiving THA compared to elective patients.

Double Row-Equivalent PASTA Repair Technique.

Articular surface partial rotator cuff tendon tears are a common source of shoulder pain and dysfunction, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal arthroscopic treatment. Commonly accepted techniques, such as transtendinous repair or tear takedown with primary repair, may violate healthy tendon tissue and increase the suture anchor density. In this note, we describe an outside-in double row-equivalent technique for repair of partial articular-sided rotator cuff tears. A medial row of inverted horizontal mattress stitches is placed percutaneously using spinal needles to shuttle partially absorbable braided sutures into the joint. The technique may incorporate a soft tissue biceps tenodesis into the rotator cuff with a second, oblique medial row mattress stitch. Suture limbs are retrieved and tied in the subacromial space and then secured to a lateral anchor. The result is a side-to-side double row-equivalent rotator cuff repair, anatomically reproducing the footprint of the rotator cuff without removing healthy tissue. We believe this is an efficient and reproducible technique that preserves intact bursal tissue, limits implant costs, and produces reliable healing in partial articular-sided tears of the rotator cuff.