Morphometric analysis of cervical disc space height and interpedicular distance using computed tomography.

Background: This study utilized computed tomography (CT) to establish normative radiographic morphometric measurements of cervical disc space height (DSH) and interpedicular distance (IPD) and document the influence of patient sex, race, ethnicity, and anthropometric characteristics. Methods: Cervical CTs of 1000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age without known spinal pathology were reviewed. Statistical analyses included the assessment of associations between patient height, weight, sex, race, and ethnicity regarding DSH and IPD. Results: Irrespective of disc level, average DSH measurements were as follows: anterior height of 2.6 ± 1.0 mm, middle height of 4.1 ± 1.2 mm, and posterior height of 1.8 ± 1.0 mm. IPD was only measured between C3 and C7 vertebrae, and irrespective of disc level, the mean IPD measurement was 21.1 ± 1.5 mm. Significant differences for anterior, middle, posterior DSH, and IPD were observed in all disc levels. Significant differences in DSH and IPD were observed for all anthropometric factors of sex, race, and ethnicity relative to vertebral level. Males had significantly larger DSH and IPD measurements across all vertebral levels compared to females. Caucasians had larger DSH and IPD at select vertebral levels compared to African Americans and Hispanics. Conclusion: This study describes measurements of DSH and IPD between C2 and T1 levels in 1000 healthy 18-35-year-old subjects without known pathology. DSH and IPD measurements varied based on patient sex, race, ethnicity, and disc level.

Morphometric analysis of cervical neuroforaminal dimensions from C2-T1 using computed tomography of 1,000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Race and sex differences are not consistently reported in the literature. Fundamentally, anatomical differences of cervical neuroforaminal dimensions (CNFD) amongst these groups would be important to know. PURPOSE: To establish normative radiographic morphometric measurements of CNFD and uncover the influence of patient sex, race, and ethnicity while also considering anthropometric characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic morphometric study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were free of spinal pathology. OUTCOME MEASURES: Foraminal height, axial width, and area of cervical neural foramen. METHODS: Cervical CTs were reviewed to measure CNFD, defined as follows: foraminal height, axial width, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess associations between CNFD, and patient height, weight, sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: CNFD measurements followed a bimodal distribution pattern moving caudally from C2-T1. Irrespective of disc level, cervical CNFD were as follows: left and right widths of 6.6±1.5 and 6.6±1.5 mm, heights of 9.4±2.4 and 9.4±3.2 mm, and areas of 60.0±19.5 and 60.6±20.7 mm2. Left and right foraminal width were highest at C2-C3 and lowest at C3-C4. Left and right foraminal height were highest at C7-T1 and C6-C7, respectively and lowest at C3-C4. Left and right foraminal areas were highest at C2-C3 and lowest at C3-C4. Significant differences were observed for all CNFD measurements across disc levels. CNFD did not vary based on laterality. Significant CNFD differences were observed with respect to patient sex, race, and ethnicity. Male height and area were larger compared to females. In contrast, female foraminal width was larger compared to males. The Asian cohort demonstrated the largest foraminal widths. White and Hispanic patients demonstrated the largest foraminal heights and areas. Black patients demonstrated the smallest foraminal widths, heights, and areas. Patient height and weight were only weakly correlated with CNFD measurements across all levels from C2-T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes 36,000 normative measurements of 12,000 foramina from C2-T1. CNFD measurements vary based on disc level, but not laterality. Contrasting left- versus right-sided neuroforamina of the same level may aid in determining the presence of unilateral stenosis. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity are associated with CNFD, while patient anthropometric factors are weakly correlated with CNFD.

Oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1: feasibility, surgical approach window, incision line, and influencing factors.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to describe the feasibility, surgical approach window (SAW), and incision line (IL) for oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1 (OLIF51) using computed tomography (CT). A secondary aim was to identify associations among approach characteristics and demographic and anthropometric factors. METHODS: We performed a radiographic study of 50 male and 50 female subjects who received abdominal CT imaging. SAW was measured as the distance from the midline to the medial border of the iliac vessel. IL was measured at the skin surface corresponding to the distance between the center of the disc space and SAW lateral margin. OLIF51 feasibility was defined as the existence of at least a 1-cm SAW without retraction of soft tissues. RESULTS: For the left side, the OLIF51 SAW and IL were 12.1 ± 4.6 and 175.1 ± 55.3 mm. For the right side, these measures were 10.0 ± 4.3 and 185.0 ± 52.5 mm. Correlations of r = 0.648 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.656 (p < 0.001) were observed between weight and IL on the left and right sides, respectively. OLIF51 was not feasible 23% of the time. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest CT study to determine the feasibility of performing an OLIF51. Without the use of retraction, OLIF51 is not feasible 23% of the time. Left-sided OLIF51 allows for a larger surgical approach window and smaller incision compared to the right side. Larger incisions are required for adequate surgical exposure in patients with higher weight.

Correlations among Cervical, Thoracic, and lumbar Hounsfield Unit measurements for assessment of bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: Bone mineral density assessment using Hounsfield Unit (HU) currently depends upon the availability of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the associations among HU measurements of the cervical (CHU), thoracic (THU), and lumbar (LHU) spine. The secondary aim of this study was to analyze the influence of patient demographic and anthropometric characteristics on HU measurements. METHODS: Radiographic records of 165 patients who underwent CT of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were retrieved. The CHU, THU, and LHU were calculated by obtaining the mean signal intensity from the medullary portions of C3-C7, T8-T12, and L1-L4 vertebral bodies. RESULTS: Mean CHU, THU, and LHU values were 266.26 ± 88.69, 165.57 ± 55.06, and 166.45 ± 51.38. Significant differences of 100.69, 99.81, and 0.88 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p =.023). Correlations of 0.574, 0.488, and 0.686 were observed between CHU and THU (p <.001), CHU and LHU (p <.001), and THU and LHU (p <.001). No differences in HU based on sex, age, height, weight, or ethnicity were observed. Multivariate regression models demonstrated R2 values of 0.770 - 0.790 (p <.001) in prediction of LHU. CONCLUSIONS: Hounsfield Unit measurements derived from the cervical and thoracic spine correlate with the validated lumbar Hounsfield Unit. Hounsfield Unit measurements do not vary based on sex, ethnicity, age, height, or weight.

Normative Measurements of L1 to S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Derived From Plain Film Radiography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To report normative measurements of L1 to S1 lumbar neuroforamina on plain film radiography (PFR), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), accounting for patients' sex and ethnicity. BACKGROUND: The quantitative criteria fothe diagnosis of neuroforaminal stenosis remains unknown. Acquiring a thorough understanding of normative foraminal dimensions is a key step in formulating objective parameters for neuroforaminal stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured 988 images from 494 patients between 18 and 35 years old without spinal pathology who received PFR, CT, or MRI within 1 year of each other. Neuroforaminal measurements were defined as the height, area, and sagittal and axial widths. Statistical analyses were performed to assess relationships among PFR, CT, and MRI-derived neuroforaminal measurements, as well as the influence of patients' sex and ethnicity. RESULTS: 330 PFR, 377 CT, and 281 MRI were measured. Of these, 213 PFR and CT, 117 PFR and MRI, and 164 MRI and CT intrapatient images were compared. Statistically significant differences were observed among PFR, CT, and MRI measurements across all levels L1 to S1. PFR measurements were larger compared with those derived from CT and MRI. Weak-to-moderate correlations were observed between PFR and CT, PFR and MRI, and CT and MRI, with the magnitude of correlation decreasing caudally from L1 to S1. Variations in neuroforaminal anatomy were observed based on sex and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: This study reports 25,951 measurements of normal L1 to S1 neuroforaminal anatomy assessed by PFR, CT, and MRI. The values reported in this study may be used as normative reference measurements of the lumbar neuroforamina. PFR measurements of the neuroforamina are larger compared with those derived from CT and MRI across all levels from L1 to S1. There is a poor correlation between PFR, CT, and MRI when measuring the lumbar neuroforamina. Differences in neuroforaminal anatomy are evident based on patients' sex and ethnicity.

Comparison of L1-S1 neuroforaminal dimensions derived from plain film radiography versus computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To compare measurements of lumbar neuroforaminal dimensions (NFD) derived from plain film radiography (PFR) and computed tomography (CT) of young patients without spinal pathology. METHODS: We analyzed 213 patients between 18 and 35 years of age without spinal pathology who received PFR and CT within one year of each other. NFD were defined as foraminal height, sagittal anterior-to-posterior width, and area. Statistical analyses assessed correlations and differences between PFR- and CT-derived NFD measurements. RESULTS: 111 subjects were female and 102 were male. Significant differences between PFR- and CT-derived NFD measurements were observed for all levels L1-S1, with those for foraminal height listed as follows: 4.10 mm at L1-L2, 1.58 mm at L2-L3, 3.23 mm at L3-L4, 4.27 mm at L4-L5, and 1.75 mm at L5-S1. Regarding foraminal area, these differences were 72.20, 73.45, 61.80, 35.38, and 16.18 mm2, respectively. PFR-derived measurements of NFD were larger compared to those derived from CT across all levels (p < .001). Only weak (0 ≤ r ≤ .4) or moderate (.4 ≤ r ≤ .7) correlations were observed between PFR- and CT-derived NFD measurements for all levels from L1-S1. CONCLUSION: This study describes 9585 measurements from L1-S1 of neuroforaminal measurements derived from CT and plain film radiography from a sample of young patients without spinal pathology. Among these patients, plain film measurements of the neuroforamina are larger compared to those derived from CT for all levels from L1-S1. There is poor correlation and reliability between plain film and CT measurements of neuroforaminal dimensions.

Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography in 1,000 Patients: A Follow-Up Study.

OBJECTIVES: While the radiographic criteria for diagnosing central lumbar stenosis are well described, criteria for diagnosing neuroforaminal stenosis (NFS) are unclear. Prior research has utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize neuroforaminal dimensions (NFDs). However, this approach has inherent limitations that can adversely impact measurement accuracy. Existing literature on the use of computed tomography (CT) to investigate normal NFDs is limited. The purpose of the present study was to describe normal lumbar NFDs that would aid in the establishment of objective quantitative criteria for the diagnosis of NFS. METHODS: This study evaluated CT imaging of 494 female and 506 male subjects between 18 and 35 years of age to determine normal NFDs, specifically the sagittal anteroposterior width, craniocaudal height, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in NFDs according to variables including sex, height, weight, body mass index, and ethnicity. RESULTS: Without differentiating between sides or disc levels, mean NFDs were 8.71 mm for sagittal anteroposterior width, 17.73 mm for craniocaudal height, and 133.26 mm2 for area (n = 10,000 measurements each). Male subjects had larger NFDs than females at multiple levels. Asian and Caucasian subjects had larger NFDs than Hispanic and African American subjects at multiple levels. There were no associations between NFDs and anthropometric factors. CONCLUSIONS: The present study describes normal lumbar NFDs in young, healthy patients. NFDs were influenced by sex and ethnicity but not by anthropometric factors.

Comparison of Nonneurological Structures at Risk During Anterior-to-Psoas Versus Transpsoas Surgical Approaches Using Abdominal CT Imaging From L1 to S1.

BACKGROUND: The kidneys, ribs, liver, spleen, and iliac crests can pose access-related issues to the disc space during both anterior-to-psoas (ATP) and transpsoas (TP) surgical approaches. The aim of this study was to identify and compare the presence and degree of obstruction caused by these structures for the ATP and TP approaches bilaterally from L1 to S1 using abdominal computed tomography. METHODS: Presence of obstruction by a given structure was recorded if the structure was within ATP or TP borders. Degree of obstruction was calculated as the quotient of the structure measurement within the ATP or TP approach divided by the entire corridor length at the point of obstruction. RESULTS: The percentage of time the left kidney was present during the ATP vs TP approaches at L1 to L2 was 44% vs 89% (P < 0.001), at L2 to L3 was 26% vs 75% (P < 0.001), and at L3 to L4 was 5% vs 19% (P < 0.001). For the right kidney, these values were 37% vs 78% (P < 0.001), 43% vs 71% (P < 0.001), and 11% vs 18% (P < 0.001). The percentage of time the left rib was present during ATP vs TP approaches was 41% vs 81% (P < 0.001) at L1 to L2 and 11% vs 26% (P = 0.413) at L2 to L3. With respect to the liver, the ATP approach was obstructed 56%, 30%, and 9% of the time at the levels of L1 to L2, L2 to L3, and L3 to L4; the liver was not present in L1 to L4 TP approach. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to both characterize and compare nonneurological structures at risk during ATP and TP fusion approaches bilaterally from L1 to S1 using abdominal computed tomography. Findings suggest the ATP approach poses less structures at risk relative to the TP approach with respect to the kidneys, ribs, and iliac crests bilaterally. The TP approach offers advantages compared with ATP approach with respect to the liver and spleen. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings from this study are clinically relevant for ATP and TP surgical approach planning.

Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Although the radiographic parameters for diagnosing central lumbar canal stenosis are well described, parameters for the diagnosis of neuroforaminal stenosis (NFS) are less well defined. Previous studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography to describe neuroforaminal dimensions (NFDs). Those methods, however, have limitations that may substantially distort measurements. Existing literature on the use of computed tomography (CT) to investigate normal NFDs is limited. METHODS: This anatomic assessment evaluated CT imaging of 300 female and 300 male subjects between 18 and 35 years of age to determine normal NFDs, specifically the sagittal anteroposterior width, axial anteroposterior width, craniocaudal height, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in NFDs according to variables including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index, and ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, mean NFDs were 9.08 mm for sagittal anteroposterior width, 8.93 mm for axial anteroposterior width, 17.46 mm for craniocaudal height, and 134.78 mm 2 for area (n = 6,000 measurements each). Male subjects had larger NFDs than females at multiple levels. Both Caucasian and Asian subjects had larger NFDs than African-American subjects at multiple levels. There were no associations between foraminal dimensions and anthropometric factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes CT-based L1-S1 NFDs in young, healthy patients who presented with reasons other than back pain or pathology affecting the neuroforamen. Dimensions were influenced by sex and ethnicity but were not influenced by anthropometric factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior-To-Psoas Approach Measurements, Feasibility, Non-Neurological Structures at Risk and Influencing Factors: A Bilateral Analysis From L1-L5 Using Computed Tomography Imaging.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal fusion through the anterior-to-psoas (ATP) technique harbors several approach-related risks. We used abdominal computed tomography imaging to analyze the L1-L5 ATP fusion approach measurements, feasibility, degree of obstruction by non-neurological structures, and the influence of patient characteristics on ATP approach dimensions. METHODS: The vascular window, psoas window, safe window, and incision line anterior and posterior margins for the ATP approach were measured on abdominal computed tomography imaging. The feasibility of approach and the presence of kidneys, ribs, liver, spleen, and iliac crests within the ATP approach were also measured. Correlation and regression models among radiographic measurements and patient age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed as well as differences in approach measurements based on sex. RESULTS: Safe window and incision line measurements were more accommodating for the left-sided vs right-sided ATP approach. At L4-5, the ATP approach was not feasible 18% of the time on the left side vs 60% of the time on the right side. The spleen was present 22%, 10%, and 3% of the time from L1-4, while the liver was present 56%, 30%, and 9% of the time. The iliac crests were not observed within ATP parameters. Patient age, height, weight, and BMI did not strongly correlate with approach measurements, although ATP dimensions did differ based on sex. CONCLUSION: This study reports characteristics of the ATP approach including approach measurements, feasibility, non-neurological structures at risk, and influencing factors to approach measurements. While incision line measurements are larger for male patients compared with female patients at the lower lumbar levels, safe window sizes are similar across all levels L1-L5. The kidneys, ribs, spleen, and liver are potential at-risk structures during the ATP approach, although the iliac crests pose limited concern for ATP technique. Patient characteristics such as age, height, weight, and BMI do not markedly affect ATP approach considerations.

CT-based analysis of oblique lateral interbody fusion from L1 to L5: location of incision, feasibility of safe corridor approach, and influencing factors.

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to measure the safe corridor (SC), surgical incision anterior margin (AM), and posterior margin (PM) for OLIF bilaterally from L1 to L5. The secondary aim was to determine the feasibility of approach via the SC. The tertiary aim was to analyze the influence of demographic and anthropometric factors on OLIF parameters. METHODS: We performed a radiographic analysis of 100 subjects who received an abdominal CT. Measurements of the AM, PM, and SC were obtained as well as patient age, sex, height, weight, and BMI. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate interrater reliability. To assess associations among variables, Pearson's correlation tests and multivariate linear regression models were constructed. Sex differences were analyzed using Student's t tests. RESULTS: At L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5, the PM was 6.6, 8.2, 9.4, and 10.2 cm on the left side and 7.2, 7.7, 8.8, and 9.5 cm on the right side in relation to the disk space center. The SC was less than 1 cm 1%, 3%,3%, and 18% of the time on the left side, and 15%, 12%,29%, and 60% on the right side. None of the anthropometric factors demonstrated a strong correlation with incision location. SC was larger on the left side. Interrater ICC was .934. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide guidelines on the appropriate location of the incision line during OLIF based on SC from L1 to L5. SC measurements do not vary by sex. OLIF is more feasible via a left-sided approach.

Predicting Pedicle Screw Pullout and Fatigue Performance: Comparing Lateral Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Anterior to Posterior Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units.

BACKGROUND: As the prevalence and associated health care costs of osteoporosis continue to rise in our aging population, there is a growing need to continue to identify methods to predict spine construct integrity accurately and cost-effectively. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in both anterior to posterior (AP) and lateral planes, as well as computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU), have all been investigated as potential preoperative predictive tools. The purpose of this study is to determine which of the 3 bone density analysis modalities has the highest potential for predicting pedicle screw biomechanics. METHODS: Lumbar spine specimens (L2, L3, and L4) from 6 fresh frozen cadavers were used for testing. AP-DEXA, lateral-DEXA, and CT images were obtained. Biomechanical testing of pedicle screws in each vertebrae was then performed including pullout strength and fatigue testing. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Pullout strength was best predicted by CT HU, followed by AP-DEXA, then lateral-DEXA (R 2 = 0.78, 0.70, and 0.40, respectively). Fatigue testing showed a significant correlation of relative rotation between HU value and AP-DEXA bone mineral density (R 2 = 0.54 and R 2 = 0.72, respectively), and there was a significant correlation between relative translation and HU value (R 2 = 0.43). There was a poor correlation between relative rotation and lateral-DEXA (R 2 = 0.13) as well as a poor correlation between relative translation and both AP- and lateral-DEXA (R 2 = 0.35 and R 2 = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CT is the only modality with a statistically significant correlation to all biomechanical parameters measured (pullout strength, relative angular rotation, and relative translation). AP-DEXA also predicts the biomechanical measures of screw pullout and relative angular rotation and is superior to lateral-DEXA. CT may provide an incremental benefit in assessing fatigue strength, but this should be weighed against the disadvantages of cost and radiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study can help to inform clinicians on different bone density analyses and their implications on pedicle screw failure.

Comparison of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral bone quality scores for increased utility of bone mineral density screening.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the associations among the validated lumbar vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, and cervical and thoracic VBQ scores. METHODS: Radiographic records of 100 patients who underwent synchronous MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were retrieved. DEXA-validated lumbar VBQ was calculated using median signal intensity (MSI) of the L1-L4 vertebrae and L3 CSF. VBQ was derived as the quotient of MSIL1-L4 divided by MSICSF. Cervical and thoracic VBQ were similarly obtained using C3-C6 and C5 CSF, and T5-T8 and T7 CSF, respectively. Paired sample t-tests were used to evaluate differences among regional VBQ scores. Independent sample t-tests were used to identify sex differences in VBQ. Regression models with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were constructed to identify associations among all permutations of anthropometric and regional VBQ measures. RESULTS: Mean cervical, thoracic, and lumbar VBQ scores were 3.06 ± 0.89, 2.60 ± 0.77, and 2.47 ± 0.61, respectively. Mean differences of .127 (p = 0.045) and - 0.595 (p < 0.001) were observed between thoracic and lumbar, and cervical and lumbar VBQ scores. Correlations of 0.324, 0.356, and 0.600 (p < 0.001) were found between cervical and lumbar, cervical and thoracic, and thoracic and lumbar VBQ scores. Regression with ANOVA predicting lumbar VBQ in relation to cervical and thoracic VBQ demonstrated R Square values of 0.105 and 0.360 (p < 0.001), and ß coefficient values of 0.471 and 0.217 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Thoracic VBQ provides values representative of the validated lumbar VBQ score. Cervical VBQ scores are distinct from lumbar VBQ scores and do not provide adequate surrogate values of lumbar VBQ.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the novel vertebral bone quality score.

PURPOSE: To assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the novel vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scoring system. METHODS: Four orthopedic surgery residents at various levels of training (PGY1-4) evaluated 100 noncontrast, T1-weighted MRIs of the lumbar spine. VBQ was calculated as quotient of the median of L1-L4 average signal intensity (SI) and the L3 cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) SI, as described by Ehresman et al. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. We performed a stratified analysis based on patient history of instrumentation, pathology, and MRI manufacturer/magnet strength to determine their effect on VBQ reliability. Spinal pathologies included compression fracture, burst fracture, vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, or neoplasm. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way mixed model on absolute agreement was used to analyze inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. ICC less than 0.40 was considered poor, 0.40-0.59 as fair, 0.60-0.74 as good, and greater than 0.75 as excellent. RESULTS: Intra-observer reliability was excellent (≥ 0.75) for all four observers. When stratified by history of spinal instrumentation or spinal pathology, all raters showed excellent intra-observer reliability except one (0.71 and 0.69, respectively). When stratified by MRI manufacturer, intra-observer reliability was ≥ 0.75 for all raters. Inter-observer reliability was excellent (0.91) and remained excellent (≥ 0.75) when stratified by history of spinal instrumentation, spinal pathology, or MRI-manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ scores from spine lumbar MRIs demonstrate excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. These scores are reliably reproduced in patients regardless of previous instrumentation, spinal pathology, or MRI manufacturer/magnetic field strength.

Hoffmann sign: clinical correlation of neurological imaging findings in the cervical spine and brain.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective validity study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between Hoffmann sign and radiographical evidence of cervical spinal cord compression and brain lesions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical significance of Hoffmann sign remains controversial with conflicting reports regarding its sensitivity and specificity and its usefulness. METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Imaging studies were blindly examined by 2 observers for possible cervical and brain lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, as well as accuracy for Hoffmann sign as it relates to cervical spinal cord compression and brain pathology, were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients with a positive Hoffmann sign, 32 (35%) showed severe cervical cord compression and/or myelomalacia. Forty-seven of these patients had brain imaging studies, and 5 (10%) had positive findings. There were 80 patients in the negative Hoffmann sign or control group. Twenty-one (27%) of them had severe cervical cord compression and/or myelomalacia. Twenty-three of these control patients underwent neurological imaging of the brain, and 2 (8%) had positive findings. Hoffmann sign was found to have 59% sensitivity, 49% specificity, 35% positive predictive value, and 72% negative predictive value for cervical cord compression. For brain pathology, sensitivity was 71%, specificity 33%, positive predictive value 10%, and negative predictive value 95%. CONCLUSION: Hoffmann sign has too low a positive predictive value to be relied upon as a stand-alone physical examination finding and is not a reliable screening tool for solely predicting the presence of cervical spinal cord compression or brain pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Independent assessment of a new pedicle probe and its ability to detect pedicle breach: a cadaveric study.

OBJECT: The authors undertook an independent, non-industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach. METHODS: A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.

The effect of whole-body cooling on brain metabolism following perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS) have proven valuable in evaluating neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury (HII). RESULTS: MRI scores in the basal ganglia of HII/HT(+) neonates were significantly lower than HII/HT(-) neonates, indicating less severe injury and were associated with lower discharge encephalopathy severity scores in the HII/HT(+) group (P = 0.01). Lactate (Lac) was detected in the occipital gray matter (OGM) and thalamus (TH) of significantly more HII/HT(-) neonates (31.6 and 35.3%) as compared to the HII/HT(+) group (10.5 and 15.8%). In contrast, the -N-acetylaspartate (NAA)-based ratios in the OGM and TH did not differ between the HII groups. DISCUSSION: Our data show that the HT was associated with a decrease in the number of HII neonates with detectable cortical and subcortical Lac as well as a decrease in the number of MRI-detectable subcortical lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the medical and neuroimaging data of 19 HII neonates who received 72 h of whole-body cooling (HII/HT(+)) with those of 19 noncooled HII neonates (HII/HT(-)) to determine whether hypothermia was associated with improved recovery from the injury as measured by MRI and MRS within the first 14 days of life. MRI scores and metabolite ratios of HII/HT(+) and HII/HT(-) neonates were also compared with nine healthy, nonasphyxiated "control" neonates.

Hypoxic-ischemic injury: utility of susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used to assess neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury, and several scoring systems were developed to predict neurologic outcomes in these patients. We examined the magnetic resonance imaging studies of 33 neonates/infants who manifested acute perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injuries. Using a seven-point susceptibility-weighted imaging categorical grading scale, each patient received a "prominence of vein" score, which was dichotomized into a "normal" or "abnormal" group. Six-month outcomes were assessed using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale. We then determined whether "prominence of vein" scores correlated with neurologic outcomes in patients with hypoxic-ischemic injuries, and compared these results with the Barkovich magnetic resonance imaging scoring system. Patients with "normal" "prominence of vein" scores demonstrated better outcomes (mean Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale value = 2) than patients with "abnormal" "prominence of vein" scores (mean Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale value = 4). The dichotomized "prominence of vein" groups demonstrated correlations with the Barkovich magnetic resonance imaging scores of the proton density-weighted basal ganglia, watershed, and combined basal ganglia/watershed regions. The susceptibility-weighted imaging categorical grading scale may aid in predicting neurologic outcomes after hypoxic-ischemic injuries.

Advanced neuroimaging in children with nonaccidental trauma.

Physical abuse associated with nonaccidental trauma (NAT) affects approximately 144,000 children per year in the USA and, frequently, these injuries affect the developing brain. Most infants with suspected NAT are initially evaluated by skull X-rays and computed tomography to determine whether fractures are present, the severity of the acute injury and the need for urgent neurosurgical intervention. Increasingly, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is conducted as it provides additional diagnostic and prognostic information about the extent and nature of the injury. In this review, we examine 4 MRI techniques as they apply to children who present acutely after NAT. Susceptibility-weighted imaging is a 3-D high-resolution MRI technique that is more sensitive than conventional imaging in detecting hemorrhagic lesions that are often associated with diffuse axonal injury (DAI). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy acquires metabolite information reflecting neuronal integrity and function from multiple brain regions and provides a sensitive, noninvasive assessment of neurochemical alterations that offers early prognostic information regarding outcome. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is based on differences in the diffusion of water molecules within the brain and has been shown to be very sensitive in the early detection of ischemic injury. It is now being used to study the direct effects of traumatic injury as well as those due to secondary ischemia. Diffusion tensor imaging is a form of DWI and allows better evaluation of white matter fiber tracts by taking advantage of the intrinsic directionality (anisotropy) of water diffusion in the human brain. It has been shown to be useful in identifying white matter abnormalities after DAI when conventional imaging appears normal. Although these imaging methods have been studied primarily in adults and children with accidental traumatic brain injury, it is clear that they have the potential to provide additional value in the imaging and clinical evaluation of children with NAT.

Hypopharyngeal cancer.

Hypopharyngeal cancers are usually squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) that has the worst prognosis among the head and neck cancers. Overall, 5-year survival rate remains poor despite recent improvements in diagnostic imaging, radiation and chemotherapy, and improved surgical techniques. Hypopharyngeal cancers tend to present with advanced primary disease, and nodal metastasis is highly likely. The most important features determining prognosis are the size and extent of local spread of the primary carcinoma and the extent of involvement of regional lymph nodes. Distant metastasis at presentation is more common in hypopharyngeal cancers than in other head and neck cancers. Poor survival rate is partly due to emergence of second primary cancers but also to development of distant metastasis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remain the mainstay of initial radiological evaluation of hypopharyngeal cancer. Imaging usually results in upstaging of the tumor at presentation. Meticulous evaluation of the extent of the primary tumor with attention to spread to the subsites of the hypopharynx, larynx, and cartilage invasion are necessary for accurate staging. After surgery and radiation therapy, it is difficult with CT and MR to differentiate residual and recurrent tumor from edema and scarring. Fluorine 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose -positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has high sensitivity in detection of occult, residual, and recurrent tumors but has low specificity. Combined PET and CT increase specificity and are increasingly being used to image posttreatment cases. Other newer imaging modalities such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy, and MRI with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) contrast agent are reported to be useful and should be used more widely in difficult cases.