Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Gefapixant (MK-7264), a P2X3 Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Adults.

Gefapixant (MK-7264, RO4926219, AF-219) is a first-in-class P2X3 antagonists being developed to treat refractory or unexplained chronic cough. The initial single- and multiple-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of gefapixant at doses ranging from 7.5 to 1800 mg were assessed in four clinical trials. Following single-dose administration of 10-450 mg, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of gefapixant in plasma and urine demonstrated low inter-subject variability and a dose-proportional exposure. Following administration of multiple doses twice daily, the plasma exposures were dose-proportional at doses ranging from 7.5 to 50 mg and less than dose-proportional at doses ranging from 100 to 1800 mg. The time to mean peak drug concentration ranged from 2 to 3 h post-dose, and steady state was achieved by 7 days after dosing, with an accumulation ratio of approximately 2, comparing data from day 1 to steady state. The mean apparent terminal half-life ranged from 8.2 to 9.6 h. Gefapixant was primarily excreted unmodified in urine. Gefapixant was well tolerated following single-dose administration up to 1800 mg and multiple doses up to 1800 mg twice daily; there were no serious adverse events (AEs) reported. The most common AE reported was dysgeusia. The PK profile supports a twice-daily dosing regimen.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Two-Component SARS-CoV-2 Protein Vaccine: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I and Phase II Studies.

INTRODUCTION: ReCOV is a recombinant protein vaccine that aims to induce cross-neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants. The phase I and phase II studies were conducted in New Zealand and the Philippines, respectively, for ReCOV primary series. METHODS: Both studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled designed among COVID-19 vaccine-naïve healthy adults who received two doses of study vaccination with a 21-day interval. In phase I, 100 younger (15-55 years) and older (56-80 years) subjects were 4:1 randomized to receive ReCOV (20 µg or 40 µg) or placebo. In the phase II study, 347 subjects (≥ 18 years) were 2:1 randomized to receive 40 µg ReCOV or placebo. Subjects that received ReCOV were followed up for 6 months after the second dosing. The safety outcomes included solicited and unsolicited AEs, SAEs, and AESIs. The immunogenicity outcomes were live-virus neutralizing antibody (NAb) against prototype, while pseudovirus NAbs against several SARS-CoV-2 variants were included in phase II as well. RESULTS: No related SAE, AESI, or AE leading to early discontinuation were reported. The AE incidences were higher in ReCOV groups than placebo group in phase I while they were similar between study groups in phase II. The majority of solicited AEs were mild or moderate with median duration of 1.0-4.0 days. The common (≥ 10%) solicited AEs in phase I were injection site reactions, headache, pyrexia, fatigue, and myalgia, and common reported (≥ 5%) ones in phase II included injection site pain, headache, and pyrexia. Robust neutralizing activities against the prototype were observed in ReCOV groups, peaking at 14 days post the second dosing: in phase I, the GMTs for 20 µg and 40 µg ReCOV groups were 1643.2 IU/mL (95% CI 1188.5, 2271.9) and 1289.2 IU/mL (95% CI 868.3, 1914.1) in younger adults, and 1122.3 IU/mL (95% CI 722.6, 1743.1) and 680.3 IU/mL (95% CI 440.2, 1051.4) in older adults, respectively, while in the ReCOV group of phase II, the GMTs for subjects with seronegative and seropositive status at baseline were 3741.0 IU/mL (95% CI 3113.4, 4495.0) and 6138.3 IU/mL (95% CI 5255.1, 7169.9), respectively. In phase II, substantial levels of pseudovirus NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 variants were demonstrated; the peak GMTs for prototype, Omicron BA.2, and BA.4/5 were 8857, 4441, and 2644, and 15,667.3, 7334.3, and 4478.8 among seronegative and seropositive subjects, respectively. The neutralization persisted till 6 months post the second dosing, with only 2.5- to 5.2-fold declines for Omicron variants. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of 20 µg and 40 µg ReCOV are safe and immunogenic against SARS-CoV-2 prototype. The cross-neutralizing activities against Omicron variants support ReCOV advance to late-stage clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Phase I study, clinicaltrials.gov NCT04818801; phase II study, clinicaltrials.gov NCT05084989.

First-in-human phase 1 trial evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, GDC-2394, in healthy volunteers.

Inappropriate and chronic activation of the cytosolic NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, a key component of innate immunity, likely underlies several inflammatory diseases, including coronary artery disease. This first-in-human phase I trial evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of oral, single (150-1800 mg) and multiple (300 or 900 mg twice daily for 7 days) ascending doses (SADs and MADs) of GDC-2394, a small-molecule inhibitor of NLRP3, versus placebo in healthy volunteers. The study also assessed the food effect on GDC-2394 and its CYP3A4 induction potential in food-effect (FE) and drug-drug interaction (DDI) stages, respectively. Although GDC-2394 was adequately tolerated in the SAD, MAD, and FE cohorts, two participants in the DDI stage experienced grade 4 drug-induced liver injury (DILI) deemed related to treatment, but unrelated to a PK drug interaction, leading to halting of the trial. Both participants experiencing severe DILI recovered within 3 months. Oral GDC-2394 was rapidly absorbed; exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner with low-to-moderate intersubject variability. The mean terminal half-life ranged from 4.1 to 8.6 h. Minimal accumulation was observed with multiple dosing. A high-fat meal led to delays in time to maximum concentration and minor decreases in total exposure and maximum plasma concentration. GDC-2394 had minimal CYP3A4 induction potential with the sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam. Exploratory ex vivo whole-blood stimulation assays showed rapid, reversible, and near-complete inhibition of the selected PD biomarkers, IL-1ß and IL-18, across all tested doses. Despite favorable PK and target engagement PD, the GDC-2394 safety profile precludes its further development.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar MSB11456 versus both the US-licensed and EU-approved products: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6 R). MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVES: To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456 to both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (N = 685) received a single 162 mg subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, or EU-approved tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Blood samples were taken pre-dose and for up to 48 days post-dose. Primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Secondary pharmacodynamic measures included serum-soluble IL-6 R and serum C-reactive protein. Safety data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic equivalence (with all corresponding 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratios within the predefined 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin) was demonstrated between MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated similarity of MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were comparable between treatments. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, and EU-approved tocilizumab were demonstrated, and the three products had comparable immunogenicity and safety, supporting MSB11456 as a biosimilar to tocilizumab.

Tocilizumab is a biologic drug that is used to treat autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Biologic drugs are very important for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, but their costs limit accessibility. Therefore, the availability of biosimilars, which are biologics that are very similar in structure and function to an existing biologic drug, may provide a significant cost advantage for national healthcare programs and consumers. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. Our study tested the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456 to the approved formulations of tocilizumab in the US and EU (US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab) in a large group of healthy adults. Volunteers received a single 162 mg subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, or EU-approved tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Blood samples were taken before and regularly after the injection, and safety was monitored. We showed that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MSB11456, US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab were sufficiently similar to claim equivalence between the three products. Safety and immunogenicity were also comparable between the three treatments. These findings suggest that MSB11456 can be considered as a biosimilar to tocilizumab. Biosimilars have improved price competition and led to a reduction in the net costs of biologics, so tocilizumab biosimilars can be expected to contribute to this and potentially improve access to the best available care.

Phase I and scintigraphy studies to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and lung deposition of inhaled GDC-0214 in healthy volunteers.

Several inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation and pathogenesis in asthma signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple ascending doses up to 15 mg twice daily for 14 days of a JAK1 inhibitor, GDC-0214, in healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 66). Doses were administered with a dry powder, capsule-based inhaler. An accompanying open-label gamma scintigraphy study in HVs examined the lung deposition of a single dose of inhaled Technetium-99m (99m Tc)-radiolabeled GDC-0214. GDC-0214 plasma concentrations were linear and approximately dose-proportional after both single and multiple doses. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at 15-30 min after dosing. The mean apparent elimination half-life ranged from 32 to 56 h across all single and multiple dose cohorts. After single and multiple doses, all adverse events were mild or moderate, and none led to treatment withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of systemic toxicity due to JAK1 inhibition, and systemic exposure was low, with plasma concentrations at least 15-fold less than the plasma protein binding-corrected IC50 of JAK1 at the highest dose. Scintigraphy showed that approximately 50% of the emitted dose of radiolabeled GDC-0214 was deposited in the lungs and was distributed well to the peripheral airways. 99m Tc-radiolabeled GDC-0214 (1 mg) exhibited a mean plasma Cmax similar to that observed in phase I at the same dose level. Overall, inhaled GDC-0214 exhibited pharmacokinetic properties favorable for inhaled administration.

A randomized phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a bevacizumab (HD204) biosimilar to European Union- and United States of America-sourced bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: This first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between HD204 and the European Union (EU)-sourced bevacizumab, between HD204 and the United States of America (US)-sourced bevacizumab, and between EU-sourced and US-sourced bevacizumab (NCT03390673). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 3-way parallel group, single-dose comparative PK study, healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of HD204, EU-sourced bevacizumab or US-sourced bevacizumab. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. PK equivalence was determined using the pre-defined equivalence margin of 0.8-1.25 in terms of AUC(0-∞) for the pairwise comparisons. FINDINGS: Baseline demographics for the 119 randomized subjects were similar across the three groups. The 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of HD204 to US-sourced bevacizumab, HD204 to EU-sourced bevacizumab, and EU-sourced to US-sourced bevacizumab were all within the interval of 80% to 125% for AUC0-inf, thus demonstrating equivalency in the PK properties for all three treatment groups. Similarly, the ratio of the geometric means for AUC0-last and Cmax were all within the 80% and 125% margins, supporting the robustness of the primary findings. All other PK parameters, including the half-life (t1/2) clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and time of maximum concentration (tmax), were comparable. There was no difference between the 3 treatment arms in terms of vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events. None of the subjects treated with HD204 had positive ADA results. IMPLICATIONS: HD204 demonstrates equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those of both US-sourced and EU-sourced bevacizumab. (NCT03390673).

Bioavailability of Orally Administered Active Lipid Compounds from four Different Greenshell™ Mussel Formats.

Greenshell™ mussel (GSM, Perna canaliculus) is New Zealand's most important aquaculture species. They are a good source of long chain-polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LC PUFA). Beyond a traditional food product, GSMs are also sold as mussel powders and oil extract formats in the nutraceutical markets. In this study, a four-sequence, single dose, randomized crossover human trial with eight evaluable healthy male participants was undertaken to determine the bioavailability of the n-3 LC PUFA in four different GSM formats (oil, powder, food ingredient and half-shell unprocessed whole mussel) by measuring area under the curve (AUC) and maximal concentration (CMax). Blood samples were collected at baseline and up to 48 h after initiation of product consumption in each administration period. There were minor differences between the bioavailability of FA (fatty acid) between the different GSM formats. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) peak concentrations and plasma exposures were significantly lower with GSM oil compared to GSM half-shell and GSM powder formats, which resulted in AUC0-48 for the intake of GSM half-shell mussel and GSM powder being significantly higher than that for GSM oil (p = 0.013, f= 4.84). This equated to a 20.6% and 24.3% increase in the amount of EPA present in the plasma after consumption of half-shell mussels and mussel powder respectively compared to GSM oil. GSM oil produced the shortest median time to maximal plasma n-3 LC PUFA concentration of all evaluated products demonstrated by a shorter maximum measured plasma concentration (TMax = 5 h). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and n-3 LC PUFA plasma exposure parameters were statistically comparable across the four GSM products evaluated.

Immunogenicity and safety of a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar MSB11455 versus the reference pegfilgrastim Neulasta® in healthy subjects: A randomized, double-blind trial.

MSB11455 is a proposed biosimilar to the currently licensed reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta® ). This study was designed primarily to compare the immunogenicity of MSB11455 and Neulasta® . As secondary objectives, the safety and tolerability of MSB11455 and Neulasta® were also compared. Healthy adult subjects were randomized to either MSB11455 or Neulasta® , stratified by antipolyethylene glycol (PEG) antibody status at screening and study site. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of MSB11455 or Neulasta® (both 6 mg/0.6 mL) on day 1 of each of two study periods (same product in both periods), separated by a washout of 28-35 days. Immunogenicity samples were taken predose and up to day 84 post-first dose. Noninferiority was confirmed if the upper limit of the exact one-sided adjusted 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in antidrug antibody (ADA)-positive rates was < 10%. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Overall, 336 subjects were randomized and treated (N = 168 in each group). Noninferiority of MSB11455 over Neulasta® was demonstrated for immunogenicity; the difference in confirmed treatment-induced ADA-positive rate between MSB11455 and Neulasta® was -0.6% (upper limit of the exact one-sided adjusted 95% CI: 6.25%). ADAs were mostly directed against the PEG moiety of pegfilgrastim. No filgrastim-specific neutralizing antibodies were detected in either treatment group. Safety and tolerability were as expected for pegfilgrastim, and comparable between treatments. This study supports and strengthens the available evidence for the biosimilarity of MSB11455 to Neulasta® .

A Global Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Proposed Biosimilar BAT1706 and Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Healthy Male Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: BAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab (BEV). The objective of this phase I clinical trial was to establish pairwise similarity between BAT1706, US-sourced BEV (US-BEV), and EU-sourced BEV (EU-BEV) after a single intravenous (IV) infusion in healthy male subjects. METHODS: This phase I clinical trial was a randomized, double-blinded, three-arm study in 128 healthy adult male subjects. Every subject received a single IV infusion of 1 mg/kg of study drug and was subsequently monitored for 14 weeks. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity data were collected from each patient. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint of this clinical study was area under the concentration curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf). Biosimilarity of the study drugs was confirmed if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) ratios of the geometric means for the three pairwise comparisons were contained within the range 80-125%. Other pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the concentration curve to time t (AUC0-t), maximum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax), half-life (t½), and time to Cmax (tmax) were also measured. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for the three drug products evaluated. The 90% CI for the AUC0-inf was 99-112% for BAT1706 versus EU-BEV, 97-110% for BAT1706 vs US-BEV and 92-104% for EU-BEV versus US-BEV comparisons, respectively, demonstrating biosimilarity. There were no significant adverse events attributable to BAT1706, as compared to EU-BEV and US-BEV. BAT1706 demonstrated a similar safety profile to EU-BEV and US-BEV. In addition, no anti-drug antibody positive result was reported for any subject included in the study. CONCLUSION: In this study, BAT1706, a proposed biosimilar of BEV, was shown to be highly similar to EU-BEV and US-BEV in terms of pharmacokinetic equivalence, safety, and immunogenicity in healthy subjects after a single IV infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03030430.

Development of a Subcutaneous Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab: Results From the Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study.

Adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab (both monoclonal antibodies targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) has proven survival benefits when combined with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab together in 1 vial for subcutaneous (SC) administration is being developed as a ready-to-use formulation to reduce the treatment burden on patients while improving healthcare efficiency. An open-label, 2-part, phase Ib dose-finding study (NCT02738970) was undertaken in healthy male volunteers (part 1) and female patients with HER2-postive early breast cancer who had completed standard (neo)adjuvant treatment (part 2). This study aimed to identify an SC pertuzumab dose given with recombinant human hyaluronidase that results in comparable exposure to that of the intravenous (IV) pertuzumab dose, based on pertuzumab serum trough concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curve. Pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of SC pertuzumab given alone or in a fixed-dose combination (comixed or coformulated) with trastuzumab were also assessed. A maintenance dose of 600 mg for SC pertuzumab resulted in an equivalent exposure to that of IV pertuzumab, and no new safety signals were identified for SC pertuzumab or trastuzumab. A loading dose of 1200 mg for SC pertuzumab was selected based on approximate dose proportionality. The PK and safety results support further development of a fixed-dose coformulation combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for SC administration, which will be investigated in an upcoming phase III trial in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

A comparative pharmacokinetic study of DRL_BZ, a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, with Avastin® (EU and US) in healthy male subjects.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRL_BZ with that of EU-approved (reference medicinal product; RMP) and US-licensed (reference product; RP) bevacizumab (Avastin® ) in healthy male subjects. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1 study (BZ-01-001), men aged 20-45 years were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of 1 mg kg-1 of bevacizumab as DRL_BZ, RMP or RP. A total of 149 subjects were randomized (DRL_BZ, 50; RMP, 50; RP, 49). Primary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t) ). Secondary objectives were to compare the safety and immunogenicity of DRL_BZ with those of the reference products. RESULTS: Primary PK parameters were comparable across groups, and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of the primary PK endpoints were within the pre-specified equivalence margins (80-125%) for all pairwise comparisons (DRL_BZ vs. RMP, DRL_BZ vs. RP and RMP vs. RP). No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. Similar numbers of subjects reported similar numbers of treatment-emergent adverse events in the three treatment groups. One subject who received DRL_BZ had anti-drug antibodies at the Day 85 visit; however, no anti-drug antibodies were detected in this subject at the 12-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: PK, safety and immunogenicity of DRL_BZ were comparable to EU-approved and US-licensed bevacizumab in healthy male subjects.

Evaluation of Nicotine Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects following Use of a Novel Nicotine Delivery System.

Introduction: Novel nicotine delivery systems represent an evolving part of the tobacco harm reduction strategy. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nicotine delivered by P3L, a pulmonary nicotine delivery system, and its effects on smoking urges and craving relief in relation to Nicorette inhalator were evaluated. Methods: This open-label, ascending nicotine levels study was conducted in 16 healthy smokers. Three different nicotine delivery levels, 50, 80, and 150 µg/puff, delivered by the P3L system were evaluated consecutively on different days after the use of the Nicorette inhalator. Venous nicotine PK, subjective effects, and tolerability were assessed. Results: Geometric least-squares means for maximum plasma nicotine concentration (Cmax), generated by the mixed-effect model for exposure comparison, were 9.7, 11.2, and 9.8 ng/mL for the 50, 80, and 150 µg/puff P3L variants, respectively, compared to 6.1 ng/mL after Nicorette inhalator use. Median time from product use start to Cmax was 7.0 minutes for all P3L, compared to 30.0 minutes for the Nicorette inhalator. Craving reduction was slightly faster than with the Nicorette inhalator as assessed with the visual analog scale craving score. The mean Questionnaire of Smoking Urges -brief total scores did not differ for both products. P3L was well tolerated. Conclusions: At all three nicotine levels tested, the inhalation of the nicotine lactate aerosol delivered with the P3L provided plasma nicotine concentrations higher and faster compared to the Nicorette inhalator. The plasma nicotine concentration-time profile supports a pulmonary route of absorption for P3L compared to the oromucosal absorption of the Nicorette inhalator. Implications: The combination of nicotine and lactic acid with the P3L device shows potential over existing nicotine delivery systems by delivering nicotine with kinetics close to published data on conventional cigarettes and without exogenous carrier substances as used in current electronic nicotine delivery systems. Altogether, the PK profile, subjective effects, and safety profile obtained in this study suggest P3L is an innovative nicotine delivery product that will be acceptable to adult smokers as an alternative to cigarettes.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous trastuzumab administered via handheld syringe or proprietary single-use injection device in healthy males.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability for a single dose of 600 mg subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab, administered via a novel single-use injection device (SID) or handheld syringe in 119 randomized healthy male subjects. METHODS: The co-primary PK endpoints area under the time-concentration curve from the start of dosing to day 22 (AUC(0-21 days)) and maximum observed trastuzumab serum concentration (C(max)) were dose-normalized and body-weight-adjusted, and compared using geometric mean ratios (GMRs). SID performance, injection site pain, adverse events, and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were assessed. RESULTS: GMRs and 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.01 (0.96-1.07) for AUC(0-21 days) and 1.02 (0.96-1.10) for C(max), which fell within the prespecified bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). No SID quality issues or failures occurred. Adverse events were mostly mild, with no deaths, adverse event-related withdrawals, or life-threatening, cardiac, or serious events reported. The ADA rate was low, and no neutralizing antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab SC via SID demonstrated comparable PK and safety to handheld syringe administration. SID performance was very satisfactory.

Paradoxical metastatic progression following 3 months of neo-adjuvant androgen suppression in the TROG 96.01 trial for men with locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: In the TROG 96.01 trial 6 month neo-adjuvant androgen suppression (NAS) and radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced prostate cancer prevented distant progressions (DPs) when compared to RT alone, but 3 months did not. We ask why? METHODS: Between 1996 and 2000, 802 men with T2-4 N0 M0 prostate cancers received RT alone (0 month NAS) to 66 Gy, 3 months or 6 months NAS before RT. Interval hazards and cumulative incidences of DP were compared using competing risks methodology. RESULTS: In the first 4 follow-up years 39, 40 and 26 DPs were diagnosed in subjects treated with 0, 3 and 6 month NAS, respectively. Compared with 0 month, significant reductions in PSA doubling time in subjects with DP occurred following 3 month NAS (p=0.01), but a significant reduction (p=0.01) and a near significant delay in DPs (p=0.06) occurred after 6 month NAS. Subsequently 25, 20 and 11 DPs occurred in the three trial arms. After early secondary therapy for PSA or local progression 34, 19 and 12 DPs were diagnosed after median delays of almost 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The data are consistent with the failure of 3 month NAS to prevent the progression of sub-clinical metastatic deposits already present before treatment.

Comparison of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Trastuzumab: A Phase I/Ib Trial in Healthy Male Volunteers and Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Trastuzumab is a key component of treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in both the early and metastatic settings. It is administered intravenously, with between 17 and 52 infusions in standard regimens over 1 year. Intravenous administration of trastuzumab requires substantial time commitments for patients and health care professionals and can result in patient discomfort. A subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab, containing recombinant human hyaluronidase to overcome subcutaneous absorption barriers, would reduce the administration duration and remove the need to establish intravenous access, thus improving the overall convenience of trastuzumab administration. This open-label, 2-part, phase I/Ib study (NCT00800436) was undertaken in healthy male volunteers and female patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer to identify the dose of subcutaneous trastuzumab that resulted in exposure comparable with the approved intravenous trastuzumab dose. A subcutaneous trastuzumab dose of 8 mg/kg was found to result in exposure comparable with the intravenous trastuzumab dose of 6 mg/kg. The subcutaneous formulation was well tolerated, with a trend toward fewer adverse events versus intravenous administration; most adverse events were mild in intensity. These results support an ongoing phase III efficacy and safety study comparing a fixed subcutaneous trastuzumab dose with intravenous trastuzumab administration.

Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab: a phase I/Ib trial in healthy male volunteers and patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Trastuzumab is a key component of treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in both the early and metastatic settings. It is administered intravenously, with between 17 and 52 infusions in standard regimens over 1 year. Intravenous administration of trastuzumab requires substantial time commitments for patients and health care professionals and can result in patient discomfort. A subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab, containing recombinant human hyaluronidase to overcome subcutaneous absorption barriers, would reduce the administration duration and remove the need to establish intravenous access, thus improving the overall convenience of trastuzumab administration. This open-label, 2-part, phase I/Ib study (NCT00800436) was undertaken in healthy male volunteers and female patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer to identify the dose of subcutaneous trastuzumab that resulted in exposure comparable with the approved intravenous trastuzumab dose. A subcutaneous trastuzumab dose of 8 mg/kg was found to result in exposure comparable with the intravenous trastuzumab dose of 6 mg/kg. The subcutaneous formulation was well tolerated, with a trend toward fewer adverse events versus intravenous administration; most adverse events were mild in intensity. These results support an ongoing phase III efficacy and safety study comparing a fixed subcutaneous trastuzumab dose with intravenous trastuzumab administration.

Risk Stratification after Biochemical Failure following Curative Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Data from the TROG 96.01 Trial.

Purpose. Survival following biochemical failure is highly variable. Using a randomized trial dataset, we sought to define a risk stratification scheme in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC). Methods. The TROG 96.01 trial randomized 802 men with LAPC to radiation ± neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy (AST) between 1996 and 2000. Ten-year follow-up data was used to develop three-tier post-biochemical failure risk stratification schemes based on cutpoints of time to biochemical failure (TTBF) and PSA doubling time (PSADT). Schemes were evaluated in univariable, competing risk models for prostate cancer-specific mortality. The performance was assessed by c-indices and internally validated by the simple bootstrap method. Performance rankings were compared in sensitivity analyses using multivariable models and variations in PSADT calculation. Results. 485 men developed biochemical failure. c-indices ranged between 0.630 and 0.730. The most discriminatory scheme had a high risk category defined by PSADT < 4 months or TTBF < 1 year and low risk category by PSADT > 9 months or TTBF > 3 years. Conclusion. TTBF and PSADT can be combined to define risk stratification schemes after biochemical failure in men with LAPC treated with short-term AST and radiotherapy. External validation, particularly in long-term AST and radiotherapy datasets, is necessary.