GATIS score for predicting the prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A Chinese multicenter study of 12-year experience.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a shortage of accurate, efficient, and precise predictive instruments for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). AIM: To develop a predictive model for individuals with rectal NENs (R-NENs) using data from a large cohort. METHODS: Data from patients with primary R-NENs were retrospectively collected from 17 large-scale referral medical centers in China. Random forest and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival, and two nomograms were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 1408 patients with R-NENs were included. Tumor grade, T stage, tumor size, age, and a prognostic nutritional index were important risk factors for prognosis. The GATIS score was calculated based on these five indicators. For overall survival prediction, the respective C-indexes in the training set were 0.915 (95% confidence interval: 0.866-0.964) for overall survival prediction and 0.908 (95% confidence interval: 0.872-0.944) for progression-free survival prediction. According to decision curve analysis, net benefit of the GATIS score was higher than that of a single factor. The time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the predictive power of the GATIS score was higher than that of the TNM stage and pathological grade at all time periods. CONCLUSION: The GATIS score had a good predictive effect on the prognosis of patients with R-NENs, with efficacy superior to that of the World Health Organization grade and TNM stage.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Long-term outcomes of 1-2 cm rectal neuroendocrine tumors after local excision or radical resection: A population-based multicenter study.

Objectives: Studies on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) that are 1-2 cm in size are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. Methods: Data from patients with primary localized R-NETs 1-2 cm in size were retrospectively collected from 17 large-scale referral medical centers in China. Long-term prognosis, quality of life (QOL), and fecal incontinence were evaluated, and the effects of local excision (LE) or radical resection (RR) were elucidated using propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 272 patients were included in this study; 233 underwent LE, and the remaining 39 underwent RR. Patients in the LE group showed lower tumor location, fewer postoperative Clavien-Dindo III-V complications, more G1 tumors, and lower tumor stage. There were no significant differences in the relapse-free survival or overall survival (OS) between the LE and RR groups after PSM. Patients in the LE group reported superior physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functions, global QOL, and Wexner fecal incontinence scores compared with those in the RR group (all P < 0.050). Eighteen (6.6%) patients had lymph node metastases. Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor location (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-10.07, P = 0.010), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 1.80 (OR = 4.50, 1.46-15.89, P = 0.012), and T3-T4 (OR = 36.31, 95% CI 7.85-208.62, P < 0.001) were independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: R-NETs measuring 1-2 cm generally have a favorable prognosis, and there is no difference in postoperative survival between LE and RR. For patients without lymph node metastasis, LE should be the preferred choice; however, for patients with a higher tumor location, preoperative NLR >1.8 or T3/T4 tumors, RR should be considered.

Local Excision Versus Radical Resection for Grade 2 Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies on grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the oncologic results of local excision versus radical resection for the treatment of grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the differences between surgery strategies. SETTINGS: Seventeen large-scale Chinese medical centers participated in this study. PATIENTS: A total of 144 patients with pathologically confirmed grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were retrospectively analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival were assessed to compare surgery strategies. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent endoscopic resection, 55 underwent transanal excision, 50 underwent radical resection, and 12 underwent palliative surgery or biopsy for distant metastasis. Of the 50 patients who underwent radical resection, 30 (60.0%) had clinically positive lymph nodes on the basis of the histopathology results. The optimal cutoff value for tumor size to predict cancer-specific survival was 1.5 cm. In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of ≤1.5-cm size, there were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival between local excision and radical resection groups ( p > 0.05). In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of >1.5-cm size, relapse-free survival was significantly lower in the local excision group than in the radical resection group ( p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: The nature of retrospective reviews and a relatively short follow-up period are limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors have a nonnegligible rate of lymph node metastasis. Local excision is a feasible choice for tumors of ≤1.5 cm size without metastasis, whereas radical resection is more beneficial in those of >1.5 cm size. See Video Abstract . ESCISIN LOCAL VERSUS RESECCIN RADICAL PARA TUMORES NEUROENDOCRINOS RECTALES GRADO ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO CON PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN COINCIDENTE: ANTECEDENTES:Los estudios sobre los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales de grado 2 son limitados y el tratamiento óptimo para estos tumores no está bien establecido.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados oncológicos de la escisión local versus la resección radical para el tratamiento de tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2.DISEÑO:Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre grupos y centrarse en la diferencia entre estrategias quirúrgicas.ESCENARIO:Diecisiete centros médicos chinos de gran tamaño participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 patológicamente confirmados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída para comparar las estrategias quirúrgicas.RESULTADOS:En este estudio se inscribieron un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2. Veintisiete pacientes se sometieron a resección endoscópica, 55 a escisión transanal, 50 a resección radical y 12 a cirugía paliativa o biopsia por metástasis a distancia. De los 50 pacientes que se sometieron a resección radical, 30 (60,0%) tenían ganglios linfáticos clínicamente positivos según los resultados histopatológicos. El valor de corte óptimo para el tamaño del tumor para predecir la supervivencia específica del cáncer fue de 1,5 cm. En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 ≤ 1,5 cm, no hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída entre los grupos de escisión local y resección radical ( p >0,05). En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 > 1,5 cm, la supervivencia libre de recaída fue significativamente menor en el grupo de escisión local que en el grupo de resección radical ( p = 0,04).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 tienen una tasa no despreciable de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos. La escisión local es una opción factible para tumores ≤ 1,5 cm sin metástasis, mientras que la resección radical es más beneficiosa en aquellos > 1,5 cm. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Lymph node ratio and hematological parameters predict relapse-free survival in patients with high grade rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms after radical resection: a multicenter prognostic study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lymph node ratio (LNR) are reportedly related to prognosis. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical importance of the LNR and hematological parameters in patients with high grade rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-RNENs) who were undergoing radical resection. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with HG-RNENs from 17 large-scale medical centers in China (January 1, 2010-April 30, 2022). A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional hazard model. Bootstrap method was used to draw calibration plots to validate the reproducibility of the model. Concordance index (C-Index), decision curve analysis (DCA), and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (TD-AUC) analysis were used to compare the prognostic predictive power of the new model with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) TNM staging. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with HG-RNENs were enrolled in this study. In the 45 patients with HG-RNENs who underwent radical resection, PNI ≤ 49.13 (HR: 3.997, 95% CI: 1.379-11.581, P = 0.011), ALP > 100.0 U/L (HR: 3.051, 95% CI: 1.011-9.205, P = 0.048), and LNR > 0.40 (HR: 6.639, 95% CI: 2.224-19.817, P = 0.0007) were independent predictors of relapse-free survival. The calibration plots suggested that the nomogram constructed based on the three aforementioned factors had good reproducibility. The novel nomogram revealed a C-index superior to AJCC TNM staging (0.782 vs 0.712) and ENETS TNM staging (0.782 vs 0.657). Also, the new model performed better compared to AJCC TNM staging and ENETS TNM staging in DCA and TD-AUC analyses. CONCLUSIONS: LNR, ALP, and PNI were independent prognostic factors in patients with HG-RNENs after radical resection, and the combined indicator had better predictive efficacy compared with AJCC TNM staging and ENETS TNM staging.

ESBR Nanocomposites Filled with Monodisperse Silica Modified with Si747: The Effects of Amount and pH on Performance.

To prepare silica/rubber composites for low roll resistance tires, a novel strategy was proposed in this study, in which autonomous monodisperse silica (AS) was prepared and modified using 3-mercaptopropyloxy-methoxyl-bis(nonane-pentaethoxy) siloxane (Si747), after which silica/emulsion styrene butadiene rubber (ESBR) master batches were produced using the latex compounding technique. Meanwhile, the commercial precipitated silica (PS) was introduced as a control. In this study, the effects of amount of Si747 and pH value on the properties of the silica/ESBR composites were systematically analyzed. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results indicated that Si747 reduced the silanol group by chemical grafting and physical shielding, and the optimum amounts of Si747 for AS and PS modification were confirmed to be 15% and 20%, respectively. Under a pH of 9, ESBR/modified AS (MAS) composites with 15% Si747 presented better silica dispersion and a weaker Payne effect, compared with ESBR/modified PS (MPS) composites with 20% Si747. Meanwhile, in terms of dynamic properties, the ESBR/MAS composites exhibited a better balance of lower rolling resistance and higher wet skid resistance than the ESBR/MPS composites.

Analysis of the therapeutic effect of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on large rectal adenoma.

Purpose: Rectal adenoma, a pre-cancerous lesion, is one of the indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). TEM has its unique advantages in the treatment of rectal adenomas. However, there are few reports on the therapeutic effects of large rectal adenoma (LRA). The objective of this study was to investigate the value of TEM in the treatment of LRA. Materials and Methods: We collected data from patients who underwent surgery at our center from 2007 to 2017. The postoperative pathology of all patients was rectal adenoma and the diameter of the adenoma was 3 cm or greater. Moreover, all patients underwent TEM. We followed up to observe the incidence of no wound healing, rectal stenosis and recurrence rate of rectal adenoma. The risk factors of adenoma recurrence and wound healing were analysed using single- and multiple-factor analysis. Results: The clinicopathological data of 85 patients with LRA were collected through a pre-set table. During the follow-up period, eight patients were lost to follow-up, and three (3.90%) patients developed rectal stenosis. After 2 years of post-operative follow-up, 20 (25.97%) patients had recurrence and 57 (74.03%) patients had no recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that positive margin was an independent risk factor for recurrence of adenoma. Conclusions: TEM is feasible in the treatment of large rectal tumours in Centers of Expertise with the technique.

Preservation of the left colic artery in modified laparoscopic anterior rectal resections without auxiliary abdominal incisions for transanal specimen retrieval.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection is the most widely used surgical procedure for middle and low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of the extracorporeal placement of the anvil in preserving the left colic artery in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection without auxiliary incisions for transanal specimen retrieval in this research. METHODS: Clinical data and follow-up data of patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection from January 2017 to October 2020 were collected. The resections were modified such that the resisting nail holder was extracorporeally placed for the transanal exenteration of the specimen without using auxiliary abdominal incisions while preserving the left colic artery. By analyzing the data of anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic fistulas after surgery, the advantages and disadvantages of this surgical method for patients were clarified. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled. Five of 22 patients simultaneously underwent double-barrel terminal ileostomy. The postoperative exhaust time was 2-7 (median, 3) days. Postoperative anastomotic bleeding occurred in one patient, postoperative anastomotic fistula occurred in four patients, and postoperative anastomotic stenosis occurred in six patients. There were four patients with postoperative distant metastasis, of which three had concomitant local recurrence. Seventeen patients had no obvious symptoms or signs of recurrent metastases during follow-up appointments, and one died of liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Modified laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection, which resects the specimen through anus eversion by inserting the anvil extracorporeally while preserving the left colic artery, is safe and feasible for patients with low rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for the management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. DESIGN: This was a retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the difference between surgery strategies. SETTINGS: Eleven Chinese tertiary hospitals participated in this study. PATIENTS: A total of 364 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors were retrospectively analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relapse-free survival, postoperative hospital stay length, and 30-day postoperative complication rate were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: We enrolled 214 patients who underwent surgical operation for primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. After propensity score matching, 134 cases involved in the comparison (67 laparoscopic vs 67 open surgery) were randomly matched (1:1) by sex, age, tumor size, tumor site, and neoadjuvant therapy. The laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.46, p = 0.04), and fewer complications (6.0% vs 25.4%, p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the laparoscopic surgery and open surgery groups (9.66 ± 5.42 vs. 10.64 ± 4.93, p = 0.28). Subgroup analysis showed that the laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.14, p = 0.04) and fewer complications after surgery (2.9% vs 24.4%, p = 0.01) in the rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm subgroup. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the nature of retrospective reviews and relatively short follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe and feasible option for the radical resection of primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, especially for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764. CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS CIRUGA ABIERTA PARA TUMORES DEL ESTROMA GASTROINTESTINAL DE RECTO UN ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO EMPAREJADO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:Se desconoce la seguridad y factibilidad de la cirugía laparoscópica para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados quirúrgicos y oncológicos de la cirugía laparoscópica versus cirugía abierta para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre los grupos y centrarse en las diferencias entre las estrategias quirúrgicas.AJUSTES:Once hospitales terciarios de la China participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 364 pacientes con tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto confirmados patológicamente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Supervivencia sin recidiva, duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica y tasa de complicaciones postquirúrgicas a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Inscribimos a 214 pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía por tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 134 casos involucrados en la comparación (67 laparoscópicos versus 67 cirugía abierta) fueron emparejados aleatoriamente (1: 1) por sexo, edad, tamaño del tumor, sitio del tumor y terapia neoadyuvante. El grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,46, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones (6,0% frente a 25,4%, p = 0,002). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica entre los grupos de cirugía laparoscópica y cirugía abierta (9,66 ± 5,42 frente a 10,64 ± 4,93, p = 0,28). El análisis de subgrupos mostró que el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,14, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones después de la cirugía (2,9% frente a 24,4%, p = 0,01) en el subgrupo de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto ≤ 5 cm.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La cirugía laparoscópica ofrece una opción segura y factible para la resección radical de tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto, especialmente para pacientes con tumores ≤5 cm. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Short-term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Conventional Care in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (GISSG1901).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of ERAS and conventional programs on short-term outcomes after LDG. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, the ERAS program is broadly applied in surgical areas. Although several benefits of LDG with the ERAS program have been covered, high-level evidence is still limited, specifically in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: The present study was designed as a randomized, multicenter, unblinded trial. The enrollment criteria included histologically confirmed cT2-4aN0-3M0 gastric adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, medical costs, recovery, and laboratory outcomes were compared between the ERAS and conventional groups. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and May 2020, 400 consecutive patients who met the enrollment criteria were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to either the ERAS group (n = 200) or the conventional group (n = 200). After excluding patients who did not undergo surgery or gastrectomy, 370 patients were analyzed. The patient demographic characteristics were not different between the 2 groups. The conventional group had a significantly longer allowed day of discharge and postoperative hospital stay (6.96 vs 5.83 days, P < 0.001; 8.85 vs 7.27 days, P < 0.001); a longer time to first flatus, liquid intake and ambulation (3.37 vs 2.52 days, P < 0.001; 3.09 vs 1.13 days, P < 0.001; 2.85 vs 1.38 days, P < 0.001, respectively); and higher medical costs (6826 vs 6328 $, P = 0.027) than the ERAS group. Additionally, patients in the ERAS group were more likely to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy earlier (29 vs 32 days, P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications or in the mortality or readmission rates. Regarding laboratory outcomes, the procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels on postoperative day 3 were significantly lower and the hemoglobin levels on postoperative day 5 were significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the conventional group. CONCLUSION: The ERAS program provides a faster recovery, a shorter postoperative hospitalization length, and lower medical costs after LDG without increasing complication and readmission rates. Moreover, enhanced recovery in the ERAS group enables early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical significance of mucinous component in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the clinical significance and prognostic value of mucinous component (MC) in colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC). METHODS: Patients with colorectal AC and AC with MC (ACMC) (1-100%) underwent surgical resection between January 2007 and February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed according to a 1:1 ratio. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the optimal cut-off value of MC ratio for prognostic prediction. The clinicopathological features and 3-year overall survival (OS) of AC patients, mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) (MC > 50%) patients, and ACMC (1-50%) patients were compared before and after matching. Multivariable analysis was used for analyzing independent risk factors related to prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with AC, MAC, and ACMC (1-50%) exhibited different clinicopathological features. However, their 3-year OS rates were similar (82.00% vs. 74.11% vs. 81.48%, P = 0.38). After matching, ROC curve determined 70% as the optimal cut-off value. And patients with ACMC > 70% had a much poorer 3-year OS compared with ACMC (1-70%) patients and AC patients (47.37% vs. 86.15% vs. 79.76%, P < 0.001). In addition, ACMC > 70% was revealed as a risk factor for poor survival in univariate analysis (HR = 1.643, 95%CI = 1.025-2.635, P = 0.039), though not an independent risk factor in multivariable analysis (HR = 1.550, 95%CI = 0.958-2.507, P = 0.074). CONCLUSIONS: MAC is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. MAC has a similar survival with AC and ACMC (1-50%) patients before and after matching. Patients with ACMC > 70% exhibited a much poorer OS, and should be given more clinical attention.

Effect of preoperative CT angiography examination on the clinical outcome of patients with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer, which is the fifth most common malignancy and the third most common cause of cancer-related death, is particularly predominant in East Asian countries, such as China, Japan and Korea. It is a serious global health issue that causes a heavy financial burden for the government and family. To our knowledge, there are few reports of multicentre randomized controlled trials on the utilization of CT angiography (CTA) for patients who are histologically diagnosed with gastric cancer before surgery. Therefore, we planned this RCT to verify whether the utilization of CTA can change the short- and long-term clinical outcomes. METHOD: The GISSG 20-01 study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label clinical study that emphasises the application of CTA for patients who will undergo laparoscopic gastrectomy to prove its clinical findings. A total of 382 patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be recruited for the study and randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: the CTA group (n = 191) and the non-CTA group (n = 191). Both groups will undergo upper abdomen enhanced CT, and the CTA group will also receive CT angiography. The primary endpoint of this trial is the volume of blood loss. The second primary endpoints are the number of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative recovery course, hospitalization costs, length of hospitalization days, postoperative complications, 3-year OS and 3-year DFS. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that the results of this trial will provide high-level evidence and have clinical value for the application of CTA in laparoscopic gastrectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04636099. Registered November 19, 2020.

Interleukin-22 promotes PD-L1 expression via STAT3 in colon cancer cells.

Blocking the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a promising approach for the treatment of colon cancer. The binding of PD-L1 to its receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) on immune cells leads to the apoptosis of activated T cells and causes immune escape. However, there is a limited number of patients with colon cancer that can benefit from the inhibition of PD-L1, and the regulation of PD-L1 expression is poorly understood in colon cancer. The present study demonstrated that interleukin-22 (IL-22) and PD-L1 were upregulated in colon cancer tissues and there was a positive correlation between IL-22 expression and PD-L1 expression. In the present study, exogenous IL-22 was found to upregulate PD-L1 expression via the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway in human colon cancer cells (DLD-1 and primary colon cancer cells). The results of the present study revealed a novel regulatory mechanism of PD-L1 expression in colon cancer, which provides a theoretical basis for decreasing the immune tolerance of colon cancer via IL-22 overexpression.

The effect of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on outcome and survival in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multiinstitutional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and the prognostic characteristics of patients after surgery. METHODS: Patients with rectal GISTs who received neoadjuvant imatinib between 2000 and 2019 were selected from 11 large-scale tertiary hospitals in China. The best response to neoadjuvant imatinib was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 75, 18, and 7 had a partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median tumor size decreased from 5 cm before treatment to 4 cm after treatment (p < 0.001). A total of 31 patients underwent genetic testing after surgery; 23 of patients with exon 11 mutation had PR and 2 had SD. One of the patients with exon 9 mutation had PR, 2 had SD, and 1 had PD. Two patients with the wild type GIST had PD. A total of 86 patients underwent surgery of which 85 underwent complete resection; 72 underwent anal preservation and 40 underwent local excision (LE). After PSM, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had higher rates of LE (p = 0.001) and anal preservation (p = 0.033) than those of patients without neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Nine patients experienced recurrence and one patient died. The 3-year RFS and OS rates were 95.0% and 100%, respectively. After PSM, we found that there was no significant difference in RFS between patients who received or did not receive neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.623). Univariate analysis showed postneoadjuvant tumor size (p = 0.469) and mitotic count (p = 0.294) were not associated with the RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant imatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant imatinib can shrink rectal GIST size, increasing the possibility of complete resection and anal preservation. Further studies are warranted to understand the long-term outcomes of rectal GISTs in patients receiving neoadjuvant imatinib.

Radical resection versus local excision for low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The surgical approaches and resection extent for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are controversial due to the low incidence of this disease. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the postoperative and oncologic outcomes of local excision (LE) and radical resection (RR) in patients with low rectal GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of rectal GIST patients from 11 large-scale medical centers in China (January 2000-December 2019) were reviewed. All patients were divided into either the LE group or the RR group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients with low rectal GIST were enrolled. After PSM, 144 patients were included (72 in each group). The LE group showed a higher anal preservation rate (100.0% vs. 76.4%, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (77.1 ± 68.4 min vs. 159.1 ± 83.6 min, P < 0.001), fewer complications (8.3% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.021) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.9 ± 4.1 d vs. 10.7 ± 8.1 d, P < 0.001) than the RR group. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the RR and LE groups among patients with tumors ≤2 cm (P = 0.220), and the RR group had a superior RFS than the LE group in patients with tumors >2 cm (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: LE resulted in improved postoperative outcomes and comparable oncological safety with a low rectal GIST of ≤2 cm. However, for patients with a low rectal GIST of >2 cm, RR might be a more appropriate option with better RFS.

Oncological Outcomes of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Plus Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with High-Risk T1 and T2 Rectal Cancer.

Background: Radical surgery is recommended for high-risk pathological stage T1 (pT1) or pT2 rectal cancer after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). However, in clinical practice, many patients may unfit or decline radical surgery. In recent years, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after TEM was considered as an alternative to radical surgery for these patients. This study aimed to assess oncological outcomes of adjuvant CRT after TEM for high-risk early rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We collected retrospectively data of 97 patients who underwent TEM with pT1 and pT2 between January 2008 and December 2018. Of these, 35 patients were excluded. Of the remaining 62 patients, 42 were managed by TEM alone and 20 by TEM plus adjuvant CRT. Demographics, recurrence, and survival were analyzed between the two groups. Results: At a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival (DFS) in TEM alone group were significantly lower than those in TEM+CRT group (66.6% versus 93.3%, P = .035; 63.7% versus 93.3%, P = .022). Although the 3-year overall survival in TEM+CRT group was higher than TEM alone group (100% versus 83.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). The local recurrence rate in TEM alone was 31%, compared with 5% in TEM+CRT group (P = .025). Multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant CRT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio: 0.094; 95% confidence interval: 0.001-0.764; P = .027). Conclusions: Our study suggests that adjuvant CRT after TEM may be an alternative for pT1 high-risk and T2 rectal cancer who are not suitable or unwilling to undergo salvage radical surgery.

Effects of perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery pathway management versus traditional management on the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of distal gastric cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of gastric cancer in East Asia is much higher than the international average. Therefore, improving the prognosis of patients and establishing effective clinical pathways are important topics for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer. At present, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is widely used in the field of gastric surgery. Many randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies have proven that the ERAS regimen can improve the short-term clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. However, a prospective study on the effect of the ERAS pathway on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer has not yet been reported. This trial aims to confirm whether the ERAS pathway can improve the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for distal gastric cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective, multicentre RCT. This experiment will consist of two groups - an experimental group and a control group - randomly divided in a 1:1 ratio. The perioperative period of the experimental group will be managed according to the ERAS pathway and that of the control group will be managed according to the traditional management mode. An estimated 400 patients will be enrolled. The main endpoint for comparison is the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT should clarify whether the ERAS pathway is superior to traditional treatment on inflammatory indexes, short-term clinical outcome and survival for laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of distal gastric cancer. It is hoped that our data will provide evidence that the ERAS pathway improves survival in patients with gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, CHiCTR1900022438. Registered on 11 April 2019.

Significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and prognostic nutritional index for predicting clinical outcomes in T1-2 rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation-related parameters have been revealed to have prognostic value in multiple caners. However, the significance of some inflammation-related parameters, including the peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), remains controversial in T1-2 rectal cancer (RC). METHODS: Clinical data of 154 T1-2 RC patients were retrospectively reviewed. The cut-off values for NLR, PLR, LMR, and PNI were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. The relationships of these parameters with postoperative morbidities and prognosis were statistically analysed. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values for preoperative NLR, PLR, LMR and PNI were 2.8, 140.0, 3.9, and 47.1, respectively. Significant but heterogeneous associations were found between NLR, PLR, LMR and PNI and clinicopathological factors. In addition, high NLR, high PLR, and low PNI were correlated with an increased postoperative morbidity rate. Patients with high NLR/PLR or low LMR/PNI had lower OS and DFS rates. On multivariate analysis, only high NLR was identified as an independent risk factor for poor DFS. CONCLUSIONS: NLR, PLR, and PNI are valuable factors for predicting postoperative complications in T1-2 RC patients. A preoperative NLR of more than 2.8 is an independent prognostic factor for poor DFS in T1-2 RC patients.

Prognostic Factors for Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Radical Resection: Shandong Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group, Study 1201.

BACKGROUND: Most previous risk-prediction models for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were based on Western populations. In the current study, we collected data from 23 hospitals in Shandong Province, China, and used the data to examine prognostic factors in Chinese patients and establish a new recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction model. METHODS: Records were analyzed for 5285 GIST patients. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox models. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare a novel RFS prediction model with current risk-prediction models. RESULTS: Overall, 4216 patients met the inclusion criteria and 3363 completed follow-up. One-, 3-, and 5-year RFS was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.8-95.4), 85.9% (95% CI 84.7-87.1), and 78.8% (95% CI 77.0-80.6), respectively. Sex, tumor location, size, mitotic count, and rupture were independent prognostic factors. A new prognostic index (PI) was developed: PI = 0.000 (if female) + 0.270 (if male) + 0.000 (if gastric GIST) + 0.350 (if non-gastric GIST) + 0.000 (if no tumor rupture) + 1.259 (if tumor rupture) + 0.000 (tumor mitotic count < 6 per 50 high-power fields [HPFs]) + 1.442 (tumor mitotic count between 6 and 10 per 50 HPFs) + 2.026 (tumor mitotic count > 10 per 50 HPFs) + 0.096 × tumor size (cm). Model-predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS was S(12, X) = 0.9926exp(PI), S(36, X) = 0.9739exp(PI) and S(60, X) = 0.9471exp(PI), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sex, tumor location, size, mitotic count, and rupture were independently prognostic for GIST recurrence. Our RFS prediction model is effective for Chinese GIST patients.

WITHDRAWN: Demethylation of Di-Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone 3 Is Inhibited by General Control Nondepressible 5-Induced Acetylation of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.