RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molluscicidal effects of different formulations of niclosamide ethanolamine salt in marshlands. METHODS: The molluscicidal effects of spraying with 25% suspension concentrate of niclosamide ethanolamine salt (25% SCN) and 50% wettable powder formulation of niclosamide ethanolamine salt (50% WPN), and dusting with 4% niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder (4% DP) for controlling Oncomelania hupensis snails were investigated and compared in the fields, and the cost-effectiveness was analyzed. RESULTS: The corrected mortalities and the reduced rates of density of snails were 54.37%, 91.70%, 92.76%, 79.50%, and 59.55%, 95.93%, 97.63%, 94.15%, respectively, on 3, 7, 15, 30 d after spaying with 25% SCN, those on 3, 7, 15, 30 d after dusting with 4% DP were 59.10%, 91.83%, 95.56%, 93.34% and 65.03%, 94.93%, 97.61%, 97.28%, respectively; and those on 3, 7, 15, 30 d after spraying with 50% WPN were 76.29%, 91.68%, 93.12%, 81.59% and 81.24%, 97.02%, 97.84%, 95.27%, respectively. The cost of spraying with 25% SCN was 0.21 Yuan/m2, that of dusting with 4% DP was 0.39 Yuan/m2, and that of spraying with 50% WPN was 0.23 Yuan/m2 for snail control in the marshland. The cost of reduced one percentage of the corrected mortalities and the density of snails in controlling snails by 25% SCN, 4% DP and 50% WPN on 15 d were 22.68, 40.63, 25.17 Yuan and 21.54, 39.78, 23.95 Yuan, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The three different formulations of niclosamide are reliable and effective for snail control in marshlands. There are some differences among the different molluscicides in start time, pharmacodynamic characteristics, spraying methods in the field, cost of snail control, and influencing factors. Therefore, we need reasonably select the suitable molluscicides according to the environmental characteristics and working condition.