Effects of Anti-Diabetic Drugs on Fracture Risk: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Available data on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk are contradictory. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze all available data on the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: Embase, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for relevant trials. All data analyses were performed with STATA (12.0) and R language (3.6.0). Risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by combining data for the fracture effects of anti-diabetic drugs, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, meglitinides, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, biguanides, insulin, and sulfonylureas. Results: One hundred seventeen eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 221,364 participants were included in this study. Compared with placebo, trelagliptin (RR 3.51; 1.58-13.70) increased the risk of fracture, whereas albiglutide (RR 0.29; 0.04-0.93) and voglibose (RR 0.03; 0-0.11) decreased the risk of fracture. Other medications were comparable in terms of their effects on fracture risk, and no statistical significance was observed. In terms of fractures, voglibose (0.01%) may be the safest option, and trelagliptin (13.64%) may be the worst. Sensitivity analysis results were consistent with those of the main analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in the regression coefficients of age (1.03; 0.32-2.1), follow-up duration (0.79; 0.27-1.64), and sex distribution (0.63; 0.15-1.56). Conclusions: We found varied results on the association between the use of anti-diabetic drugs and fracture risk. Specifically, trelagliptin raised the risk of fracture, whereas voglibose and albiglutide showed benefit with statistical difference. Other drugs were comparable in terms of their effects on fracture risk. Some drugs (omarigliptin, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and nateglinide) may increase the risk of fracture, while others (such as dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide, linagliptin, alogliptin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, glipizide, gliclazide, glibenclamide, glimepiride, metformin, and insulin) may show benefits. The risk of fracture was independent of age, sex distribution, and the duration of exposure to anti-diabetic drugs. When developing individualized treatment strategies, the clinical efficacy of anti-diabetic drugs must be weighed against their benefits and risks brought about by individual differences of patients. Systematic Review Registration: This Systematic Review was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, registration number CRD42020189464).

Are aquatic exercises efficacious in postmenopausal women with knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the effects of aquatic exercise in postmenopausal women with knee osteoarthritis using an up-to-date meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), VIP and Wanfang database were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until July 2018. The RCTs included comparing the efficacy of aquatic exercise vs. control in postmenopausal women with knee osteoarthritis, the primary outcomes were assessed by the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six RCTs comprising 432 participants. This meta-analysis revealed that aquatic exercise could significantly relieve the symptom of postmenopausal women with knee osteoarthritis. But there was no significant difference between aquatic exercise program and control group for the improvement of pain, stiffness, function outcomes, sport, activities of daily living and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to prior reviews, our analysis demonstrated that aquatic exercise has no positive impact on pain physical function, stiffness, activities of daily living, sport and quality of life in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis. However, aquatic exercise could improve the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Further investigation is needed because of limited available data.

[Systematic review of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer].

Databases including China Biological Medicine database(CBM), Chinese scientific journals full-text database(VIP), China National Knowledge Infrastructure database(CNKI), WanFang Data, PubMed, and EMbase were searched from inception to March 2018 to collect the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. All included studies were critically appraised by two independent reviewers by following the cochrane systematic review method and using Revman 5.3 software and State 12.0 for data analysis. After screening, 20 RCTs involving 2 095 patients were included in the study. Meta-analysis showed that as compared with control group of chemotherapy alone, Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with chemotherapy could improve the clinical curative efficiency, the KPS score, and immune function indexes such as total T cells, Th cells and Ts cells; inhibit the decline of white blood cells(WBC), platelets in blood system, T-lymphocyte subsets such as CD3~+, CD4~+, CD4~+/CD8~+, alleviate myelosuppression and reduce the incidence of side effects such as gastrointestinal adverse reaction, liver and kidney dysfunction and abnormal electrocardiogram. The results revealed that for clinical breast cancer patients, Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with chemotherapy could significantly improve its clinical efficacy and reduce adverse reactions. However, the conclusions still need to be verified by high-quality, multi-center, large-sample, prospective, randomized and double-blind clinical trials. In conclusion, this study has systemically evaluated the efficacy and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with chemotherapy in treatment of breast cancer and provided the reference of evidence-based medicine for safe and effective clinical application of medicines.

Isolation, synthesis, and cytotoxicity evaluation of two impurities in nomegestrol acetate.

Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) is a synthetic progesterone analog and classified as a fourth-generation progestin. It has been approved in many countries for oral contraception, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), and treatment of various gynecological disorders. There are several synthetic routes reported for the synthesis of NOMAc and they all share the very similar last three to five steps toward the conversion of 6-methylene to 6-methyl-6,7-unsaturated structure. Therefore the final product from different processing routes may have similar impurity profiles. In the analysis of NOMAc, we identified two impurities, impurity A (listed in EP 8.0) and impurity B (not specified in EP 8.0). Both impurities were further confirmed by synthesis. In addition, both impurities and NOMAc were evaluated for their in vitro cytotoxicities against L02 liver cells, mesenchymal stem cells, MCF-7 breast cancer cells, and C33A cervical cancer cells. These three analogs are not cytotoxic to the four cell lines at low concentrations (<20 µM). NOMAc and impurity A showed cytotoxicity to L02, MCF-7, and C33A cells at high concentrations, while impurity B did not show significant cytotoxicity to any of the cell lines tested.

[Systematic review on efficacy and safety of Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection in treatment of acute cerebral infarction].

To systemically evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection in treatment of acute cerebral infarction and provide the reference of evidence-based medicine for its clinical safety and effective drug use. Databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, SinoMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase and PubMed were searched from inception to April 2018 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction. The quality of all included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers following the cochrane systematic review method and using Revman5.3 software and State13.0 for Meta-analysis. A total of 30 RCTs involving 3 233 patients with acute cerebral infarction were included in the study after literature quality evaluation. Meta-analysis showed that as compared with the control group of conventional western medicine alone, Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection combined with conventional western medicine can achieve better efficacy in treatment of acute cerebral infarction, increase the clinical total effective rate (RR=1.22, 95% CI [1.18, 1.27], P<0.000 01) and activities of daily living (MD=9.42, 95% CI [8.12, 10.72], P<0.000 01), and improve the degree of neurological impairment (MD=-3.99, 95% CI [-4.89, -3.07], P<0.000 01). Furthermore, the result showed that Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction can significantly decrease the whole blood high-shear viscosity, whole blood low-shear viscosity, plasma viscosity, fibrinogen level and other hemorheological indexes (P<0.01). This Meta-analysis demonstrated that Danshen Chuan xiongqin injection in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction is safe and effective, but lacks the large multicenter clinical randomized trials to support the treatment outcome.

Comparisons of three different doses of alirocumab application in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are associated with incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Alirocumab has been considered as an efficacious, safe and promising therapeutic modality for hypercholesterolemia. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of the three different doses of alirocumab in patients with hypercholesterolemia. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Randomized controlled trials were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, PMC and Cochrane-library databases. The inter-comparison of different doses were performed by subgroups analysis. Meta-analyses were performed by the Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 13.0 software. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of nine studies involving 3870 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Alirocumab administered at 75-150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) resulted in a greater percent change from baseline in LDL-C concentrations (MD, -55.17; 95% CI: -64.35 to -45.99; P<0.05), and HDL-C levels (MD, 7.70; 95% CI 5.94 to 9.46; P<0.05) than other two doses (300 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W], 150 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W]). There was no difference in achieving the treatment goal of LDL-C (≤1.8 mmol/L), in other serum lipid parameters (total cholesterol [TC], triglyceride [TG]), and in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that alirocumab at a dose of 75-150 mg Q2W should be preferred in patients with hypercholesterolemia.