RESUMO
To compare the effect of perioperative holistic care versus conventional care on the levels of anxiety and depression of pituitary tumor patients at a single tertiary care center in China.We enrolled 100 patients who underwent transnaso-sphenoidal microsurgical resection of pituitary tumor at our institution between January 2017 and December 2017. The patients were assigned to the conventional care group (nâ=â50) and the holistic care group by the order of admission. Patients were evaluated by staff nurses at admission and upon discharge from the hospital using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and the self-rating depression scale (SDS). QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30.The 2 groups were comparable in the demographic and baseline variables including baseline SDS and SAS scores (Pâ>â.05). A significantly greater reduction in SAS score was observed in the holistic care group versus the conventional care group (-19.14% vs -11.60%; Pâ<â.05). Moreover, we observed a significantly greater reduction in SDS score in the holistic care group versus the conventional care group (-40.4% vs -18.79%, Pâ<â.05). The QoL functional domain scores at discharge were significantly higher in the holistic care group than the conventional care group (Pâ<â.05).Perioperative holistic care significantly alleviates the levels of anxiety and depression and improves QoL of pituitary adenoma patients.