Effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage combined with a modified leucocyte depletion filter in metastatic spine tumour surgery.

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) combined with a modified leucocyte depletion filter (MLDF) with IOCS combined with a regular leucocyte depletion filter (RLDF) in eliminating tumour cells from blood salvage during metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). METHODS: Patients with a known primary epithelial tumour who underwent MSTS were recruited for this study. Blood samples were collected in 5 stages: from the patients' vein before anaesthesia induction (S1), from the operative field at the time of maximum tumour manipulation (S2), and from the operative blood after IOCS processing (S3) and after IOCS+RLDF (S4) and IOCS+MLDF (S5) processing. The polyploids of tumour cells in the blood samples were collected and counted with immunomagnetic separation enrichment and fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: We recruited 20 patients. Tumour cells were detected in 14 patients (70%) in S1, 16 patients (80%) in S2, 13 patients (65%) in S3, and 12 patients (60%) in S4. MLDF was added in 8 patients. Tumour cells were detected in only 1 of 8 patients in S5 (12.5%). There were significantly fewer tumour cells in the samples collected after MLDF processing (S5) than in the samples collected after RLDF (S4) and around the tumour (S2) (P = 0.016 and P = 0.039, respectively). Although no significant difference was observed between S4 and S1, a downward trend was observed after IOCS+RLDF processing. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour cells could be removed by IOCS combined with RLDF from blood salvaged during MSTS, but residual tumour cells remained. The findings support the notion that MLDF eliminates tumour cells more effectively than RLDF. Hence, this technique can be applied to MSTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1800016162 Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Anesthesia and perioperative management for giant adrenal Ewing's sarcoma with inferior vena cava and right atrium tumor thrombus: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Ewing's sarcoma of the adrenal gland with inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium thrombus is extremely rare. Here, we report a case of giant adrenal Ewing's sarcoma with IVC and right atrium tumor thrombus and summarize the anesthesia and perioperative management. CASE SUMMARY: A young female was admitted to the Department of Urology with intermittent pain under the right costal arch for four months. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed a large retroperitoneal mass (22 cm in diameter), which may have originated from the right adrenal gland and was closely related to the liver. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a strong echogenic filling measuring 70 mm extended from the IVC into the right atrium and ventricle. After preoperative preparation with cardiopulmonary bypass, sufficient blood products, transesophageal echocardiography and multiple monitoring, tumor and thrombus resection by IVC exploration and right atriotomy were successfully performed by a multidisciplinary team. Intraoperative hemodynamic stability was the major concern of anesthesiologists and the status of tumor thrombus and pulmonary embolism were monitored continuously. During transfer of the patient to the intensive care unit (ICU), cardiac arrest occurred without external stimulus. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed immediately and cardiac function was restored after 1 min. In the ICU, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were provided to maintain cardiac, liver and kidney function. Histopathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma. After postoperative treatments and rehabilitation, the patient was discharged from the urology ward. CONCLUSION: An adrenal Ewing's sarcoma with IVC and right atrium thrombus is extremely rare, and its anesthesia and perioperative management have not been reported. Thus, this report provides significant insights in the perioperative management of patients with adrenal Ewing's sarcoma and IVC tumor thrombus. Intraoperative circulation fluctuations and sudden cardiovascular events are the major challenges during surgery. In addition, postoperative treatments including ECMO and CRRT provide essential support in critically ill patients. Moreover, this case report also highlights the importance of multidisciplinary cooperation during treatment of the disease.

[Effects of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block plus general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone on perioperative management of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To compare continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) in the patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery were randomly assigned to either ISB plus GA group (ISB + GA group) or GA group. Preoperatively, an interscalene catheter was placed in the ISB + GA group patients. Both groups received general anesthesia. The intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the level of external acoustic meatus was maintained at a target of 60 - 65 mm Hg with a continuous infusion of remifentanil. Postoperatively, the patients in the ISB + GA and GA groups received CISB and patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) respectively for 48 h. RESULTS: Surgical field conditions were similar in two groups (P = 1.000). Compared to the GA group, the consumption of remifentanil [(0.04 ± 0.03) vs (0.14 ± 0.03) µg×kg(-1)×min(-1), P < 0.01] and the inhalational concentration of sevoflurane(1.80% ± 0.5% vs 2.1% ± 0.5%, P < 0.05)were lower in the ISB + GA group. Compared to the GA group, the values of MAP and heart rate (HR) were lower at all postoperative time-points in the ISB + GA group(P < 0.05). The postoperative measurements of numerical rating pain score (NRPS) were lower (P < 0.01) and the level of patient satisfaction was greater in the ISB + GA group [8(6 - 10) vs 7 (5 - 10), P < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: In comparisons with GA alone for rotator cuff repair surgery, the combined uses of ISB and GA may achieve a better perioperative control of hemodynamic responses, a markedly reduced consumption of general anesthetics, a rapid recovery of consciousness from anesthesia, superior analgesia with fewer side effects and greater patient satisfaction.

[A comparison of target controlled versus manually controlled infusion of propofol in elderly patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of anesthesia via target-controlled infusion (TCI) on drug consumption, intraoperative hemodynamic stability and recovery compared with manual-controlled infusion (MCI) in elderly patients. METHODS: Under the approval of the hospital ethics committee, 60 elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated by random numbers to either the MCI group (n = 30) or the TCI group (n = 30). The patients in MCI group received an infusion of propofol at 200 ml/h while those in TCI group propofol at an initial plasma concentration of 2.0 µg/ml and titrated upwards by 0.5 µg/ml steps until loss of consciousness. Both groups received an infusion of remifentanil. After intubation, the infusion rate or the target concentration of propofol was titrated to maintain BIS (bispectral index) values between 40 and 60. The infusion of remifentanil was adapted to intraoperative hemodynamics. The doses of propofol and remifentanil were recorded, the hemodynamic parameters and the use of vasoactive drugs collected and the recovery times assessed. RESULTS: The time of loss of consciousness and the time to intubation, the doses of propofol and remifentanil during induction and maintenance were not significantly different between two groups. The times of pump adjustment were less in TCI group versus MCI group [(5.8 ± 2.1) vs (7.8 ± 3.7) times, P < 0.01]. Blood pressure and heart rates were not statistically different at any time point between two groups. There were no significant differences in BIS or the use of vasoactive drugs between two groups. The recovery times were similar for two groups. CONCLUSION: Although target infusion system is easy to use and requires less time of adjustment, it fails to show added benefit on propofol consumption, hemodynamic stability, anesthesia depth and recovery in elderly patients.

[Effect of remifentanil on propofol pharmacokinetics with target controlled infusion in elderly patients].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of remifentanil administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI) with different plasma concentration and time on pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients. METHODS: Thirty-two ASA I-II patients (65-82 years old) undergoing elective lower abdominal operations were divided into 4 groups randomly: TCI propofol combined with epidural block (group A, n=8); TCI remifentanil with plasma concentration 4 µg/L and propofol (group B, n=8); TCI remifentanil with plasma concentration 7 µg/L and propofol (group C, n=8); and TCI propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 4 µg/L) with infusion time longer than 4 hours (group D, n=8). Propofol was infused by target-controlled infusion with plasma concentration 3 mg/L in the 4 groups. bispetral index (BIS), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) were recorded during operation. Blood samples were collection from radial arterial catheter. Samples of 2 mL of arterial blood were taken at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30 min and then every 30 min after the start of the infusion of propofol, and at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, 720, 1440 min after the termination of the infusion of propofol. Propofol concentrations in blood were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The pharmacokinetics analyses were performed using the nonlinear mixed-effects model approach implemented in NONMEM computer program. After obtaining the best NONMEM model with covariates, the influence of coadministered remifentanil on the model was examined. RESULTS: In all the patients, the depth of anesthesia was enough (BIS value=40-60), and the circulatory system function was stable during operation. The final model of propofol pharmacokinetics in the three groups (A+B, A+C, and A+D groups) was best described by a three-compartment mammillary model. The values of objective function (OFV) were -810.1, -714.4, and -896.4. Addition of remifentanil covariate effects to the final model resulted in no improvement in the objective function. CONCLUSION: target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with different plasma concentration of remifentanil or remifentanil infusing more than 4 hours had no effect on pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients.

Two-stage analysis of pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Sufentanil is a suitable choice for target-controlled infusion (TCI) because of its shorter context-sensitive half-time. The current study was to estimate the pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients using the two-stage analysis. METHODS: Twelve adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and sufentanil administered by TCI lasting for 30 minutes, with target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Frequent arterial blood samples (1.5 ml) were taken during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Before the end of surgery, another arterial blood sample (1.0 ml) was drawn for the blood-gas analysis. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (limit of quantitation was 5 pg/ml). The data were analyzed with the two-stage approach, linear regression and correlation analysis. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI were adequately described by a three-compartment model. The variables were derived as follows: the volume of central compartment (V(1)) was 5.4 L, volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) was 222.6 L, metabolic clearance (Cl(1)) was 0.84 L/min and elimination half-life (t(1/2Y)) was 389 minutes. Patients' age, gender and PaCO2 correlated significantly with the pharmacokinetic parameters. The Vdss, volume of slowly equilibrating compartment (V(3)) and t(1/2Y) increased, and rapid distribution clearance (Cl(2)) decreased with increasing patient age. Male patients had larger values of Vdss, volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment (V(2)) and V(3) than female patients. The Vdss and V(3) increased with higher PaCO2 values. There were no significant correlations between the pharmacokinetic variables and body weight, height, lean body mass, plasma albumin, sufentanil dose, duration of surgery, pH or base excess of blood (BE-B). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients can be optimally described by a three-compartment model. The pharmacokinetic analysis technique may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters and correlations.

Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil administered by target-controlled infusion in Chinese surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) has been recently developed and successfully implemented in clinical practice. This study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese surgical patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil was investigated in 12 adult patients, aged 23-76 years, scheduled for prolonged surgery under general anesthesia. Anesthetic induction was carried out with propofol, rocuronium and TCI administered sufentanil aiming for target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Sufentanil TCI lasted for 30 minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples (1.5 ml) were drawn during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; limit of sensitivity of mass spectrometry was 5 pg/ml. The data were analyzed with the nonlinear mixed-effect model program. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil were optimally described by a three-compartment model with the following parameters: the central volume of distribution (V(1))=5.4 L, the volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss)=195.4 L, systemic clearance (Cl(1))=1.10 L/min, and elimination half-life (t(1/2) gamma)=271.8 minutes. Both age and gender affected the pharmacokinetic parameters. The rapid distribution clearance (Cl(2)) was negatively correlated with patient age, and the volume of slowly equilibrating compartment (V(3)) was positively correlated with age. The Cl(2) and the volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment (V(2)) were influenced by gender with male patients showing higher values of Cl(2) and V(2) than female patients. There was no relationship of body weight, lean body mass, plasma albumin, or target effect-site concentration of sufentanil with any of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese patients can be adequately described by a three-compartment model. Pharmacokinetics adjusted to the individual patient should improve the accuracy of TCI systems.

[Target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol in elderly patients].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical reliability and feasibility of target-controlled infusion (TCI) with different plasma concentration remifentanil and propofol. METHODS: Thirty ASA I-II patients, > or =65 years old, undergoing selective lower abdominal operation were divided into 3 groups, group A with anesthesia using propofol combined with epidural block, group B with anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 4 microg/L), group C with anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 7 microg/L). BIS value, heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability and so on, were recorded during anesthesia and operation. Radial arterial blood samples for analysis of plasma concentration of propofol were taken during operation. RESULTS: (1) The intubation response of groups B and C was lower than that of group A . (2) The depth of anesthesia was enough during operation (BIS value=45-60). (3) TCI propofol combined with remifentanil didn't lengthen the awaking time of patients; (4) MDPE of target-controlled infusion using propofol with Marsh parameters was 11.17%, MDAPE was 12.16% in Chinese elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil with plasma concentration of 4 and 7 microg/L combined with propofol could be safely used during clinical anesthesia of old patient, but monitoring must be strengthened during induction when plasma concentration of remifentanil was 7 microg/L. TCI propofol with Marsh parameters could be applied to Chinese elderly patients safely and efficiently.