Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 10(11): 2125-2132, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our study aims to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion-guided targeted periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy (TTPB). METHODS: The patients who underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy from May 2018 to March 2019 were randomized into two groups using a random number table. The intervention group (n=47) and the control group (n=45) received targeted PNB and traditional PNB, respectively. Visual analog scale (VAS) and visual numeric scale (VNS) scores were used to assess the patients' pain and quantify their satisfaction. RESULTS: The total detection rate for prostate cancer was 45.7%, with a comparable positive rate between the intervention group (42.6%) and the control group (48.9%), which meant there was no significant difference between the groups (P=0.542). Patient age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, suspicious lesions on mpMRI, number of cores, operation time, and biopsy time were comparable between the groups. The VAS scores during biopsy were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group [2 (1 to 3) vs. 2 (1 to 4), P=0.019]. Conversely, the VNS scores during biopsy were higher in the intervention group [3 (2 to 4) vs. 3 (2 to 3), P=0.015]. There were no significant differences in the pain scores or the satisfaction scores at 30 min after the procedure between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the groups for complications, such as hematuria, urinary retention, infection, hemospermia, and vasovagal reaction (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted PNB significantly relieved the pain and did not increase the incidence of complications for patients when compared with traditional PNB.

2.
BMC Urol ; 19(1): 63, 2019 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288778

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of pelvic plexus block (PPB) in relief pain during transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy (TTPB), compared with conventional periprostatic nerve block (PNB). METHODS: From July 2016 to August 2017, 245 patients who were performed TTPB in Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University were recruited. The patients were randomized into three groups using a random number table. Group-1 received prostate capsule local anesthesia with 22 ml of 1% lidocaine. Group-2 additionally received PNB on the basis of Group-1. To perform PNB, 5 ml 1% lidocaine was injected into the region of prostatic neurovascular bundle situated in the angle of prostate-bladder-seminal vesicle. Group-3 received prostate capsule local anesthesia plus PPB (5 ml of 1% lidocaine injection into the pelvic plexus which located on lateral to the bilateral seminal vesicle apex). The patients' pain and satisfaction were evaluated by visual analogue scale and visual numerical scale, respectively. RESULTS: The age, total prostate volume, PSA and the number of cores were comparable among the three groups. The visual analog scale scores of group-3 were significantly lower than group-2 during biopsy (P = 0.003). Conversely, the visual numeric scale scores were higher in group-3 (P = 0.039). Both the group-2 and group-3 outperformed the group-1 in alleviating pain and had a higher quantification of satisfaction. There were no significant differences in the pain scores or the satisfaction scores at 30 min after the procedure among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The analgesic efficacy of PPB guided by Doppler ultrasound in TTPB was better than that of PNB and both were superior to no nerve block. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IOR-17013533 , 01/06/2016.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/métodos , Plexo Hipogástrico/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Biópsia/métodos , Humanos , Plexo Hipogástrico/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
3.
Int J Urol ; 26(2): 278-283, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30515888

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of permanent 125 I prostate brachytherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study of 45 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer from the Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups according to different treatments: 21 patients received endocrine therapy alone (control group), and 24 patients underwent brachytherapy combined with endocrine therapy (treatment group). Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival and quality of life of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival of the treatment group were 29 months (interquartile range 25-37 months) and 37 months (interquartile range 30-50 months), respectively. These were significantly longer than those of the control group (both P < 0.05). Prostate-specific antigen (before androgen deprivation therapy and before brachytherapy), prostate volume, Gleason score, clinical stage and brachytherapy were associated with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival on univariate analysis. For the quality of life after treatment, urinary symptoms/problems at 1 month after brachytherapy compared with the control group had a statistically significant difference and clinically relevant deterioration, but after 6 months there were no statistically significant differences and clinically relevant deterioration. Compared with the control group, the physical functioning, social functioning, global health and general physical discomfort of the treatment group were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy with 125 I seed implantation can effectively prolong survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and, to a certain extent, improve patients' quality of life.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA