Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 26(6): 1446-1458, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The significant clinical benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIP) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been widely recognized, emphasizing the urgent need for a reliable biomarker. In this study, we find the remarkable capacity of tumor mutational burden (TMB) to serve as an accessible and streamlined indicator. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study, consisting of 600 NSCLC patients treated with ICIP. Association between TMB and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) has been explored. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation between TMB levels and OS, PFS rates, clinical benefit has been found when TMB > = 16(TMB > = 16 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)). However, when TMB < 16, increasing TMB values did not exhibit a gradual stepwise increase in OS and PFS rates. The median months of OS in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 35.58, and 10.71 months respectively with average 12.39 months (p < 0.0001). The median months of PFS in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are not-obtained, and 2.79 months respectively with an average of 3.32 months (p < 0.0001). The DCR in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 71.4% and 44.2% respectively with an average of 47.7% (p < 0.0001). The ORR in the TMB > = 16 and < 16 are 49.4% and 20.8% respectively with an average of 24.5% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The TMB > = 16 shows significantly associated with optimal ICIP treatment outcomes, including higher patient survival rates, delayed disease progression, and significant clinical benefits. These results present the potential of TMB as a promising biomarker candidate for NSCLC patients undergoing ICIP treatment.


Assuntos
Antígeno B7-H1 , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutação , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Drug Discov Today ; 29(2): 103875, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176674

RESUMO

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is considered to be the most common and abundant epigenetics modification in messenger RNA (mRNA) and noncoding RNA. Abnormal modification of m6A is closely related to the occurrence, development, progression, and prognosis of cancer. m6A regulators have been identified as novel targets for anticancer drugs. Natural products, a rich source of traditional anticancer drugs, have been utilized for the development of m6A-targeting drugs. Here, we review the key role of m6A modification in cancer progression and explore the prospects and structural modification mechanisms of natural products as potential drugs targeting m6A modification for cancer treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Produtos Biológicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Tradicional , Adenosina , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA