Safety and effectiveness of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriatic disease: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

The safety and efficacy of apremilast in psoriatic disease has been demonstrated in clinical trials, including in Japanese patients. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted after approval of apremalast in Japan in 2016 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine clinical practice. Patients (enrolled between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019), were observed for 12 months after apremilast treatment initiation or until discontinuation or withdrawal. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse reactions (ARs) and serious ARs. Effectiveness measures in PsO included the proportion of patients who achieved global improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores of 0/1 and the change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 and 12 months treatment. The safety analysis set included 1063 patients (PsO, n = 992; PsA, n = 127). ARs and serious ARs were reported in 29.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; most occurred <1 month after apremilast initiation. There were no reports of fatal ARs, serious infections, hypersensitivity, or vasculitis. No new safety signals were identified. Among the key survey items, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common ARs (21.3%). In patients with PsO, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, effectiveness rates of achieving highly effective or effective global improvement of were 90.9% and 93.8%; PGA 0/1 was achieved by 42.7% and 58.1% of patients; mean decrease from baseline in total DLQI score was 4.2 (p < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Effectiveness was evaluated in a small number of patients with PsA for some measures; after 6 and 12 months of treatment, improvements were observed in global improvement effectiveness rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints score, Visual Analog Scale score, and DLQI score. We conclude that orally administered apremilast was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PsO and/or PsA enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study.

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient's visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (P = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal P = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal P ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Effects of fexofenadine hydrochloride in a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, induced by histamine, leukotrienes, and other substances released from mast cells. Fexofenadine hydrochloride, the active metabolite of terfenadine, is a novel, nonsedating antiallergic drug having H1 receptor antagonistic activity. Fexofenadine is effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, its mechanism of action in attenuating nasal congestion has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we first examined the effects of fexofenadine on a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis. We also evaluated the effects of mepyramine, zafirlukast and ramatroban in this model; these drugs are an H1 receptor antagonist, a selective leukotriene antagonist and a selective thromboxane antagonist, respectively. Rhinitis was induced by ovalbumin (OVA) instillation into the nasal cavity of animals that had been sensitized by two earlier OVA injections (s.c. and i.p.). The nasal airway resistance was measured for 45 min after the challenge. Fexofenadine hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) and terfenadine (20 mg/kg) administered orally 70 min prior to the challenge significantly inhibited (fexofenadine, p < 0.001, terfenadine, p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. Ramatroban (30 mg/kg) administered orally 60 min prior to the challenge also significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. In contrast, mepyramine (3 mg/kg i.v.) and zafirlukast (3 mg/kg p.o.) failed to reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance. These results suggest that thromboxane may be involved in the increase in the nasal airway resistance in this model. Accordingly, fexofenadine may reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance by inhibiting the release of chemical mediators, including thromboxane, that are involved in the increase in nasal airway resistance in this model.

Effects of cariporide (HOE642) on myocardial infarct size and ventricular arrhythmias in a rat ischemia/reperfusion model: comparison with other drugs.

The effects of pretreatment with cariporide on myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion were compared with those of nicorandil, propranolol, and nifedipine. Each drug was administered intravenously before coronary occlusion. Cariporide at 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg significantly reduced the infarct size (infarct mass/risk mass) from 28 +/- 4% (vehicle control value) to 9 +/- 3, 9 +/- 3, and 5 +/- 2%, respectively. Propranolol at 2.5 mg/kg also significantly reduced the infarct size to 11 +/- 1%. Neither nicorandil nor nifedipine was effective when given at 0.1 mg/kg. Cariporide dose dependently decreased the number of ischemia-induced ventricular premature beats (VPB), incidence and duration of ventricular tachycardia, and the number of reperfusion-induced VPB. Nicorandil was effective against only VPB after reperfusion, and propranolol reduced only postischemic arrhythmias, but nifedipine had no effect on either type of arrhythmia. In summary, cariporide reduced the infarct size and dose dependently suppressed arrhythmias induced by ischemia/reperfusion in rats. In contrast, in the present rat model, the doses of the other three drugs used in this study did not show comparable effects.