Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 47(1): 26-33, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175700

RESUMO

Factors affecting the efficiency of walking independence in patients with subacute stroke following robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and conventional treatment (RAGT-CT) were examined. This retrospective cohort study included 37 patients with stroke [ n  = 11 ischemic; n  = 26 hemorrhagic; median poststroke interval, 28 days (interquartile range, IQR, 24-42)] who underwent RAGT using Welwalk for a median of 3 weeks (IQR, 2-4) followed by conventional training (median, 129 days; IQR, 114-146). The primary outcome was the change in functional independence measure (FIM)-walk item score from before to after RAGT (FIM-walk efficiency). The secondary outcome was the FIM-walk score at discharge. The independent variables included sensorimotor function [lower extremity (LE) motor and sensory scores and trunk function from the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS)] and cognitive function (FIM-cognitive, MMSE and Cognitive-related Behavioral Assessment) before RAGT-CT and RAGT dose duration per session, total steps and average treadmill speed at week 1, and number of sessions). We first determined the bivariate associations of each independent variable with the FIM-walk efficiency at the end of the RAGT period as decided by the therapists and with the FIM-walk score at discharge. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that only the FIM-cognitive score was a significant predictor of the FIM-walk efficiency at the end of the RAGT period ( ß = 0.47; P  < 0.01, adjusted R2  = 0.21) after accounting for age, days post-stroke, SIAS-total lower extremity (SIAS-LE) motor score, and number of RAGT sessions (all nonsignificant). Furthermore, only the SIAS-trunk score was a significant predictor of the FIM-walk score at discharge ( ß = 0.52; P  < 0.01; adjusted R2  = 0.65) after accounting for age, days post-stroke, FIM-cognitive score, SIAS-LE motor score, and average treadmill speed at week 1 (all nonsignificant). Although patients with better cognition at the start of locomotor training achieved the pragmatic targets for terminating RAGT and proceeding with conventional therapy at a faster rate, the outcome at discharge is mainly dependent on early trunk function.


Assuntos
Robótica , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Caminhada , Marcha
2.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1219505, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37538254

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to classify and calculate the minimal detectable changes (MDC) in gait time and gait speed in a 10-meter walking test (10MWT) in patients with stroke classified according to their gait speed. Methods: The participants were 84 patients with stroke. Their gait times were measured twice each at their comfortable gait speed (CGS) and maximum gait speed (MGS) on a 10-meter straight track, and gait speed was calculated using gait time. Participants were assigned to three speed groups based on their CGS: low-speed (<0.4 m/s; n = 19); moderate-speed (0.4-0.8 m/s; n = 29); and high-speed (>0.8 m/s; n = 36). For each group, first and second retest reliability and MDC of CGS and MGS were calculated using gait time and gait speed in the 10MWT. Results: MDCs in the 10MWT at CGS were: low-speed group, gait time 5.25 s, gait speed 0.05 m/s; moderate-speed group, gait time 2.83 s, gait speed 0.11 m/s; and high-speed group, gait time 1.58 s, gait speed 0.21 m/s. MDCs in the 10MWT at MGS were: low-speed group, gait time 7.26 s, gait speed 0.04 m/s; moderate-speed group, gait time 2.48 s, gait speed 0.12 m/s; and high-speed group, gait time 1.28 s, gait speed 0.19 m/s. Conclusion: Since the MDC of gait speed and gait time differ depending on the participant's gait speed, it is necessary to interpret the results according to the participant's gait speed when judging the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA