Excess mortality in COVID-19-affected solid organ transplant recipients across the pandemic.

The excess mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) throughout the pandemic remains unclear. This prospective cohort study based on the Japanese nationwide registry included 1632 SOTRs diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and July 31, 2022, categorized based on dominant phases of variants of concern (VOCs): Waves 1 to 3 (Beta), 4 (Alpha), 5 (Delta), 6 (Omicron BA.1/BA.2), and 7 (Omicron BA.5). Excess mortality of COVID-19-affected SOTRs was analyzed by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Overall, 1632 COVID-19-confirmed SOTRs included 1170 kidney, 408 liver, 25 lung, 20 heart, 1 small intestine, and 8 multiorgan recipients. Although disease severity and all-cause mortality decreased as VOCs transitioned, SMRs of SOTRs were consistently higher than those of the general population throughout the pandemic, showing a U-shaped gap that peaked toward the Omicron BA.5 phase; SMR (95% CI): 6.2 (3.1-12.5), 4.0 (1.5-10.6), 3.0 (1.3-6.7), 8.8 (5.3-14.5), and 21.9 (5.5-87.6) for Waves 1 to 3 (Beta), Wave 4 (Alpha), Wave 5 (Delta), Wave 6 (Omicron BA.1/2), and Wave 7 (Omicron BA.5), respectively. In conclusion, COVID-19 SOTRs had greater SMRs than the general population across the pandemic. Vaccine boosters, immunosuppression optimization, and other protective measures, particularly for older SOTRs, are paramount.

Water intake, baseline biopsy, and graft function after living donor kidney transplantation.

Increased water intake is recommended for kidney transplant recipients; however, its efficacy remains controversial. We hypothesized that pre-existing histological findings of the allograft might modulate the impact of water intake. We retrospectively analyzed 167 adults with living-donor kidney transplants (April 2011-May 2020; median observation period, 77 months) whose baseline biopsy data were available. We compared the chronic-change group (n = 38) with the control group (n = 129) to assess the impact of self-reported daily water intake on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The range distribution of water intake was as follows: - 1000 ml (n = 4), 1000-1500 ml (n = 23), 1500-2000 ml (n = 64), 2000-2500 ml (n = 57), 2500-3000 ml (n = 16), and 3000 - ml (n = 3). Donor age was significantly higher in the chronic-change group. In the control group, the ΔeGFR/year increase was correlated with water intake. However, the increase in the water intake of the chronic-change group significantly decreased ΔeGFR/year (1000-1500 ml: + 1.95 ml/min/1.73 m2 and > 2000 ml: - 1.92 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.014). This study suggested a potential influence of increased water intake on recipients with marginal grafts in living donor kidney transplantation.

The Resistive Index by Doppler Ultrasonography as a Predictor of the Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Doppler ultrasonography (US) is a noninvasive examination for assessing graft function after kidney transplantation. Although Doppler US is routinely performed, only a few reports have investigated whether a high resistive index (RI) detected by Doppler US affects graft function and survival. We hypothesized that there is a relationship between a high RI and inferior outcomes after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We included 164 living kidney transplant patients treated between April 2011 and July 2019. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to RI (cut-off, 0.7) 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS: The recipient was significantly older in the high RI (≥0.7) group. Moreover, there were significant differences in the prevalence of pretransplant diabetes mellitus and the value of pretransplant hemoglobin A1c. Regarding long-term outcome, there was no significant difference in overall graft survival (5 years, 92.6% vs 91.8%; 10 years, 85.0% vs 67.9%; P = .64). On the other hand, the mortality was significantly worse in the high RI group (5 years, 99.1% vs 93.9%; 10 years, 96.4% vs 70.0%, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: A high RI might predict mortality after kidney transplantation.

Appointment Nonadherence and Graft Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is associated with worse graft outcomes but is hard to recognize in clinical settings due to its self-reporting nature. We hypothesized that appointment nonadherence might be associated with worse graft outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: We included 167 adult living-donor kidney transplants whose grafts survived >2 years from April 2011 to May 2020. Thirty-two cases of appointment nonadherence were identified and compared with the controls (n = 135). RESULTS: Younger age, male sex, higher body weight, and parent donor were significantly observed in the appointment nonadherence group. The appointment nonadherence group was significantly associated with worse graft survival (5 years: 82.3% vs 98.9%, P < .001, 10 years: 67.2% vs 89.6%, P < .001), de novo donor-specific antibody production, acute rejection, as well as the decline of graft function. Furthermore, appointment nonadherence had a 4-fold higher risk of graft loss after an adjustment with recipient age, sex, body weight, and donor type (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.15-13.42, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Appointment nonadherence might be an alternative predictor for worse graft outcomes after living donor kidney transplantation.

A Case of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection Caused by a Pre-Existing Anti-DQ Donor-Specific Antibody in a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Recipient Without History of Sensitization: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is reported to produce anti-HLA antibodies. We report a case of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection caused by pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a patient with SLE without a history of sensitization. CASE REPORT: The case was a 29-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis. Cross-match with the mother was negative, but low titer anti-DQ DSA was detected, although he had no prior history of sensitization. After desensitization with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil, a living donor kidney transplant was undergone, and his early postoperative period was uneventful. However, his renal function started to decline at 2 years post-transplant. Although there was no rejection on the biopsy at 2.5 years post-transplant, his renal function continued to decline after that. At 7 years, he had failed his graft due to chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. Retrospective analysis of human leukocyte antigen antibody tests revealed that anti-DQ DSA had disappeared at 1 year post-transplant, but high titer DSA was detected again with complement-binding capacity at 2 years and after that. CONCLUSION: Careful monitoring might be warranted in an SLE patient with pre-existing DSA, even though the titer was low and without any prior histories of sensitization events.

Influence of Graft Ureter Length, a Donor-Related Factor, on Urinary Tract Infections After Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis of 211 Cases.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) occurs in 25% of recipients of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Female sex, age, and anatomical abnormalities have been reported as recipient-related risk factors for UTI after LDKT; few studies have reported donor-related factors. We retrospectively examined UTI occurrence within 5 years of transplantation in recipients (n = 211) who underwent LDKT at our hospital between April 2011 and April 2021. All nephrectomies were performed using a retroperitoneal pure laparoscopic approach. The ureter was dissected at the lower level of the common iliac artery and trimmed to the shortest length, enough to reach the bladder using extra vesicular ureterocystoneostomy with a 3 cm submucosal tunnel. Twenty-nine recipients (13.7%) developed UTI within 5 years, and the median time to onset was 40.0 days. After adjusting for the well-known factors, including recipient sex, graft ureter length was an independent factor for UTI occurrence (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02∼1.53, p = 0.028) in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. The long ureter is usually trimmed, and the widest part is used for anastomosis, which may increase the possibility of reflux from the bladder to the ureter in the standard technique. The ureter length may be associated with the incidence of UTI after LDKT.

Acute kidney injury and the compensation of kidney function after nephrectomy in living donation.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence is growing rapidly, and AKI is one of the predictors of inpatient mortality. After nephrectomy, all the patients have decreased kidney function with AKI and recover from AKI. However, the characteristic and behavior of AKI is different from usual AKI and compensatory kidney function has been well known in the postoperative setting, especially in living donors. In this review, we have focused on the compensation of kidney function after nephrectomy in living donors. We discuss factors that have been identified as being associated with kidney recovery in donors including age, sex, body mass index, remnant kidney volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and various comorbidities.

Impact of COVID-19 on living donor liver and kidney transplantation programs in Japan in 2020.

BACKGROUND: Although many transplant programs have been forced to suspend living donor transplants due to the emergence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), there are relatively few real-time databases to assess center-level transplant activities. We aimed to delineate the actual impact of COVID-19 on living donor transplant programs and the resumption process in Japan. METHODS: In a nationwide survey, questionnaires were sent to 32 liver transplant programs that had performed at least more than one case of living donor liver transplantation in 2019 and 132 kidney transplant programs that had performed more than one living donor kidney transplantation in 2018. RESULTS: Thirty-one (96.9%) and 125 (94.7%) liver and kidney transplant programs responded, respectively. In the early pandemic period, 67.7% (21/31) of liver programs and 29.8% (37/125) of kidney programs were able to maintain transplant activities similar to those during the pre-pandemic period. After temporal suspension, 58.1% of kidney programs resumed their transplant activity after the number of local COVID-19 cases peaked. Establishing institutional COVID-19 screening, triage, and therapeutic management protocols was mandatory to resume transplant activity for 64.5% and 67.7% of liver and kidney programs, respectively. In the future wave of COVID-19, 67.7% of liver programs would be affected by institutional COVID-19 intensive care unit-bound patient numbers, and 55.7% of kidney programs would stop if hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreads. CONCLUSIONS: THIS NATIONWIDE SURVEY REVEALED FOR THE FIRST TIME HOW LIVING DONOR LIVER AND KIDNEY: transplant programs changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in a country where living donor transplantations are predominant.

Two-year outcomes of low-exposure extended-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen in de novo kidney transplantation: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (TACER) is commonly administered following kidney transplantation (KTx); however, its optimal dosage remains unknown. METHODS: In this multi-center, randomized controlled trial, 62 living donor KTx recipients were assigned to either standard-exposure (SE; n = 32) or low-exposure (LE; n = 30) TACER (Graceptor®, Astellas Pharm Inc.) groups. All patients received basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The primary outcomes were acute rejection, graft/patient survival, and the secondary outcomes were incidence of cytomegalovirus infection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) production. RESULTS: The tacrolimus trough level and estimated area under the blood concentration-time curve (eAUC) were significantly higher in SE than in LE (SE vs. LE; 1 year: 5.0 ± 0.9 ng/ml and 206.9 ± 26.8 ng h/ml vs. 3.4 ± 1.0 ng/ml and 153.9 ± 26.4 ng h/ml; 2 years: 4.8 ± 1.0 ng/ml and 204.9 ± 30.1 ng h/ml vs. 3.8 ± 0.9 ng/ml and 164.4 ± 27.0 ng h/ml). In contrast, the dosage and eAUC of MMF did not differ between groups. Two-year graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups, and acute rejection rates were 0% and 10% in the SE and LE, respectively (p = 0.11). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rates did not differ between the groups. Cytomegalovirus infection was slightly lower in the LE (SE: 12.5% and LE: 6.7%, p = 0.37). In the LE, four cases of dnDSA were noted within 2 years of transplantation; no case was observed in the SE (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Although the LE TACER regimen showed similar rates of acute rejection, as well as graft and patient survival compared with SE after KTx, LE was significantly more associated with dnDSA. Further investigation of its long-term effect on graft survival is warranted. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ID: UMIN000033089).

Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir and Renal Dysfunction in Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a novel anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug, and it is currently the only drug available for patients with severe renal impairment. Here we report a case with renal dysfunction after an administration of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. CASE REPORT: The case was 66-year-old Japanese man who turned out to be HCV-positive 14 years ago at the time of his second deceased renal transplantation. He had no prior history of HCV treatment. HCV genotype was serogroup 1, and baseline HCV-RNA was 5.3 LOG IU/mL. Since glecaprevir/pibrentasvir became available, he started to take it for treatment of HCV. His immunosuppressants were tacrolimus (trough levels 4.3∼6.5 ng/mL) and 5 mg of prednisolone. His baseline renal function was serum creatinine (Cr) 2.1 mg/dL and urine protein (-). Shortly after starting glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the serum Cr started to increase. Serum Cr reached up to 2.92 mg/dL and urine protein was (+) at day 36. Right pleural effusion was observed while cardiac function was normal. His liver function had been consistently normal. We concluded glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was the cause of renal dysfunction as no other drugs were added. Immediately after discontinuation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir at day 36, serum Cr decreased to 1.9 mg/dL and urine protein turned negative at day 64. Although the patient completed a half course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, HCV-RNA turned to be negative at day 36. CONCLUSIONS: We experienced a case with renal dysfunction after the initiation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in deceased donor renal transplant recipient. Renal dysfunction caused by glecaprevir/pibrentasvir has not been reported so far.

Long-term impact of baseline serum uric acid levels on living kidney donors: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative characteristics of living kidney donors are commonly considered during donor selection and postoperative follow-up. However, the impact of preoperative uric acid (UA) levels is poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative serum UA levels and post-donation long-term events and renal function. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 183 living kidney donors. The donors were divided into high (≥5.5 mg/dl) and low (< 5.5 mg/dl) UA groups. We analyzed the relationship between preoperative UA levels and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as adverse events (cardiovascular events and additional prescriptions for hypertension, gout, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus), over 5 years after donation. RESULTS: In total, 44 donors experienced 52 adverse events over 5 years. The incidence of adverse events within 5 years was significantly higher in the high UA group than in the low UA group (50% vs. 24%, p = 0.003); this was true even after the exclusion of hyperuricemia-related events (p = 0.047). UA emerged as an independent risk factor for adverse events (p = 0.012). Donors with higher UA levels had lower eGFRs after donation, whereas body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol did not have any impact on the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that preoperative UA levels should be considered during donor selection and postoperative follow-up.

HbA1c and Aortic Calcification Index as Noninvasive Predictors of Pre-Existing Histopathological Damages in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

We previously reported that allografts from living donors may have pre-existing histopathological damages, defined as the combination of interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and arteriolar hyalinosis (ah) scores of ≧1, according to the Banff classification. We examined preoperative characteristics to identify whether the degree of these damages was related to metabolic syndrome-related factors of donors. We conducted a single-center cross-sectional analysis including 183 living kidney donors. Donors were divided into two groups: chronic change (ci + ct ≧ 1 ∩ ah ≧ 1, n = 27) and control (n = 156). Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), aortic calcification index (ACI), and psoas muscle index (PMI), were analyzed. Comparing the groups, the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different; however, we observed a significant difference for ACI (p = 0.009). HbA1c (p = 0.016) and ACI (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors to predict pre-existing histopathological damages, whereas PMI was not. HbA1c correlated with ct scores (p = 0.035), and ACI correlated with ci (p = 0.005), ct (p = 0.021), and ah (p = 0.017). HbA1c and ACI may serve as preoperative markers for identifying pre-existing damages on the kidneys of living donors.

Optimizing Intraoperative Blood Pressure to Improve Outcomes in Living Donor Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate renal perfusion at the time of unclamping is important because it has been known to affect outcomes in renal transplantation. Nevertheless, the ideal intraoperative systolic arterial pressure (SAP) has not been well defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 106 living donor renal transplants performed at our center from June 2010 to May 2019. We divided the cohort into 2 groups according to our center's goal SAP of ≥150 mm Hg: 57 patients had SAP ≥150 mm Hg and 49 patients had SAP <150 mm Hg. We analyzed pretransplant characteristics, intraoperative measurements, and postoperative laboratory values to validate our center's target SAP at the time of reperfusion. This study strictly complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration regarding donor sources. RESULTS: Patients with SAP ≥150 mm Hg had been on dialysis for a significantly shorter duration before transplant compared with those who had SAP <150 mm Hg. In the SAP ≥150 mm Hg group, urinary sodium excretion normalized earlier, and they had a significantly smaller stroke volume variation, higher cardiac output and cardiac index, earlier initial urination, and higher intraoperative urine output. There were no differences in intraoperative volume repletion, central venous pressure, or postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSION: Achieving SAP ≥150 mm Hg at the time of reperfusion may be associated with early stabilization of graft function. Nevertheless, our data suggested that recipients with a prolonged dialysis history are less likely to achieve SAP ≥150 mm Hg at the time of unclamping in living donor renal transplantation.

Is the Living Donor Kidney Profile Index Valuable in Japanese Patients?

INTRODUCTION: The Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) was recently proposed in the United States to evaluate living donor quality. Japan has a largely different renal transplant circumstance, such as a high ABO incompatibility rate. The aim of this study was to validate the LKDPI among the Japanese population and adjust the score. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 133 living donors in renal transplant in our institution. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes, and created a modified LKDPI score considering the favorable ABO incompatible kidney transplant outcomes in Japan. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) donor age was 59 (51 to 65) and median (IQR) body mass index was 22.9 kg/m2 (20.9 to 25.2). ABO incompatibility rate was 28.5%. Median (IQR) donor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) was 108.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (99.9 to 115.5). The 1-year graft survival rate was 98.5%, and the 3-year graft survival rate was 97%. The incidence of antibody mediated rejection was 5.2%. The median (IQR) LKDPI score was 30.2 (11.8 to 46.8). This was significantly higher than the previously reported score in the United States, which was 12.8 (-0.8 to 27.2). The modified LKDPI (mLKDPI) score was 23.2 (4.1 to 35.1). LKDPI and mLKDPI did not show a diagnostic value in graft survival; however, LKDPI and mLKDPI showed significant diagnostic value in eGFR at 1 year (area under the curve [AUC]=0.627, P = .017; and AUC=0.673, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our outcomes had better survival even though with higher ABO incompatibility rate. According to original LKDPI, our donor pool is higher than the general US population. In this study, lower LKDPI tended to be associated with good allograft function, and mLKDPI has better diagnostic value than LKDPI. To compare internationally, an adjusted model for Japan might be necessary based on the outcomes of a large population.

Impact of Very Low-Dose Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole on Serum Creatinine after Renal Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that high-dose trimethoprim, through its effect of inhibiting creatinine secretion, increases serum creatinine levels without changes in real glomerular filtration rate. However, there has been no report regarding the effect of very low-dose trimethoprim on serum creatinine levels after renal transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 76 renal transplantation recipient outpatients who completed their course of initial prophylaxis at our institution. Twelve patients who experienced events that might affect their serum creatinine levels were excluded. Fifty-one patients who required readministration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent a possible outbreak of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and 13 patients who did not receive readministration (control) were analyzed. Dosage was 80 mg/400 mg (per tablet), administered as 3 tablets per week for 30.6 ± 13.5 days. This study strictly complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul. Declaration regarding donor source. RESULTS: All patients completed readministration without adverse events. Serum creatinine increased significantly in the readministration group (1.40 ± 0.64 mg/dL to 1.48 ± 0.70 mg/dL, P < .01) while not in the control group. The higher the initial serum creatinine level, the greater the increase of Δ serum creatinine (R = 0.59, P < .001). Sex, baseline urine protein level, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use, donor type, and time after renal transplantation did not affect Δ serum creatinine. Serum creatinine returned to baseline levels after cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Very low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis significantly raised serum creatinine reversibly by 6% after renal transplantation.

Inferior Long-Term Graft Survival of Suboptimal Kidneys After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In living donors, if both kidneys are considered to be of equal quality, the side with favorable anatomy for transplant is usually selected. A "suboptimal kidney" is a kidney that has a significant abnormality and is chosen to maintain the principle of leaving the better kidney with the donor. We hypothesized that the long-term outcome of suboptimal kidney is inferior to that of the normal kidney. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of 1744 living donor kidney transplantations performed between 1999 and 2015 at our institution, 172 allografts were considered as a suboptimal kidney (9.9%). Median length of follow-up after living donor kidney transplantation was 59.5 months (interquartile range 26.3-100.8). This study strictly complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration regarding donor source. RESULTS: The reasons for suboptimal kidneys were cysts or tumors (46.5%), arterial abnormalities (22.7%), inferior size or function (19.8%), and anatomic abnormalities (11.0%). Suboptimal kidneys showed worse long-term overall graft survival regardless of the reasons (5-year: control vs suboptimal kidney; 88.9% vs 79.3%, P = .001 and 10-year: 73.6% vs 63.5%, P = .004). Suboptimal kidneys showed a 1.6-fold higher adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of all-cause graft loss (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.5, P = .025) and had the same impact as older donor age (≥ 54 years old, aHR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of suboptimal kidney should be factored into the donor selection process.

Factors related to suboptimal recovery of renal function after living donor nephrectomy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The renal function of the remaining kidney in living donors recovers up to 60~70% of pre-donation estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by compensatory hypertrophy. However, the degree of this hypertrophy varies from donor to donor and the factors related to it are scarcely known. METHODS: We analyzed 103 living renal transplantations in our institution and divided them into two groups: compensatory hypertrophy group [optimal group, 1-year eGFR ≥60% of pre-donation, n = 63] and suboptimal compensatory hypertrophy group (suboptimal group, 1-year eGFR < 60% of pre-donation, n = 40). We retrospectively analyzed the factors related to suboptimal compensatory hypertrophy. RESULTS: Baseline eGFRs were the same in the two groups (optimal versus suboptimal: 82.0 ± 13.1 ml/min/1.73m2 versus 83.5 ± 14.8 ml/min/1.73m2, p = 0.588). Donor age (optimal versus suboptimal: 56.0 ± 10.4 years old versus 60.7 ± 8.7 years old, p = 0.018) and uric acid (optimal versus suboptimal: 4.8 ± 1.2 mg/dl versus 5.5 ± 1.3 mg/dl, p = 0.007) were significantly higher in the suboptimal group. The rate of pathological chronicity finding on 1-h biopsy (ah≧1 ∩ ct + ci≧1) was much higher in the suboptimal group (optimal versus suboptimal: 6.4% versus 25.0%, p = 0.007). After the multivariate analysis, the pathological chronicity finding [odds ratio (OR): 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-17.8, p = 0.021] and uric acid (per 1.0 mg/dl, OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2, p = 0.022) were found to be independent risk factors for suboptimal compensatory hypertrophy. CONCLUSION: Chronicity findings on baseline biopsy and higher uric acid were associated with insufficient recovery of the post-donated renal function.

Prediction model of compensation for contralateral kidney after living-donor donation.

BACKGROUND: Compensation of contralateral kidney function after living-donor kidney donation is well known, and many predictive factors have been proposed. However, no prediction model has been proposed. This study was performed to establish a tool with which to estimate the degree of compensation of the contralateral kidney after living-donor kidney donation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 133 living donors for renal transplantation in our institution. We defined a favorable compensation as a post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year (calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) of > 60% of the pre-donation eGFR. We analyzed the living donors' clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: The median (range) donor age was 59 (24-79) years, median (range) body mass index was 22.9 (16.8-32.7) kg/m2, and median (range) body surface area was 1.6 (1.3-2.0) m2. All donors were Japanese, and 73% of the donors were biologically related. The median (range) donor pre-donation eGFR was 108.7 (82-144) ml/min/1.73 m2, and the median (range) post-donation eGFR at 1 year was 86.9 (43-143) ml/min/1.73 m2. Eighty-six percent of donors had compensatory hypertrophy. In the univariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, body surface area, and pre-donation eGFR were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, and ratio of the remnant kidney volume to body weight were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). Based on these results, we created a compensation prediction score (CPS). The median (range) CPS was 8.7 (1.1-17.4). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed strong diagnostic accuracy for predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve, 0.958; 95% confidence interval, 0.925-0.991, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of the CPS was 5.0 (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 89.5%). The CPS had a strong positive correlation with the post-donation eGFR (R = 0.797, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CPS might be useful tool with which to predict a favorable compensation of the contralateral kidney and remnant kidney function. If the CPS is low, careful management and follow-up might be necessary. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings in larger populations.

Chronic Renal Failure as a Possible Risk Factor for Allergic Reaction in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Using Fresh Frozen Plasma.

The incidence of allergic reactions in patients with chronic renal failure during plasma exchange using fresh frozen plasma is not well known. We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent plasma exchange between January 2013 and May 2018. The most common indication for plasma exchange was desensitization/preconditioning for kidney transplant (61.3%, 38/62). The incidence of allergic reactions was significantly higher in patients with chronic renal failure than patients without (57.1% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.029). Also, the incidence of allergic reactions tended to be higher in peritoneal dialysis patients (75%, 3/4) than in hemodialysis (58.8%, 10/17) and preemptive kidney transplant (58%, 11/19). These results suggested the relationship of chronic renal failure and the incidence of allergic reactions in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange using fresh frozen plasma.

Inferior long-term graft survival after end-to-side reconstruction for two renal arteries in living donor renal transplantation.

Living donor kidneys with two arteries can be revascularized using various techniques depending on anatomy. We hypothesized that the revascularization technique could impact long-term outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 1714 living donor renal transplants at our institution between 1999 and 2015. Three hundred and eleven kidneys had dual arteries, and these were categorized into 5 groups; end-to-side (n = 18), inferior epigastric artery (n = 21), direct anastomosis (n = 65), side-to-side (n = 126) and ligated (n = 81). We then compared the outcomes with that of a control group (single artery, n = 1403) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Cox regression was adjusted by age, sex and race/ethnicity of donor and recipient, side of kidney, transplant period and recipient surgeon. Compared to the control group, the end-to-side group had increased all-cause graft loss (10 years: 77.2% vs 24.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-7.03, p = 0.010) and death-censored graft loss (10 years: 82.0% vs 55.9%, aHR 4.17, 95% CI 1.63-10.68, p = 0.003), whereas the other groups did not. Our study shows that 10-year overall survival and death-censored graft survival were significantly worse for end-to-side arterial reconstruction than for other techniques. Alternative techniques to the end-to-side method should be used for accessory arteries that require revascularization.