Different incidences of diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment since diagnosis according to the course of diabetes diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.

We aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy since clinical diagnosis of diabetes based on the course of diagnosis in a retrospective cohort study using Japan's medical claims and health checkup data (JMDC Claims Database; 2009-2020). We included patients whose diabetes was first diagnosed at medical facilities (hospitals/clinics). We grouped them by health checkup participation before diagnosis, health checkup results, and antidiabetic medication promptly after the diagnosis. The incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (laser photocoagulation, intraocular injection, or vitrectomy) was compared among the groups. Of 126,696 patients, those who started an antidiabetic medication promptly after diabetes diagnosis without a recent health checkup faced the highest risk of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (1-/5-year cumulative incidence: 3.1%/6.0%). This increased risk was consistently observed across various analyses, including the Cox proportional hazard model, sensitivity analysis restricting to those with an eye examination, and sensitivity analysis using vitrectomy as the outcome. Among patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% at recent health checkups, those who promptly started an antidiabetic medication had a higher risk (1.4%/3.8%) than those who did not (0.7%/2.7%). Taking the information about the course of diabetes diagnosis is important to manage risk stratification for diabetic retinopathy appropriately.

Out-of-pocket payment and patients' treatment choice for assisted reproductive technology by household income: a conjoint analysis using an online social research panel in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Economic disparities affect access to assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment in many countries. At the time of this survey, Japan provided partial reimbursement for ART treatment only for those in low- or middle-income classes due to limited governmental budgets. However, the optimal level of financial support by income class remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a conjoint analysis of ART in Japan in January 2020. We recruited 824 women with fertility problems aged 25 to 44 years via an online social research panel. They completed a questionnaire of 16 hypothetical scenarios measuring six relevant ART attributes (i.e., out-of-pocket payment, pregnancy rate, risk of adverse effects, number of visits to outpatient clinics, consultation hours and kindness of staff) and their relations to treatment choice. RESULTS: Mixed-effect logistic regression models showed that all six attributes significantly influenced treatment preferences, with participants valuing out-of-pocket payment the most, followed by pregnancy rates and kindness of staff. Significant interactions occurred between high household income (≥ 8 million JPY) and high out-of-pocket payment (≥ 500,000 JPY). However, the average marginal probability of the highest-income patients (i.e., ≥ 10 million JPY, ineligible for the subsidy) receiving ART treatment at the average cost of 400,000 JPY was 47%, compared to 56 - 61% of other income participants, who opted to receive ART at an average cost of 100,000 JPY after a 300,000 JPY subsidy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that out-of-pocket payment is the primary determinant in patients' decision to opt for ART treatment. High-income patients were more likely to choose treatment, even at a high cost, but their income-based ineligibility for government financial support might discourage some from receiving treatment.

Incidence of interventions for diabetic retinopathy and serious lower-limb complications and its related factors in patients with type 2 diabetes using a real-world large claims database.

Aims: To examine the incidence of interventions for diabetic retinopathy and serious limb complications and to elucidate the patient attributes related to the incidence of each intervention based on real-world claims data from Japan. Materials and methods: A retrospective longitudinal study design involving a 9 year (2009-2018) claims database obtained from the JMDC Inc. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 20-74 years taking antidiabetic medications were divided into two groups: "patients with newly initiated antidiabetic medication" (Group 1, n = 47,201) and "patients with continuing antidiabetic medication" (Group 2, n = 82,332). The incidence rate for each intervention was analyzed. We also divided Group 1 into the former and latter periods and investigated temporal changes. Results: The incidences of the first retinopathy intervention (laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or intraocular injection), vitrectomy, and lower-limb amputations in Group 1 were 7.46, 2.37, and 0.31 /1000 person-years, respectively. Those in Group 2 were about 1.2-1.5 times higher. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents rather than insured persons were associated with a higher incidence in both groups after adjustment. While the incidence of the interventions for retinopathy hardly changed during the observation period, that of lower-limb amputations decreased by 40%, with less statistical significance (p = 0.11). Conclusions: We showed the incidences of the first retinopathy interventions and lower-limb amputations and their secular trends in patients with diabetes, stratified by whether the antidiabetic medication was newly initiated or not. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents were risk factors of these interventions for diabetic complications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-021-00566-7.

Factors associated with the degree of glycemic deterioration among patients with type 2 diabetes who dropped out of diabetes care: A longitudinal analysis using medical claims and health checkup data in Japan.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To identify factors associated with worsening glycemic control after discontinuing diabetes care among patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study combined medical claims and health checkup data between January 2005 and April 2018. Adult Japanese workers with type 2 diabetes who had dropped out from diabetes care for ≥4 months after receiving ≥18 months of non-intermittent care and had health checkup information both before and after the dropout were included. Factors associated with changes in HbA1c during the dropout period were identified using multiple linear regression analyses and depicting restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. RESULTS: A total of 1,125 patients (mean age: 51.2 years, baseline HbA1c: 6.8%, and number of males: 93.7%) whose follow-up HbA1c increased to 7.6% after a mean 9.3-month dropout period were included. Deterioration in HbA1c was associated with higher baseline HbA1c and sulfonylurea or insulin use. The RCS curves illustrated that patients without antidiabetic medication had small changes in HbA1c (+0.5% from a baseline HbA1c of 7.0%), whereas those using sulfonylureas or insulin had an approximately 2% or more increase in HbA1c even when maintaining reasonable glycemic control before dropping out. CONCLUSIONS: Overall in this study, glycemic control worsened during treatment interruptions among patients who were mainly male employees. However, changes in HbA1c greatly varied based on baseline HbA1c and antidiabetic medication type. Caring for patients at risk of worsening glycemic control due to treatment dropout, especially those using sulfonylurea and insulin, is imperative.

Household income and medical help-seeking for fertility problems among a representative population in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Fertility treatments help many infertile couples to have children. However, disparities exist in access to fertility tests and treatments. We investigated the association between household income and medical help-seeking for fertility in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the National Fertility Survey 2015. Respondents were 6598 married women younger than 50 years old. The primary outcome was medical help-seeking for fertility among those who experienced fertility problems. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the association between household income and medical help-seeking, adjusting for age, length of marriage, educational level, employment status, number of children, childbearing desires, living with parents, and region of residence. RESULTS: Among 2253 (34%) women who experienced fertility problems, 1154 (51%) sought medical help. The proportion of help-seekers increased linearly from 43% in the low-income group (< 4 million Japanese yen [JPY]) to 59% in the high-income group (≥ 8 million JPY) (P for trend < 0.001). Respondents with upper-middle (6-8 million JPY) or high household income were more likely to seek medical help, compared to those with low household income: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.86) and aOR 1.78 (95% CI: 1.29-2.47), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher household income was associated with a higher probability of seeking medical help among Japanese women who experienced fertility problem. Along with policy discussion about additional financial support, further studies from societal, cultural, or psychological views are required.

Fertility treatments have helped millions of people to have a child. Although financial factors are known to play an important role in the decision to use fertility treatments, no previous studies have investigated how socioeconomic factors affect medical help-seeking for fertility in Japan. Therefore, we assessed the association between household income and medical help-seeking among couples with fertility problems in Japan, using nationally representative data from the National Fertility Survey 2015. Of the 6598 respondents (married women under 50 years old), one-third (2253) reported worrying about fertility problems, and half of those women (1154) sought medical help for fertility-related issues. The proportion of help-seekers was highest (59%) among those with high household income and lowest (43%) among those with low household income with a significant linear trend. Even after accounting for age, length of marriage, educational level, employment status, and other possibly related factors, those with higher household income were more likely to seek medical help for fertility tests and treatments. Japan provides various sources of financial support for fertility-related care, such as health insurance coverage for tests and early-stage treatments and partial subsidies for assisted reproductive technology treatments. However, the results indicate that further policy discussion about additional financial support and further studies focusing on barriers to care in Japan could help improve the situations for those with fertility problems.

Variation in process quality measures of diabetes care by region and institution in Japan during 2015-2016: An observational study of nationwide claims data.

AIMS: To calculate process quality measures of diabetes care in Japan using nationwide exclusive claims database. METHODS: Using the National Database of health insurance claims during 2015-2016, the proportions of outpatients who received recommended examinations at least annually among those with regular antidiabetic medication were calculated as quality indicators, reported altogether and by prefecture and institutional certification (from the Japan Diabetes Society). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators were also reported. RESULTS: Among 4,154,452 outpatients, 96.7% underwent HbA1c or glycated albumin examination. Retinopathy examination was conducted among 46.5% of patients [prefecture (range): 37.5%-51.0%, institutional certification: 44.8% (without) vs. 59.8% (with)]. Urinary qualitative examination was conducted among 67.3% of patients at institutions with <200 beds (prefecture: 54.1%-81.9%, institutional certification: 66.8% vs. 92.8%), whereas urinary quantitative albumin or protein examination was conducted among 19.4% of patients (prefecture: 10.8%-31.6%, institutional certification: 18.7% vs. 54.8%). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators showed that most institutions without institutional certification seldomly order urinary quantitative examination. CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality indicator for glycaemic control examination was favourable, some aspects of diabetes care were suboptimal and varied greatly by prefecture and institution; individual and organisational efforts to improve quality of diabetes care would be needed in Japan.