Nurses' perceived barriers and educational needs for early mobilisation of critical ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) of critically ill patients is an evidence-based intervention designed to improve treatment outcomes and enhance the quality of life after intensive care. However, several barriers exist to its establishment in clinical practice. Thus, the objective of the present study was to identify barriers perceived by critical care nurses, corresponding educational needs, and provide useful information for program implementation in Korea. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2017 using a structured, self-administered questionnaire that was completed by 151 critical care nurses from three tertiary hospitals and four secondary hospitals located in Seoul. The survey was designed to rate experiences with EM, identify educational experiences, and measure perceived barriers regarding attitudes, knowledge, behaviours, and educational needs. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and analyses of variance. RESULTS: The mean number of perceived barriers was 3.13 ± 0.38 out of 5 on a Likert scale. Attitude-related barriers (3.25 ± 0.49) were higher than behaviour-related (3.21 ± 0.44) and knowledge-related (2.94 ± 0.59) barriers. The top five barrier items were high workload, patients' inability to exercise, lack of time, inappropriate nurse/patient ratio, and absence of relevant education. Educational needs for early mobilisation were rated 3.74 ± 0.78 out of 5. Educational items were prioritised as identifying potential problems in EM and possible solutions, related protocols and guidelines, and procedures for special conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that critical care nurses in Korea perceive various barriers to successfully implementing evidence-based EM interventions for critically ill patients, as well as the educational needs necessary to overcome such challenges. Accordingly, an educational program should be developed based on the educational needs revealed in the present study. In parallel, organisational efforts should also be made to meet environmental conditions.

Frequency of concomitant ischemic heart disease and risk factor analysis for an early postoperative myocardial infarction after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: We aimed to see the frequency of concomitant ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Korean patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and to determine risk factors for an early postoperative acute myocardial infarction (PAMI) after elective open or endovascular AAA repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a database of patients who underwent elective AAA repair over the past 11 years. Patients were classified into 3 groups: control group; group I, medical IHD treatment; group II, invasive IHD treatment. Rates of PAMI and mortality at 30 days were compiled and compared between groups according to the type of AAA repair. RESULTS: Six hundred two elective repairs of infrarenal or juxtarenal AAAs were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into control group (n = 398, 66.1%), group I (n = 73, 12.1%) and group II (n = 131, 21.8%). PAMI developed more frequently after open surgical repair (OSR) than after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) (5.4% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.012). In OSR patients (n = 373), PAMI developed 2.1% in control group, 18.0% in group I and 7.1% in group II (P < 0.001). In EVAR group (n = 229), PAMI developed 0.6% in control group, 4.3% in group I and 2.2% in group II (P = 0.211). On the multivariable analysis of risk factors of PAMI, PAMI developed more frequently in patients with positive functional stress test. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of concomitant IHD was 34% in Korean AAA patients. The risk of PAMI was significantly higher after OSR compared to EVAR and in patients with IHD compared to control group. Though we found some risk factors for PAMI, these were not applied to postoperative mortality rate.

Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: The risk factors for acquiring an infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery are poorly understood. We evaluated the risk factors associated with the initial acquisition of MDR pathogens in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at a university affiliated-tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. From January 2009 to April 2013, a total of 6767 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery were registered. Of these patients, 190 (2.8%) were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage. Finally, 143 (2.1%) patients with culture test results were included in this study. RESULTS: Of the 143 enrolled patients, 46 (32.2%) were classified in the MDR group. The use of antibiotics for more than 5 days before diagnosis of anastomosis site leakage (p = 0.016) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.028) was identified as independent risk factors for MDR acquisition by multivariate analysis. The rate of adequate initial empirical antibiotic therapy in the MDR group was lower than in the non-MDR group (35 vs. 75%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the duration of antibiotic administration after the leak was longer in the MDR group (p = 0.013). Patients in the MDR group also had a longer hospital stay (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The length of antibiotic administration before the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and diabetes mellitus were risk factors associated with the acquisition of MDR bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.