Risk Factors for Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients Who Underwent Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

Background: Candida species account for approximately 15% of hospital-associated infections, causing fatal consequences, especially in critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate invasive candidiasis (IC) risk factors in critically ill patients undergoing surgery. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 583 patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated intra-abdominal infections between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of IC during their hospital stay. IC was defined as culture-proven candidemia and intra-abdominal candidiasis. Results: This study included 373 patients for the final analysis, of whom 320 were discharged without IC (IC absent group) and 53 presented with IC (IC present group) during their hospital stay. The IC present group showed a higher in-hospital mortality rate (35.8 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001), with 66.0% of the patients diagnosed within 10 days, whereas only 6.5% were diagnosed beyond 20 days after admission. Stomach (odds ratio [OR], 4.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.204-14.561; p = 0.024) and duodenum (OR, 7.595; 95% CI, 1.934-29.832; p = 0.004) as infection origin, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (OR, 1.097; 95% CI, 1.044-1.152; p < 0.001), and lower initial systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.983; 95% CI, 0.968-0.997; p = 0.018) were risk factors of IC after emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Conclusions: Patients who had stomach and duodenum as infection origin, higher APACHE II scores, and lower initial systolic blood pressure had a higher risk of developing IC during their hospital stay after emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Prophylactic antifungal agents can be carefully considered for critically ill patients with these features.

Cnidium officinale polysaccharide enhanced RAW 264.7 cells activation and NK-92 cells cytotoxicity against colon cancer via NF-κB and MAPKs signaling pathways.

In this study, Cnidium officinale-derived polysaccharides were isolated and investigated for their immune enhancing and anticancer activities. The isolated crude and its fractions, such as F1 and F2, contain carbohydrates (51.3-63.1%), sulfates (5.4-5.8%), proteins (1.5-7.1%), and uronic acids (2.1-26.9%). The molecular weight (Mw) of the polysaccharides ranged from 59.9 to 429.0 × 103 g/mol. The immunostimulatory activity of the polysaccharides was tested on RAW 264.7 cells, and the results showed that the F2 treatment notably enhanced pro-inflammatory activity in RAW 264.7 cells by increasing NO production and the expression of various cytokines. Furthermore, the influence of polysaccharide treatment on natural killer cells (NK-92) anticancer activities was investigated using a colon cancer cell line (HCT-116). Crude polysaccharide and its fractions showed no direct cytotoxicity to NK-92 and HCT-116 cells. However, the treatment of F2 showed an enhancement of NK-92 cells cytotoxicity against HCT-116 cells by upregulating the mRNA expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, NKGp44, and granzyme-B. The western blot results showed that the induced RAW 264.7 cells activation and NK-92 cells cytotoxicity occur via NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Overall, C. officinale-derived polysaccharides show potential as immunotherapeutic agents capable of enhancing pro-inflammatory macrophage signaling and activating NK-92 cells; thus, they could be useful for biomedical applications.

Oncologic outcome of colon cancer with perforation and obstruction.

PURPOSE: Perforation and obstruction in colorectal cancer are poor prognostic factors. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with colon cancer presenting with perforation or obstruction. METHODS: A total of 260 patients underwent surgery for colon cancer between January 2015 and December 2017. Among them, 54 patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated (n = 32) or obstructive (n = 22) colon cancer were included. RESULTS: The perforation (PG, n = 32) and obstruction groups (OG, n = 22) did not differ significantly in age (p = 0.486), sex (p = 0.821), tumor stage (p = 0.221), tumor location (p = 0.895), histologic grade (p = 0.173), or 3-year overall survival rate (55.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.784). However, the PG had a higher postoperative complication rate (44% vs. 17%, p = 0.025), longer intensive care unit stay (4.8 days vs. 0.8 days, p = 0.047), and lower 3-year recurrence-free survival (42.4% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.025) than the OG. In the multivariate analysis, perforation was significantly increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 3.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.049-12.839, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Patients with colon cancer initially presenting with perforation had poorer recurrence-free survival, higher postoperative complication rates, and longer ICU stays than those who had obstruction.

Treatment of a Total Obstructive Anastomosis Stricture Using a Transanal Laparoscopic Approach and Intraoperative Colonoscopic Balloon Dilatation.

An anastomosis stricture with a total obstruction is rare and treatment options are variable. We describe our experience with a combination of a single port transanal laparoscopic approach and intraoperative colonoscopic balloon dilatation. The patient was a 48-year-old man with rectal cancer. A laparoscopic single port lower anterior resection and diverting ileostomy were performed followed by a colon study and ileostomy takedown. The colon study and sigmoidoscopy revealed total obstruction of the rectum at the anastomosis level. We employed a transanal approach using a single port to correct this. We located the anastomosis stricture site and generated a lumen using a dissector and electocautery method to insert the balloon device. Colonoscopic balloon dilatation was subsequently successful. The patient was discharged with no postoperative complications. A laparoscopic single port transanal approach with an intraoperative colonoscopic balloon dilatation is a viable alternative approach to treating an anastomosis stricture of the rectum.

Benefits of repeated resections for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes after repeat metastasectomies in patients having undergone previous resections for colorectal cancer metastases. METHODS: We examined 248 patients who underwent metastasectomies for lung and/or liver metastases at our center during a 7-year period, from January 2005 to December 2011. Recurrence-free survival 1 (RFS1) after the metastasectomy for the initial recurrence, recurrence-free survival 2 (RFS2) after the second, and recurrence-free survival 3 (RFS3) after the third repeated resections for recurrence were assessed. The overall survival (OS) rate after the first metastasectomy for the first recurrence (OS) was also assessed. RESULTS: Sites of recurrence of the first metastasectomy were the liver, lung, and liver and lung in 115, 117, and 16 cases, respectively, and 133 patients had a second recurrence (133/248, 53.6%). Twenty-seven patients had a third recurrence (27/52, 51.9%), of whom 14 underwent a third metastasectomy. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 74.8% and 57.9%, respectively. The 1-year RFS1, RFS2, and RFS3 rates were 76%, 75%, and 39%, respectively. The hazard ratios for RFS were 1.142 and 2.590 for the first and second repeat surgeries, when compared to the first metastasectomy. The third metastasectomy showed significantly lower RFS than did the second metastasectomy. CONCLUSION: A second metastasectomy should be considered the optimal treatment for a second recurrence. However, careful considerations should be made before performing a third metastasectomy.

Feasibility of Single-Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.

Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a recently developed minimally invasive surgical technique. We aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic low anterior resection (S+1-LAR) with those of multi-port laparoscopic low anterior resection (M-LAR) for mid-to-low rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient characteristics and surgical outcomes by assessing data collected from the medical records of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid-to-low rectal cancer at the Gangneung Asan Hospital. Results: From April 2015 to April 2019, 52 patients underwent S+1-LAR (n=28) or M-LAR (n=24) for mid-to-low rectal cancer at Gangneung Asan Hospital. There were no significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics. The mean postoperative 1-day pain score was significantly lower in the S+1-LAR group. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: S+1-LAR is a feasible and safe technique and is comparable with M-LAR in terms of surgical outcomes of patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer.

Does the Different Locations of Colon Cancer Affect the Oncologic Outcome? A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the prognostic value of primary tumor location for oncologic outcomes in patients with colon cancer (CC). METHODS: CC patients treated with curative surgery between 2009 and 2012 were classified into 2 groups: right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined based on tumor stage. Propensity scores were created using eight variables (age, sex, T stage, N stage, histologic grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion/perineural invasion, and microsatellite instability status). RESULTS: Overall, 2,329 patients were identified. The 5-year RFSs for RCC and LCC patients were 89.7% and 88.4% (P = 0.328), respectively, and their 5-year OSs were 90.9% and 93.4% (P = 0.062). Multivariate survival analyses were carried out by using the Cox regression proportional hazard model. In the unadjusted analysis, a marginal increase in overall mortality was seen in RCC patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.297; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.987-1.704, P = 0.062); however, after multivariable adjustment, similar OSs were observed in those patients (HR, 1.219; 95% CI, 0.91-1.633; P = 0.183). After propensity-score matching with a total of 1,560 patients, no significant difference was identified (P = 0.183). A slightly worse OS was seen for stage III RCC patients (HR, 1.561; 95% CI, 0.967-2.522; P = 0.068) than for stage III LCC patients. The 5-year OSs for patients with stage III RCC and stage III LCC were 85.5% and 90.5%, respectively (P = 0.133). CONCLUSION: Although the results are inconclusive, tumor location tended to be associated with OS in CC patients with lymph node metastasis, but it was not related to oncologic outcome.

Primary malignant melanoma of the small intestine: a report of 2 cases and a review of the literature.

The majority of malignant melanomas in the small intestine are metastases from primary cutaneous lesions, it can also develop as a primary mucosal tumor in the gastrointestinal tract. In this report, we present rare cases of primary small bowel melanoma and review the current literature. A 78-year-old male presented with abdominal pain and CT enterography identified a ileal mass. A 79-year-old female presented with signs and symptoms of partial small bowel obstruction. Abdominopelvic CT and small bowel series revealed a obstructing mass in the distal jejunum. The masses were confirmed on laparotomy and histologically diagnosed as melanoma. Extensive postoperative clinical examination revealed no cutaneous lesions. A primary small bowel melanoma is an extremely rare neoplasm. A definite diagnosis can only be made after a thorough investigation has been made to exclude the coexistence of a primary lesion. Curative resection of the tumor remains the treatment of choice.

Local excision for ypT2 rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation therapy: it should not be justified.

PURPOSE: Among individuals who respond well to preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for ypT0-1, local excision (LE) could provide acceptable oncological outcomes. However, in ypT2 cases, the oncological safety of LE has not been determined. This study aimed to compare oncological outcomes between LE and total mesorectal excision of ypT2-stage rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy and investigate the oncological safety of LE in these patients. METHODS: We included 351 patients who exhibited ypT2-stage rectal cancer after CRT followed by LE (n = 16 [5%]) or total mesorectal excision (TME) (n = 335 [95%]) after preoperative CRT between January 2007 and December 2013. After propensity matching, oncological outcomes between LE group and TME group were compared. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 57 months (range, 12-113 months). In the LE group, local recurrence occurred more frequently (18 vs. 4%; p = 0.034) but not distant metastases (12 vs. 11%; p = 0.690). The 5-year local recurrence-free (76 vs. 96%; p = 0.006), disease-free (64 vs. 84%; p = 0.075), and overall survival (79 vs. 93%; p = 0.045) rates of the LE group were significantly lower than those of the TME group. After propensity matching, 5-year local recurrence-free survival of the LE group was significantly lower than that of the TME group (76 vs. 97%, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: The high local failure rate and poor oncological outcomes for ypT2-stage rectal cancer patients who undergo CRT followed by LE cannot be justified as an indication for LE. Salvage surgery should be recommended in these patients.

Risk factors for postoperative recurrence after primary bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease.

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors for postoperative recurrence after primary bowel resection in a cohort of Korean Crohn's disease (CD) patients. METHODS: This study included 260 patients with no history of previous bowel surgery who underwent primary surgery for CD between January 2000 and December 2010 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, South Korea). The median follow-up period was 101 mo. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 66 patients (25.4%) underwent a second operation for disease recurrence. At 1, 5 and 10 years after the first operation, the cumulative rate of surgical recurrence was 1.1%, 8.3% and 35.9% and clinical recurrence occurred in 1.2%, 23.6% and 68.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, undergoing an emergency operation was a significant risk factor for surgical recurrence-free survival (SRFS) [HR = 2.431, 95%CI: 1.394-4.240, P = 0.002], as were the presence of perianal disease after the first operation (HR = 1.715, 95%CI: 1.005-2.926, P = 0.048) and history of smoking (HR = 1.798, 95%CI: 1.088-2.969, P = 0.022). The postoperative use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents reduced SRFS risk (HR = 0.521, 95%CI: 0.300-0.904, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: History of smoking, postoperative perianal disease and undergoing an emergency operation were independent risk factors for surgical recurrence. Using anti-TNF agents may reduce surgical recurrence.

The long-term outcomes of recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction after colorectal cancer surgery favor surgical management.

An adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is generally caused by postoperative adhesions and is more frequently associated with colorectal surgeries than other procedures. We compared the outcomes of operative and conservative management of ASBO after primary colorectal cancer surgery.We retrospectively reviewed 5060 patients who underwent curative surgery for primary colorectal cancer; 388 of these patients (7.7%) were readmitted with a diagnosis of SBO. We analyzed the clinical course of these patients with reference to the cause of their surgery.Of the 388 SBO patients analyzed, 170 were diagnosed with ASBO. Their 3-, 5-, and 7-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.1%, 72.8%, and 61.5%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 59.2 months. Repeated conservative management for ASBO without surgical management led to higher recurrence rates: 21.0% after the first admission, 41.7% after the second, 60.0% after the third, and 100% after the fourth (P = .006). Surgical management was needed for 19.2%, 22.2%, 50%, and 66.7% of patients admitted with ASBO on the first to fourth hospitalizations, respectively. Repeated hospitalization for obstruction led to a greater possibility of surgical management (P = .001). Of 27 patients with surgical management at the first admission, 6 (17.6%) were readmitted with a diagnosis of SBO, but there were no further episodes of SBO in the surgically managed patients.Patients who undergo operative management for ASBO have a reduced risk of recurrence requiring hospitalization, whereas those with repeated conservative management have an increased risk of recurrence and require operative management. Operative management should be considered for recurrent SBO.

The prognostic significance and treatment modality for elevated pre- and postoperative serum CEA in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum CEA (s-CEA) changes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with sustained elevated postoperative s-CEA levels. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2008, 9,380 CRC patients underwent surgery. Curative resection was performed in 1,242 CRC patients with high preoperative s-CEA levels (>6 ng/mL). High s-CEA levels were normalized in 924 patients (74.4%) within 2 weeks from surgery, whereas high s-CEA levels were persistent in 318 patients (25.6%). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their postoperative s-CEA levels: group 1 (37 patients with a 1-year postoperative s-CEA>6 ng/mL) and group 2 (281 patients with a 1-year postoperative s-CEA≤6 ng/mL). RESULTS: A postoperative recurrence was identified in 24 patients (64.9%) in group 1 and 65 patients (23.1%) in group 2 (P < 0.001). A curative resection after recurrence was performed in 22 patients (33.8%) from group 2, but no patients from group 1 (P = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival and time to recurrence were significantly lower in patients with recurrent cancer in group 1 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent elevated postoperative s-CEA levels are at high risk for recurrence and a low survival rate. More intensive surveillance of patients with high postoperative s-CEA levels should be mandatory.