RESUMO
Venetoclax (VEN), a B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) selective inhibitor, is widely used for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with promising results. However, the anti-leukemic effect of VEN in relapsed/refractory (R/R)- AML requires improvement. In this study, we observed that combining homoharringtonine (HHT) with VEN plus azacitidine resulted in a significantly higher response and better survival than VA alone in patients with R/R-AML. Basic research indicates that HHT combined with VEN has a highly synergistic effect against both resistant AML cells and primary cells with/without mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) co-culture in vivo, inhibiting proliferation and colony-forming capacity of AML cells associated with concomitant cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, HHT sensitizes AML cells to VEN by downregulating the anti-apoptotic proteins MCL-1/BCL-xL, activating reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to mitochondrial membrane potential loss, and attenuating fatty acid (FA) uptake. These findings adding HHT to VEN-based regimens may enhance outcomes in R/R-AML patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: T(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/AML1-ETO positive acute myeloid leukemia (AE-AML) is sensitive to conventional chemotherapy with a favorable prognosis. However, recent small case reports suggest the limited effectiveness of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMA) in treating AE-AML. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VEN plus AZA (VA) in AE-AML and explore whether adding homoharringtonine (HHT) to VA (VAH) could improve the response. METHODS: Patients who received VEN plus AZA and HHT (VAH) or VEN plus AZA (VA) regimens were included in this retrospective study. The endpoints of this study were to evaluate the rate of composite complete remission (CRc), measurable residual disease (MRD), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse between VAH and VA groups. RESULTS: A total of 32 AE-AML patients who underwent VA or VAH treatments (newly diagnosed with VA, ND-VA, n = 8; relapsed/refractory with VA, R/R-VA, n = 10; relapsed/refractory with VAH, R/R-VAH, n = 14) were included. The CR (complete remission) /CRi (CR with incomplete count recovery) rate of ND-VA, R/R-VA and R/R-VAH were 25%, 10%, and 64.3%, respectively. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative was observed in 66.7% of R/R-VAH and none of VA-R/R patients. Co-occurring methylation mutations are associated with poor outcomes with VA but exhibit a more favorable response with VAH treatment. Additionally, patients with c-kit mutation presented inferior outcomes with both VEN-based regimens. All regimens were tolerated well by all patients. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed the poor response of VA in AE-AML, whether used as frontline or salvage therapy. Adding HHT to VA may improve outcomes and enhance the efficacy of VEN in this population.