[Questionnaire Survey on the Timing of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Advanced Recurrent Colorectal Cancer and Its Impact on Patients].

BACKGROUNDS: Comprehensive genomic profiling(CGP)has been covered by health insurance since June 2019. However, the clinical impact of CGP on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)remains unclear. To date, there are very limited reports regarding patient-oriented outcomes of CGP in mCRC. PATIENTS: A questionnaire was completed by patients with mCRC who had already received their CGP results after April 2021. Eight questions were posed, covering the degree of satisfaction and timing when CGP was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients with mCRC who had received their CGP test results by August 2021 in our department, 21 patients responded to our questionnaire. In total 66.7% patients with mCRC answered "(very)satisfied"with the CGP testing. 28.6% of the patients already knew about CGP testing before their local doctors informed them. Except for 3 patients who did not answer, 47.6% and 9.5% of patients with mCRC"agreed"and "moderately agreed"with the timing of the CGP test. CONCLUSION: Although most patients with mCRC failed to access promising new treatment via CGP, approximately half of the patients answered that they were satisfied with the CGP testing. Conversely, a few patients already knew about CGP testing before it was proposed by their doctors. Thus, the provision of information at an early stage is necessary.

[Educational Project of Self-Removal of the Intravenous Central Venous Access Port Guided by Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Instructed by a Nurse in the University Hospital].

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil infusion for 46±5h from the central venous(CV)port is required for mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer(CRC), followed by self-removal of the needle by patients. At our hospital, outpatients were instructed for self-removal of the needle, but the results were unsatisfactory. Therefore, instructions for self-removal of the needle from the CV port have been initiated at the patient ward since April 2019, making use of a hospital stay of 3 days. PATIENTS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with chemotherapy-introduced advanced CRC from the CV port who received instructions for self-removal of the needle in the outpatient department and ward between January 2018 and December 2021. RESULTS: Of all patients with advanced CRC, 21 received instructions at the outpatient department(OP)while 67 at patient ward(PW). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others were similar: 47% in OP and 52% in PW(p=0.80). However, after several additional instructions involving their families, it was higher in PW than in OP(97.0 vs 76.1%, p=0.005). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others in those aged≥75/<75, and≥65/<65 years were 0%/61.1%, and 35.4%/67.5%, respectively. OP was as a risk factor for failed self-removal of the needle in the logistic regression analysis(odds ratio: 11.19, 95%CI: 1.86- 67.30). CONCLUSION: Repeated instructions involving patients' families during the hospital stay improved the incidence of successful self-removal of the needle. Involvement of patients' families from the beginning may effectively improve self- removal of the needle, particularly in the elderly patients with advanced CRC.

[Challenge of Skin Treatment Led by Nurses and Pharmacists for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR Antibodies].

Preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists was started for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)who received anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Incidence of skin-related toxicities, amount of topical moisturizers used, and administered cycles of anti-EGFR antibody were retrospectively compared between a preemptive skin treatment group and a control group. Thirty-four mCRC patients before the introduction of preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and 23 mCRC patients treated with preemptive skin treatment led by nurses were evaluated. The incidence of 6- and 12- week Grade 2 or higher skin-related toxicity was 23.5% in the control group and 8.7% in the preemptive group(p=0.18), and 67.7% in the control group and 30.4% in the preemptive group(p=0.0076), respectively. Mean amounts of moisturizer used were both lower in the control group than in the preemptive group at both 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks(6 weeks; 275 g vs 550 g, p=0.036, 7-12 weeks; 575 g vs 1,175 g, p=0.013). However, the amount of topical steroid used was similar in both groups. Preemptive moisturizer skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists may decrease the incidence of skin- related toxicity.

[Cross-Functional Project of Using Information-Sharing Tool for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in University Hospital].

Treatment for late-stage cancer patients should be discussed depending on the patients' will, however it is not sometimes fully discussed in our daily practice. Based on this background, the information-sharing tool for metastatic colorectal cancer patients, who are refractory to first-line and second-line chemotherapy and/or who are given a year to live, has been introduced in our university hospital since November 2019. To evaluate the utility of this tool, the influence of the tools on the outcome of the patients was evaluated. Regarding the comparison between the patients before and after the introduction of the information-sharing tool, the period between the day of the consent to the DNAR between the day of the death is longer in the patients after the introduction than those before the introduction(median 43 vs 6 days, p=0.025). The introduction of the information-sharing tool can provide the metastatic colorectal cancer patients with more opportunities to discuss how to spend the rest of their lives and with longer time at the place where they want to stay.