Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bone Joint J ; 97-B(8): 1046-9, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26224819

RESUMO

The aims of this study were to determine the functional impact and financial burden of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our secondary goal was to determine whether there was a difference between patients who were treated non-operatively and those who were treated operatively. We retrospectively reviewed 71 patients who had suffered dislocation of a primary THA. Their mean age was 67 years (41 to 92) and the mean follow-up was 3.8 years (2.1 to 8.2). Because patients with recurrent dislocation were three times more likely to undergo operative treatment (p < 0.0001), they ultimately had a significantly higher mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) (p = 0.0001), lower mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p = 0.001) and a higher mean SF-12 score (p < 0.0001) than patients with a single dislocation. Likewise, those who underwent operative treatment had a higher mean HHS (p < 0.0001), lower mean WOMAC score (p < 0.0001) and a higher mean SF-12 score (p < 0.0001) than those who were treated non-operatively. Recurrent dislocation and operative treatment increased costs by 300% (£11 456; p < 0.0001) and 40% (£5217; p < 0.0001), respectively. The operative treatment of recurrent dislocation results in significantly better function than non-operative management. Moreover, the increase in costs for operative treatment is modest compared with that of non-operative measures.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Luxação do Quadril/economia , Luxação do Quadril/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Bone Joint J ; 96-B(11 Supple A): 48-55, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25381408

RESUMO

We are currently facing an epidemic of periprosthetic fractures around the hip. They may occur either during surgery or post-operatively. Although the acetabulum may be involved, the femur is most commonly affected. We are being presented with new, difficult fracture patterns around cemented and cementless implants, and we face the challenge of an elderly population who may have grossly deficient bone and may struggle to rehabilitate after such injuries. The correct surgical management of these fractures is challenging. This article will review the current choices of implants and techniques available to deal with periprosthetic fractures of the femur.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA