Public sentiment on the global outbreak of monkeypox: an unsupervised machine learning analysis of 352,182 twitter posts.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to study the public's sentiments on the current monkeypox outbreaks via an unsupervised machine learning analysis of social media posts. STUDY DESIGN: This was an exploratory analysis of tweets sentiments. METHODS: We extracted original tweets containing the terms 'monkeypox', 'monkey pox' or 'monkey_pox' and posted them in the English language from 6 May 2022 (first case detected in the United Kingdom) to 23 July 2022 (when World Health Organization declared Monkeypox to be a global health emergency). Retweets and duplicate tweets were excluded from study. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) Named Entity Recognition. This was followed by topic modelling (specifically BERTopic) and manual thematic analysis by the study team, with independent reviews of the topic labels and themes. RESULTS: Based on topic modelling and thematic analysis of a total of 352,182 Twitter posts, we derived five topics clustered into three major themes related to the public discourse on the ongoing outbreaks. These include concerns of safety, stigmatisation of minority communities, and a general lack of faith in public institutions. The public sentiments underscore growing (and existing) partisanship, personal health worries in relation to the evolving situation, as well as concerns of the media's portrayal of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer and minority communities, which might further stigmatise these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Monkeypox is an emerging infectious disease of public concern. Our study has highlighted important societal issues, including misinformation, political mistrust and anti-gay stigma that should be sensitively considered when designing public health policies to contain the ongoing outbreaks.

Impact of COVID-19 on environmental services workers in healthcare settings: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, demand for deep cleaning and environmental services workers grew exponentially. Although there is extant literature examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, less emphasis has been placed on environmental services workers, who play an equally important front-line role. AIM: To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental services workers employed in healthcare settings. METHODS: Scoping review methodology. A search strategy was developed, in consultation with a medical information specialist, employing various combinations of the keywords [(environmental services worker OR health attendant OR housekeeping) AND (COVID OR coronavirus OR pandemic OR epidemic)]. Four bibliographical databases were searched from inception to 5th July 2022: OVID Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Cochrane Database. RESULTS: In total, 24 studies were included in this review. The studies were generally cross-sectional in design. Seroprevalence studies highlighted significantly higher rates of COVID-19 among environmental services workers (housekeeping, cleaning and janitorial staff) compared with other clinical and non-clinical staff in the same institutions. In addition, based on qualitative interviews, environmental services workers experienced greater psychological stress working during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental services workers were particularly vulnerable to increased work stress and COVID-19 during the pandemic. Health systems need to do more to support these workers. Further research could investigate specific policy and procedural changes to benefit this under-recognized group in the greater healthcare workforce.