The Impact of Fellowship Affiliation on Urogynecology Training in Obstetrics & Gynecology Residency.

OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics of Urogynecology training and number of "Incontinence and Pelvic Floor" cases logged between OB/GYN residencies affiliated and those not affiliated with Urogynecology fellowships. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed of OB/GYN residency programs, their Urogynecology training, and association with Urogynecology fellowship programs during the 2023-2024 academic year. Program websites for ACGME-accredited OB/GYN residency programs were reviewed to determine availability, timing, and length of Urogynecology training. ACGME data for "Incontinence and Pelvic Floor" cases were analyzed by training year and association with Urogynecology fellowship programs from the 2012-2013 to 2022-2023 academic year. Data was analyzed using SPSS. SETTING: This research was conducted at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None RESULTS: Information was obtained for 85.9% of programs. Nearly all (97.0%) had dedicated Urogynecology rotations, and 64.4% had rotations in > 1 year of training. Association with Urogynecology fellowship did not affect the availability of Urogynecology training overall nor the overall number of rotations. Urogynecology rotations occurred most often in the third (PGY3) year of residency, though 43.6% of programs had training for junior (PGY1, PGY2) residents. Residencies with associated Urogynecology fellowships were more likely to have a rotation for PGY2 residents and for junior residents overall. From 2012-2023, the number of "Incontinence and Pelvic Floor" cases declined by 36.3%, with trainees at residencies not affiliated with Urogynecology fellowships logging more cases than those at a fellowship-affiliated residency. CONCLUSION: While the majority of OB/GYN residencies have dedicated Urogynecology training, most rotations are for senior residents. Training programs associated with Urogynecology fellowships are more likely to expose junior residents to the field, but their trainees log fewer "Incontinence and Pelvic Floor" cases overall. Earlier exposure may enrich surgical training and help residents prepare for their career, whether in Urogynecology or as a generalist.

Urinary Incontinence Care in the Academic and Safety-Net Primary Care Settings: Opportunities to Improve Quality of Care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of urinary incontinence (UI) care for women in the safety-net and nonsafety-net settings prior to referral to a specialist. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 200 women from two nonsafety-net hospitals and 188 women from two safety-net hospitals who were referred to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery specialists for bothersome UI between March 2017 and March 2020. We evaluated the care that women received 12 months prior to referral, by measuring adherence to a set of previously developed quality indicators (QIs), for example, the performance of a urinalysis or pelvic exam. RESULTS: Women seen in safety-net hospitals were more likely to receive QI-compliant care than women in the nonsafety-net hospitals prior to referral, with 55.53% of appropriate care given in the safety-net vs 40.3% in the nonsafety-net setting (P <.01). Clinicians in the safety-net hospitals were more likely to adhere to QIs in patients with general, stress, and urgency incontinence. CONCLUSION: Women were more likely to receive timely, quality-based UI care in the safety net compared to the nonsafety-net setting. This may be in part due to aspects unique to the safety-net system, including an eConsult referral system, which guides referring clinicians in appropriate management steps that should be taken prior to the specialist visit, as well as women's health-focused primary care clinics.

The "Repeat Colpocleisis": A Literature Review and Case Report.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Colpocleisis is a surgical procedure intended to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Compared with other modes of pelvic reconstructive surgery, colpocleisis is associated with lower morbidity and higher satisfaction, and has a success rate of 91-100% and a reoperation rate of less than 2%. However, there is limited information on how to treat recurrent prolapse after colpocleisis. METHODS: We performed a review of the existing literature regarding colpocleisis failure and retreatment. A total of 118 articles were reviewed, with 16 articles suitable for inclusion. We also describe a case from our own institution of a "repeat colpocleisis" for recurrent prolapse after previous colpocleisis. RESULTS: "Repeat colpocleisis" was the most common surgical technique used (18 out of 24 patients, 75.0%). The median follow-up time after the repeat surgery was 12 months, with only 1 patient with recurrence reported owing to recurrent rectocele 2 years after surgery, treated successfully with perineorrhaphy. Other less common techniques included perineorrhaphy, reversal of colpocleisis with native tissue repair, and vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal repair. Our case report describes the surgical management of a patient who had previously undergone LeFort colpocleisis with recurrence of prolapse, subsequently undergoing repeat colpocleisis. CONCLUSIONS: The colpocleisis failure, though rare, presents a surgical challenge owing to both its rarity and the paucity of information in the literature regarding the optimal mode of management. In this review, the most common technique for surgical management of colpocleisis failure was repeat colpocleisis, with good short-term success rates noted. Additional studies with longer-term follow-up are needed.