Intention to Initiate HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Cisgender Women in a High HIV Prevalence U.S. City.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the individual, interpersonal, community, health-system, and structural factors that influence HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation among cisgender women seeking sexual and reproductive health care in a high HIV prevalence community to inform future clinic-based PrEP interventions. METHODS: We collected anonymous, tablet-based questionnaires from a convenience sample of cisgender women in family planning and sexual health clinics in the District of Columbia. The survey used the lens of the socio-ecological model to measure individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and structural factors surrounding intention to initiate PrEP. The survey queried demographics, behavioral exposure to HIV, perceived risk of HIV acquisition, a priori awareness of PrEP, intention to initiate PrEP, and factors influencing intention to initiate PrEP. RESULTS: A total of 1437 cisgender women completed the survey. By socio-ecological level, intention to initiate PrEP was associated with positive attitudes toward PrEP (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.15) and higher self-efficacy (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.72) on the individual level, perceived future utilization of PrEP among peers and low fear of shame/stigma (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.04) on the community level, and having discussed PrEP with a provider (OR. 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20-4.75) on the institutional level. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of multilevel, clinic-based interventions for cisgender women, which promote sex-positive and preventive PrEP messaging, peer navigation to destigmatize PrEP, and education and support for women's health medical providers in the provision of PrEP services for cisgender women.

A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.

BACKGROUND: Most obstetric emergencies are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). The Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, eliminated constitutional protection of abortion rights, allowing states to swiftly enact laws that can greatly change reproductive medicine. In this post-Roe landscape, the ambiguity and uncertainty being imposed on clinicians regarding the legality of certain interventions may have catastrophic effects. To understand and plan for the changes that will come and attempt to mitigate adverse outcomes, the authors first assessed the current state of pregnancy-related complication care in the ED setting. This study utilized data obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to evaluate trends in pregnancy-related ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that could be impacted by restricted abortion access and trigger laws. The authors subsequently analyzed the legislative changes and translated the pertinent ones to dispel misunderstandings and provide a framework for appropriate medical practice. METHODS: The retrospective study utilized data from the NHAMCS database from 2016 to 2020, encompassing an estimated total of 4,556,778 pregnancy-related ED visits. NHAMCS is a multi-stage probabilistic sample collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using an annual survey of EDs in the United States. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportions and 95% confidence intervals Furthermore, the supreme court decision was analyzed in addition to multiple state laws and legal texts. The findings were summarized and discussed. RESULTS: The majority (79.4%) of all studied visits were for patients between the ages of 18-34 years, capturing those in peak reproductive years. This age group also comprised of the bulk (76.4%) of visits for pathologic pregnancies, including ectopic and molar pregnancies, and 79.8% of visits for a spontaneous miscarriage or threatened miscarriage in early pregnancy. Black patients accounted for 25.7%, white patients 70.1%. Regarding ethnicity, patients were separated into Hispanic and non-Hispanic, with Hispanic patients comprising 27% of all ED visits for included diagnoses between 2016 and 2020. Most visits for complications following an induced abortion occurred in the south (70.8%) and were nearly twice as likely to occur in non-metropolitan areas. Approximately 18% patients presenting with a pathologic pregnancy required admission to the hospital and approximately 50% of those visits for pathologic pregnancies and visits for bleeding in pregnancy had a procedure in the ED (49.8% and 49.5%). There were 111,264 estimated visits in which methotrexate was administered, amounting to approximately 1 in 7 visits for ectopic or molar pregnancy. In this data set, approximately 14,000 miscarriage and early bleeding patients received misoprostol. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-related ED visits comprise of a significant proportion of emergency care. As it relates to many of the trends previously elucidated on, the true extent of the burden cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that contrary to popular belief, Dobbs v. Jackson does not prohibit termination of pregnancy in the setting of life-threatening conditions to the mother, including ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and others, but the resultant uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding the constitutional change is leading to an over-compliance of the law, necessarily obstructing reproductive health care. The authors recommend that physicians be mindful of the rapidly-evolving laws in their particular state, and to also practice in accordance with Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Patient safety must be prioritized.

Gabapentin as an adjunct for pain management during dilation and evacuation: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the analgesic efficacy of preoperative gabapentin among patients undergoing dilation and evacuation (D&E) with moderate sedation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial among patients undergoing same-day D&E at 14 to 19 weeks gestation under moderate sedation. We randomized participants 1:1 to gabapentin 600 mg or placebo after cervical preparation at least 1 hour prior to D&E. We assessed pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale before, during, and after the procedure. The primary outcome was postoperative recall of maximum procedural pain with a 13-mm a priori threshold for clinical significance. We standardized initial fentanyl and midazolam dosing. We assessed satisfaction with pain control, nausea, and vomiting via Likert scales and anxiety using a validated instrument. RESULTS: We enrolled 126 participants and randomized 61 to gabapentin and 65 to placebo, with study medication administered a mean of 211 (SD 64) minutes preoperatively. Recall of maximum pain was 41 mm for gabapentin and 49 mm for placebo (p = 0.24). Gabapentin resulted in reduced pain during uterine aspiration (56 vs 71 mm, p= 0.003) compared to placebo, but not for any other time points. The gabapentin group had higher satisfaction (78% vs 65% very or somewhat satisfied, p= 0.01). Median fentanyl dose was lower in the gabapentin group (75 vs 100 mcg, p = 0.005). Midazolam dose, nausea, vomiting, and anxiety did not differ between groups. No serious adverse events occurred in the gabapentin group. Sedation reversal was not required. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of gabapentin to moderate sedation during D&E did not result in lower maximum recalled procedural pain. Gabapentin resulted in reduced intra-operative pain during uterine aspiration and increased satisfaction with pain control. IMPLICATIONS: Gabapentin reduces intraoperative pain and improves satisfaction with pain management when administered prior to second-trimester surgical abortion and may be considered as an adjunct to intravenous sedation. Moderate sedation may impair assessment and recall of pain. Additional research is needed to identify the most effective pain management regimens for D&E.

Integrating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis into Family Planning Care: A RE-AIM Framework Evaluation.

We aimed to systematically evaluate the feasibility of integrating HIV prevention services, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), into a family planning setting in a high-prevalence community. We used the RE-AIM Framework (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to evaluate the integration of HIV prevention services into a family planning clinic over 6 months. Before the integration, PrEP was not offered. We implemented a staff training program on HIV PrEP. We determined the proportion of women presenting to the clinic who were screened, eligible for, and initiated PrEP through chart review. We assessed staff comfort with PrEP pre- and post-integration. We compared planned and actual implementation, interviewed staff to determine barriers and facilitators, and tracked systems adaptations. We assessed maintenance of PrEP after the study concluded. There were 640 clinical encounters for 515 patients; the rate of HIV counseling and PrEP screening was 50%. The rate was 10% in month 1 and peaked to 65% in month 3. Nearly all screened patients were eligible for PrEP (98.4%) and 15 patients (6%) initiated PrEP. Staff knowledge and comfort discussing PrEP improved after education. Facilitators included partnering with local experts, continuing education, clinical tools for providers, and patient education materials. Barriers included competing priorities during clinical encounters, limited woman-centered patient education materials, and insurance-related barriers. Embedding HIV prevention services in the family planning setting was feasible in this pilot. The proportion of women screened for PrEP rapidly increased. In this high HIV prevalence community, nearly all screened women were eligible and 6% initiated PrEP.

A factorial-design randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol alone to Dilapan with misoprostol and comparing buccal to vaginal misoprostol for same-day cervical preparation prior to dilation & evacuation at 14 weeks 0 days-19 weeks 6 days gestation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare procedure times following same-day cervical preparation using misoprostol 400 mcg alone or misoprostol 400 mcg plus hygroscopic dilators for dilation and evacuation (D&E) before 20 weeks gestation and to compare side effects of buccal and vaginal misoprostol administration. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized women undergoing D&E at 14 weeks 0 days-19 weeks 6 days gestation to receive (1) hygroscopic dilators or not and (2) buccal or vaginal misoprostol using a 2 × 2 factorial design. We assessed two primary outcomes: (1) total procedure time, defined as time to insert hygroscopic dilators plus D&E time, and (2) side effects of misoprostol 4-6 h after initiation of cervical preparation using a 5-point Likert scale assessing nausea, emesis, diarrhea, chills and cramps. RESULTS: We randomized 163 women and 161 completed the study. We completed all procedures in one day. Mean total procedure time was 14.0 and 10.8 min. with and without hygroscopic dilators (difference 3.2 minutes, 95% CI 1.7, 4.6). Mean D&E procedure time was 0.7 (95% CI -0.8, 2.1) min longer without hygroscopic dilators. Initial cervical dilation was 15.6 and 11.7 mm with and without hygroscopic dilators (difference 3.9 mm, 95% CI 3.1, 4.8). Participants receiving buccal misoprostol reported less chills (1.9) than women receiving vaginal misoprostol (2.3), p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Hygroscopic dilators with misoprostol requires more time and increases cervical dilation without shortening D&E time when used for cervical preparation 4-6 h prior to D&E before 20 weeks. Women receiving vaginal misoprostol may have more chills compared to buccal misoprostol. IMPLICATIONS: Adding hygroscopic dilators to misoprostol for same day D&E procedures at less than 20 weeks gestation increases total intervention time without reducing D&E time and is less favored by patients. Clinical judgment requires balancing relative effectiveness with patient preference. Further studies should evaluate the side effect profile of vaginal misoprostol.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated initial cervical dilation with the addition of oral mifepristone to vaginal misoprostol as cervical preparation for same-daysecond-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E). STUDY DESIGN: Women desiring abortion between gestational ages 14weeks 0days and 19weeks 6days were randomized to 200-mg mifepristone or identical placebo immediately followed by 400-mcg misoprostol vaginally 4-6h prior to D&E. Primary outcome was cervical dilation assessed by largest Hegar dilator passed without resistance. Secondary outcomes included total procedure time and participant and provider perceptions. We had 90% power to detect a 2-mm change in initial cervical dilation with a mean of 10mm (SD=3.0mm), requiring 48 participants in each arm. RESULTS: Of 100 women enrolled, 96 were randomized and completed the study. Age, race, gestational age (mean 17.4weeks, SD=1.3) and parity did not significantly differ. Mean initial Hegar dilation measurements were 11.7 and 10.9mm in the mifepristone and placebo groups, respectively, with difference of 0.8 [95% CI=-0.4, 2.0mm]. We found total procedure times of 11.8 and 13.0min, respectively (difference of 1.2min [95% CI=-2.4, 4.8min]. Participant and provider perceptions did not differ. All 96 procedures were completed without hemorrhage, cervical laceration or other observed complications. CONCLUSION: The addition of mifepristone to vaginal misoprostol did not provide a significant increase in cervical dilation compared to misoprostol alone as cervical preparation 4-6h prior to D&E at 14weeks through 19weeks 6days. IMPLICATIONS: Adding mifepristone for a short interval (4-6h) did not improve cervical preparation with misoprostol prior to D&E at 14-19weeks. Future studies should evaluate alternative timing intervals of medications for this purpose.

Use of cell-free DNA in the investigation of intrauterine fetal demise and miscarriage.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether cell-free DNA is present in nonviable pregnancies and thus can be used in diagnostic evaluation in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 50 participants at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, between June 2013 and January 2014. Included were women with pregnancies complicated by missed abortion or fetal demise. All gestational ages were considered for study participation. Participants with fetal demise were offered the standard workup for fetal death per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Maternal blood samples were processed to determine the presence of cell-free DNA, the corresponding fetal fractions, and genetic abnormalities. RESULTS: Fifty samples from nonviable pregnancies were analyzed. The average clinical gestational age was 16.9 weeks (standard deviation 9.2). The mean maternal body mass index was 30.3 (standard deviation 9.1). Seventy-six percent (38/50) of samples yielded cell-free DNA results, that is, had fetal fractions within the detectable range of 3.7-65%. Among the 38, 76% (29) were classified as euploid, 21% (8) as trisomies, and 3% (1) as microdeletion. A cell-free DNA result was obtained more frequently at ultrasonographic gestational ages of 8 weeks or greater compared with less than 8 weeks (87.9% [n=29/33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72.7-95.2; and 52.9%, n=9/17, 95% CI 31.0-73.8] of the time, respectively, P=.012). Time from demise was not associated with obtaining a result. CONCLUSION: Among nonviable pregnancies, cell-free DNA is present in the maternal plasma with fetal fractions greater than 3.7% in more than three fourths of cases after an ultrasonographic gestational age of 8 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01916928. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.