Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 35, 2024 Jan 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38231364

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate the impact of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) in postoperative analgesia and delirium in elderly patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 120 patients who undergone TKA were randomly assigned into group D + R (dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine) and group R (only ropivacaine), with 60 cases in each group. The pain scores at rest and exercise at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively. The occurrence of delirium on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3 postoperatively were measured, and the sleep quality was evaluated before surgery, the night of surgery, and 24 h postoperatively to observe the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Visual analogu scale (VAS) of group D + R at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively were lower than those of group R in both rest and exercise states. The incidence of postoperative delirium in group D + R was lower than that in group R on Day 1 and Day 2. Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores in group D + R were lower than those in group R. There was no significant difference in postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups. Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine improves postoperative analgesia and sleep quality, and alleviates the occurrence of postoperative delirium in elderly patients with TKA.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Artroplastia do Joelho , Dexmedetomidina , Delírio do Despertar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Ropivacaina , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 131(2): 253-265, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common and disturbing postoperative complication that might be ameliorated by propofol-based anaesthesia. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that there is less delirium after propofol-based than after sevoflurane-based anaesthesia within 7 days of major cancer surgery. METHODS: This multicentre randomised trial was conducted in 14 tertiary care hospitals in China. Patients aged 65-90 yr undergoing major cancer surgery were randomised to either propofol-based anaesthesia or to sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium within 7 postoperative days. RESULTS: A total of 1228 subjects were enrolled and randomised, with 1195 subjects included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (mean age 71 yr; 422 [35%] women); one subject died before delirium assessment. Delirium occurred in 8.4% (50/597) of subjects given propofol-based anaesthesia vs 12.4% (74/597) of subjects given sevoflurane-based anaesthesia (relative risk 0.68 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.48-0.95]; P=0.023; adjusted relative risk 0.59 [95% CI: 0.39-0.90]; P=0.014). Delirium reduction mainly occurred on the first day after surgery, with a prevalence of 5.4% (32/597) with propofol anaesthesia vs 10.7% (64/597) with sevoflurane anaesthesia (relative risk 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.75]; P=0.001). Secondary endpoints, including ICU admission, postoperative duration of hospitalisation, major complications within 30 days, cognitive function at 30 days and 3 yr, and safety outcomes, did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium was a third less common after propofol than sevoflurane anaesthesia in older patients having major cancer surgery. Clinicians might therefore reasonably select propofol-based anaesthesia in patients at high risk of postoperative delirium. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-15006209) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02662257).


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Delírio do Despertar , Neoplasias , Propofol , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Sevoflurano/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Delírio do Despertar/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/cirurgia
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 131(2): 266-275, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474242

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Experimental evidence indicates that i.v. anaesthesia might reduce cancer recurrence compared with volatile anaesthesia, but clinical information is observational only. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that propofol-based anaesthesia improves survival over 3 or more years after potentially curative major cancer surgery. METHODS: This was a long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial in 14 tertiary hospitals in China. We enrolled 1228 patients aged 65-90 yr who were scheduled for major cancer surgery. They were randomised to either propofol-based i.v. anaesthesia or to sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was overall survival after surgery. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survival. RESULTS: Amongst subjects randomised, 1195 (mean age 72 yr; 773 [65%] male) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 188 deaths amongst 598 patients (31%) assigned to propofol-based anaesthesia compared with 175 deaths amongst 597 patients (29%) assigned to sevoflurane-based anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.26; P=0.834. Recurrence-free survival was 223/598 (37%) in patients given propofol anaesthesia vs 206/597 (35%) given sevoflurane anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI: 0.89-1.30; P=0.465. Event-free survival was 294/598 (49%) in patients given propofol anaesthesia vs 274/597 (46%) given sevoflurane anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.29; P=0.298. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after major cancer surgery was similar with i.v. and volatile anaesthesia. Propofol-based iv. anaesthesia should not be used for cancer surgery with the expectation that it will improve overall or cancer-specific survival. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ChiCTR-IPR-15006209; NCT02660411.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Propofol , Sevoflurano , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Sevoflurano/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Seguimentos , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Anestesia por Inalação , Sobreviventes de Câncer
4.
World J Clin Cases ; 9(23): 6698-6704, 2021 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34447816

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The choice of anesthesia for cesarean section is very important. AIM: To compare the effects of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl on newborns after cesarean section. METHODS: We randomly divided one hundred and twenty patients undergoing cesarean section into the following 4 groups: group B (bupivacaine group), group BF10 (bupivacaine combined with 10 µg fentanyl), group BF30 (bupivacaine combined with 30 µg fentanyl) and group BF50 (bupivacaine combined with 50 µg fentanyl). The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, block plane fixation time and sensory block time were recorded. Umbilical artery blood was then collected immediately after fetal delivery for blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl. Additionally, data on the neonatal 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores, results of umbilical artery blood gas analysis and qualitative detection of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood were recorded. RESULTS: Although the mean arterial pressure decreased in all four groups at 3 min after anesthesia, the percentage of the decrease was less than 20% of the baseline. In addition, there were no significant differences in the 1-min or 5-min Apgar scores or the umbilical artery blood gas analysis among the four groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, the concentration of fentanyl in umbilical artery blood was qualitatively detected using an ELISA kit, and the results in the four groups were negative. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine combined with fentanyl spinal anesthesia is effective in cesarean section.

5.
BMJ Open ; 7(11): e018607, 2017 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29187413

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients who have solid organ cancer often receive surgery. Some of them may develop delirium after surgery and delirium development is associated with worse outcomes. Furthermore, despite all of the advances in medical care, the long-term survival in cancer patients is far from optimal. Evidences suggest that choice of anaesthetics during surgery, that is, either inhalational or intravenous anaesthetics, may influence outcomes. However, the impact of general anaesthesia type on the occurrence of postoperative delirium is inconclusive. Although retrospective studies suggest that propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia was associated with longer survival after cancer surgery when compared with inhalational anaesthesia, prospective studies as such are still lacking. The purposes of this randomised controlled trial are to test the hypotheses that when compared with sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia, propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia may reduce the incidence of early delirium and prolong long-term survival in elderly patients after major cancer surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms. 1200 elderly patients (≥65 years but <90 years) who are scheduled to undergo major cancer surgery (with predicted duration ≥2 hours) are randomised to receive either sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia or propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia. Other anaesthetics and supplemental drugs including sedatives, opioids and muscle relaxants are administered in both arms according to routine practice. The primary early outcome is the incidence of 7-day delirium after surgery and the primary long-term outcome is the duration of 3-year survival after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committees of Peking University First Hospital (2015[869]) and all participating centres. The results of early and long-term outcomes will be analysed and reported separately. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IPR-15006209; NCT02662257; NCT02660411.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Delírio/epidemiologia , Éteres Metílicos/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , China , Delírio/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Éteres Metílicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sevoflurano , Taxa de Sobrevida
6.
Zhong Yao Cai ; 30(9): 1109-13, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18236757

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of extract of Ginkgo biloba (EGb) on vascular endothelial dysfunction induced by AGEs and to investigate the potential mechanisms. METHODS: Exogenous glycosylated bovine serum Albumin (AGEs-BSA) was prepared according to the methods of article. Vascular endothelial dysfunction was induced by tail vein injection of AGEs-BSA. The treatment group rats were given tail vein injections with AGEs-BSA followed by immediate intragastric of EGb (15,30 mg/kg/day, respectively) for 30 days. At the end of 30 days period, rats were anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital. Blood samples were collected from the carotid artery for biochemical assay of NO, MDA, SOD, DDAH, ADMA. The thoracic aorta was immediately isolated and cut into rings of 3 - 4 mm. Then ACh-induced EDR response and sodium SNP-induced endothelium-independent relaxation of aortic rings were examined. RESULTS: Results from in vivo experiments showed that the injection of AGEs-BSA significantly inhibited ACh-induced EDR response, but had no effect on SNP-induced endothelial-independent relaxation. The injection of AGEs-BSA decreased concentration of serum NO, activity of serum SOD and elevated serum MDA and ADMA level. Egb markedly attenuated AGEs-BSA induced inhibition of EDR response, increase of serum MDA and ADMA level, reduction of both NO level and activity of serum SOD.


Assuntos
Cardiotônicos/farmacologia , Endotélio Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Ginkgo biloba/química , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Acetilcolina/farmacologia , Amidoidrolases/metabolismo , Animais , Aorta Torácica/efeitos dos fármacos , Aorta Torácica/fisiologia , Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Produtos Finais de Glicação Avançada/química , Produtos Finais de Glicação Avançada/toxicidade , Técnicas In Vitro , Masculino , Malondialdeído/sangue , Óxido Nítrico/sangue , Nitroprussiato/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Soroalbumina Bovina/química , Soroalbumina Bovina/toxicidade , Superóxido Dismutase/sangue , Vasodilatação/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasodilatadores/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA