RESUMO
AIM: To benchmark the quality of bariatric service delivery against moving and handling and patient care best practice standards, and determine the prevalence of hospitalised patients admitted to Wellington Regional Hospital requiring bariatric level care. METHODS: A clinical audit consisting of retrospective case-note review and cross-sectional survey was conducted and benchmarked against Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) national standards. Information recorded included patient demographics, admission planning, patient anthropometric and risk assessments, provider communication, room preparation, mobilisation plan, equipment needs, space and facility design considerations, discharge planning and reportable events. RESULTS: A total of 574 patients were included. The prevalence of hospitalised patients requiring bariatric services was 6.4%. One third of patients (34.3%) were not identified by clinical teams as requiring bariatric support. Most bed (80%) and bathroom (83%) spaces failed to achieve the facility design standard. The majority of patient focused moving and handling hazards were documented whereas environmental hazards or equipment limitations were poorly reported. Only 26.1% of patients had a documented discharge plan. CONCLUSION: Inadequate identification of patients requiring bariatric support and insufficient documentation of bariatric service delivery were identified. Improving policy adherence will address shortcomings in the provision of a safe environment and high quality care for bariatric patients.