Protein delivery in intermittent and continuous enteral nutrition with a protein-rich formula in critically ill patients-a protocol for the prospective randomized controlled proof-of-concept Protein Bolus Nutrition (Pro BoNo) study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients rapidly develop muscle wasting resulting in sarcopenia, long-term disability and higher mortality. Bolus nutrition (30-60 min period), whilst having a similar incidence of aspiration as continuous feeding, seems to provide metabolic benefits through increased muscle protein synthesis due to higher leucine peaks. To date, clinical evidence on achievement of nutritional goals and influence of bolus nutrition on skeletal muscle metabolism in ICU patients is lacking. The aim of the Pro BoNo study (Protein Bolus Nutrition) is to compare intermittent and continuous enteral feeding with a specific high-protein formula. We hypothesise that target quantity of protein is reached earlier (within 36 h) by an intermittent feeding protocol with a favourable influence on muscle protein synthesis. METHODS: Pro BoNo is a prospective randomised controlled study aiming to compare the impact of intermittent and continuous enteral feeding on preventing muscle wasting in 60 critically ill patients recruited during the first 48 h after ICU admission. The primary outcome measure is the time until the daily protein target (≥ 1.5 g protein/kg bodyweight/24 h) is achieved. Secondary outcome measures include tolerance of enteral feeding and evolution of glucose, urea and IGF-1. Ultrasound and muscle biopsy of the quadriceps will be performed. DISCUSSION: The Basel Pro BoNo study aims to collect innovative data on the effect of intermittent enteral feeding of critically ill patients on muscle wasting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03587870 . Registered on July 16, 2018. Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal SNCTP000003234. Last updated on July 24, 2019.

Sublingual microcirculation does not reflect red blood cell transfusion thresholds in the intensive care unit-a prospective observational study in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Hemoglobin (Hb) transfusion thresholds are established in intensive care units. A restrictive transfusion threshold (Hb 70-75 g/l) is recommended in septic patients, and a liberal transfusion threshold (Hb 90 g/l) for cardiogenic shock. It is unclear whether these historically adopted transfusion thresholds meet the challenges of individual patients. METHODS: We evaluated microvascular flow index (MFI) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) in the sublingual microcirculation with CytoCam-IDF microscopy and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). A study team-independent, treating intensivist assigned a total of 64 patients to 1 of 2 two transfusion thresholds, 43 patients to the Hb 75 g/l threshold and 21 patients to the Hb 90 g/l threshold, at a surgical intensive care unit. We performed microcirculatory measurements 1 h before and 1 h after transfusion of 1 unit of red blood cells. RESULTS: Microcirculatory flow variables correlated negatively with pre-transfusion flow variables (ΔMFI: ρ = - 0.821, p <  0.001; ΔPPV: ρ = - 0.778, p <  0.001). Patients with good initial microcirculation (cutoffs: MFI > 2.84, PPV > 88%) showed a deteriorated microcirculation after red blood cell transfusion. An impaired microcirculation improved after transfusion. At both transfusion thresholds, approximately one third of the patients showed an initially impaired microcirculation. In contrast, one third in every group had good microcirculation above the cutoff variables and did not profit from the transfusion. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the established transfusion thresholds and other hemodynamic variables do not reflect microcirculatory perfusion of patients. Blood transfusion at both thresholds 75 g/l and 90 g/l hemoglobin can either improve or harm the microcirculatory blood flow, questioning the concept of arbitrary transfusion thresholds.

Sublingual microcirculation: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Sublingual microcirculation monitoring is suitable for bedside use in critically ill patients. We present a case in which severely impaired sublingual microcirculation was the first alarming sign of an early deterioration of the patient's medical situation. CASE PRESENTATION: This is the case of a 58-year-old white woman admitted to our intensive care unit after the removal of parts of her small intestine due to a volvulus. Her microcirculation was checked the day after surgery in terms of an ongoing study and predicted a massive deterioration of her clinical situation. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the potential value of monitoring the microcirculation in critically ill patients. Two full hours could have been saved for diagnostic workup and earlier treatment had we considered the impaired microcirculation alone as a warning sign. Regardless of the supposed cause, impaired microcirculation should alert the responsible physician and should be followed by a diagnostic workup. Sublingual microcirculation monitoring can be useful in intensive care units to detect a deteriorated microcirculation earlier than with standard monitoring.

Emergency response to out-of-hospital status epilepticus: A 10-year observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the implications of first responses of emergency medical services (EMS) to out-of-hospital status epilepticus (SE) on outcome. METHODS: From 2005 to 2014, prehospital and in-hospital data were assessed in consecutive adults admitted to an academic medical center with out-of-hospital SE. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables with a robust association between missed epileptic events by the EMS and no recovery to functional baseline in survivors. RESULTS: Among 213 SE patients, 150 were admitted via EMS. While nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) was missed by the EMS in 63.7%, convulsive SE (CSE) was not missed except in 4 patients with transformation into subtle SE. Missed NCSE was more likely with older age (odds ratio [OR]per year 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.10, p = 0.003) and no seizure history (OR 6.64, 95% CI 2.43-18.1, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of missed NCSE by these variables was 0.839. Independent predictors for not receiving benzodiazepines were increasing age (ORper year 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.008) and higher Glasgow Coma Scale score (ORper increasing unit 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, p = 0.001). Missed NCSE was independently associated with increased odds for no return to functional baseline in survivors (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.22-11.98, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients admitted with out-of-hospital SE, CSE is mostly recognized while NCSE is frequently missed especially in patients with increasing age and no seizure history. This calls for heightened awareness for out-of-hospital NCSE in such patients, as missed NCSE is associated with lack of treatment and less recovery to functional baseline in survivors independent of established outcome predictors.