Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(11)2024 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892937

RESUMO

Background/Objectives: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the preferred treatment for ampullary tumors because it has fewer side effects than surgical removal. This study retrospectively compared a new anchoring EP method (A-EP) with the conventional (C-EP) approach. Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent EP at a single medical institution between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, the indications for EP were pathological adenoma with <10 mm of biliary invasion and a tumor diameter <30 mm on endoscopic ultrasonography. The exclusion criteria were antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, previous upper GI surgery, or prior biliary/pancreatic endoscopic therapy. One expert endoscopist performed the two types of EPs, A-EP and C-EP. Results: Sixty-two patients underwent A-EP, and 37 underwent C-EP. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, tumor size, and ductal invasion on endoscopic ultrasound. The A-EP group had higher en bloc resection rates (95.2% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.010). Although the difference was not statistically significant, it tended towards fewer incidences of pancreatitis (p = 0.081) and duct stricture (p = 0.081). The recurrence rate was lower in the A-EP group (8.1% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.000). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the follow-up period (A-EP vs. C-EP, 725 vs. 1045 days, p = 0.109) or the days of recurrence (A-EP vs. C-EP, 341 vs. 562 days, p = 0.551). Conclusions: A-EP showed better outcomes than C-EP in terms of en bloc resection and recurrence rates, providing evidence for the efficacy of this novel EP method.

2.
World J Clin Cases ; 11(35): 8416-8424, 2023 Dec 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130626

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that is most commonly found in the pleura but can also originate from non-pleural sites. Among the non-pleural localizations, the pancreas is extremely rare. In particular, metastasis to the pancreas from the central nervous system (CNS) is extremely rare, with only two cases reported so far. We report a case of recurrence in the pancreas 14 years after the initial complete surgical removal of a tumor in the CNS. CASE SUMMARY: A 68-year-old man with a past medical history of recurrent meningeal hemangiopericytoma, currently referred to as SFT, presented to the hospital with jaundice. The patient was first diagnosed with an 8cm-sized meningeal hemangiopericytoma fourteen years ago and underwent osteoplastic craniotomy. After 16 mo, imaging showed recurrence and he underwent gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). 2 years later, imaging showed recurrence again leading to a second GKRS. 5 years later, recurrence was again suspected leading to a second craniotomy. Since then 3 years had passed, and imaging showed a 3.5cm-sized mass lesion on the pancreatic head with obstruction of the pancreatic and bile ducts. Endosonography with fine-needle aspiration biopsy was done preoperatively and aided in the diagnosis of SFT. The patient underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathologic findings of the resected pancreatic specimen, consistent with the previously resected brain specimen, confirmed the diagnosis of SFT. CONCLUSION: The rarity and lack of knowledge about SFTs make suspecting and diagnosing this disease challenging. We believe that a report of metastatic pancreatic SFT from the CNS will contribute to a better understanding of this rare disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA