RESUMO
AIMS: In the present study, we aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment on intraocular pressure (IOP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with and without pseudoexfoliation (PEX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients, 12 with PEX (12 eyes) and 12 without PEX (12 eyes), receiving IVR treatment for neovascular AMD between June 2017 and June 2019, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were composed of the history of glaucoma, uveitis, intravitreal steroid administration, pars plana vitrectomy surgery, and less than three IVR injections. Such criteria as age, gender, follow-up times, number of injections administered, IOP, and RNFL thickness before the first injection and one month after the last injection were also recorded. RESULTS: Age, gender, follow-up time, and the number of injections were similar in groups with and without PEX (p > 0.05). While mean post-treatment IOP values were not significantly higher in the PEX group (14.50 ± 3.06 vs. 12.91 ± 1.83 mmHg, p = 0.065), the values were significant for the non-PEX group (13.25 ± 2.76 vs. 11.83 ± 2.69 mmHg, p = 0.01), and these values were within normal IOP limits. Additionally, RNFL thickness was significantly thinner after treatment in both groups (91.41 ± 7.14 vs. 94.00 ± 6.76 in those with PEX; 95.58 ± 5.91 vs. 97.66 ± 6.89 in those without PEX; p < 0.05). The decrease in RNFL thickness in the PEX group was 2.58 ± 1.62 µ and in the non-PEX group was 2.08 ± 1.98 µ. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of RNFL thinning (p = 0.505). DISCUSSION: Ranibizumab may reduce RNFL thickness in patients with PEX. Longer-term studies including larger populations are necessary for understanding IOP and RNFL changes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the chronic topical medications affect aerobic conjunctival bacterial flora of patients with glaucoma and to compare their findings with the findings of the controls. METHODS: Eighty-one patients and 67 healthy control subjects participated in this case-control study. Duplicate conjunctival swab specimens were collected from each patient at the microbiology laboratory and were investigated for the presence of aerobic bacteria. All bacterial species from isolated colonies were identified. RESULTS: Thirty seven (45.7%) of the 81 patients and 25 (37.3%) of 67 controls had positive conjunctival cultures. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly isolated bacterial species in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the prevalence of other conjunctival cultures testing positive for any of the isolated organisms. The patients were also evaluated with respect to the presence of a systemic illness. Age, sex, presence of diabetes and asthma, duration of antiglaucomatous medication, and number of medications used did not have an effect on culture positivity in both groups when evaluated by logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The conjunctival culture positivity was higher in patients with glaucoma than in the healthy controls and in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes, although both were statistically insignificant. Aerobic conjunctival flora of the patients using topical glaucoma medications and the controls did not differ. Further studies are needed to comment on the clinical importance of these findings.