RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of a new clinical model to improve accessibility and expedite the pathway to molecular diagnosis for patients with suspected inherited retinal diseases (IRD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of electronic patient records. PARTICIPANTS: All patients referred to general medical genetic clinic between September 2017 to September 2019 and an ophthalmologist-led IRD clinic between October 2021 to July 2023 for suspected IRD were included. METHODS: The difference in timeliness and accessibility to diagnosis and genetics testing for patients referred for suspected IRDs were compared based on whether they were referred to general medical genetics clinic or an ophthalmologist-led IRD clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were time to consult from referral; time from initial consult to molecular diagnosis; and the time from initial consult to genetics result disclosure and counseling. Secondary outcomes included number of prior providers investigating the chief complaint; the proportion of patients undergoing genetics testing; and the range of diagnostic investigations undertaken. RESULTS: 473 patients were included, with 212 cases from general medical genetics clinic and 261 from medical retina clinic. The mean time from referral to initial consult was 14 months (±3.33 months) and 4 months (±3.4 months) for general medical genetics and the ophthalmologist-led IRD clinic respectively. The mean time from initial consult to genetics disclosure and counselling was 6 months (±3.6 months) and 3.5 months (±1.8 months) for medical genetics and the ophthalmologist-led model respectively. The total time from initial referral to genetics disclosure and counselling for the medical geneticist-led clinic model was 20-24 months. The total time from initial referral to genetics disclosure and counselling for ophthalmologist-led retinal clinic was 5-8 months. The average number of prior providers seen prior to presenting to ophthalmologist-led retina clinic was 2.05 (range 1-10). CONCLUSIONS: Shifting from the traditional medical genetics model to the new ophthalmologist-led IRD clinical model may improve accessibility and expedite the pathway to molecular diagnosis and subsequent gene therapy trials for patients with suspected IRDs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness may reflect cerebral status. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the relationship between RNFL thickness and incident all-cause dementia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) Eye Study. METHODS: Glaucoma detection with variable corneal compensation (GDx-VCC) and Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II) derived global mean RNFL thickness from dementia-free participants at baseline within the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study were analyzed. Incident dementia was identified through linkage to electronic medical records. Cox proportional hazard mixed-effects regression models adjusted for key confounders were used to examine the associations between RNFL thickness and incident dementia in four separate models. RESULTS: 6,239 participants were included with 322 cases of incident dementia and mean age of 67.5-years old, with 49.7% women (median follow-up 13.2-years, interquartile range (11.7 to 14.6 years). Greater RNFL thickness (GDx-VCC) was not significantly associated with a lower risk of incident dementia in the full adjusted model [HR per quartile increase 0.95; 95% CI 0.82-1.10]. Similarly, RNFL thickness assessed with HRT II was also not associated with incident dementia in any model (full adjusted model; HR per quartile increase: 1.06; [95% CI 0.93-1.19]. Gender did not modify any associations under study. CONCLUSION: GDx-VCC and HRT II derived RNFL thickness are unlikely to be useful predictors of incident dementia. Higher resolution optical imaging technologies may clarify whether there are useful relationships between neuro-retinal morphology and brain measures.