Leukocyte counts and ratios as potential predictors of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective cohort study.

Leukocyte counts and ratios are independent biomarkers to determine the severity and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In AIS, the connection between leukocytes and large vessel occlusion (LVO) is uncertain. This study aims to determine the relationship between the existence of LVO and leukocyte counts and ratios on admission to AIS. Patients were retrospectively evaluated within six hours of AIS starting between January 2019 and April 2023. On admission, blood specimens were collected, and leukocyte subtype counts were promptly analyzed. Computed tomography or digital subtraction angiography were utilized to verify the existence of LVO. Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to investigate the connections between the counts and ratios of leukocytes and the existence of LVO, as well as the discriminatory ability of these variables in predicting LVO. Total white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were substantially higher in the LVO existence group compared to the LVO absence group, whereas the ratio of eosinophils to neutrophils (ENR × 102) was lower (P < .001, respectively). Significant associations were observed between total WBC counts, neutrophil counts, NLR, and ENR × 102 and the existence of LVO (P < .001, respectively). Total WBC counts, neutrophil counts, NLR, and ENR × 102 had respective areas under the curves (AUC) of 0.730, 0.748, 0.704, and 0.680 for identifying LVO. Our results show that in AIS patients, the existence of LVO is independently associated with elevated total WBC and neutrophil counts, high NLR, and low ENR × 102 levels. Neutrophil and total WBC counts, as well as NLR and levels of ENR × 102, may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting LVO. Neuroinflammation, based on the existence of LVO, should be given particular attention in future investigations.

Immunogenicity and safety of ebolavirus vaccines in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This review aimed to systematically evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the candidate Ebola virus vaccine (EVV). METHODS: We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of EVV on healthy adults. The primary outcomes were relative risk (RR) of sero-conversion or sero-response of EVV in healthy adults between the groups that received EVV and the controls. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (n = 23573) were included. There was a significant difference in RR of sero-conversion of EVV (RR 13.18; 95% CI 11.28-15.41; I2 = 33%; P < 0.01) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in RR of adverse events (AEs) of EVV (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.27-1.74; I2 = 88%; P < 0.01), although no difference in RR of serious AE (SAE) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in RR of AEs for DNAEBO, EBOV-GP, MVA, and rVSVN4CT1 vaccines, compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The DNAEBO, EBOV-GP, MVA, and rVSVN4CT1 vaccines are likely to be safe and immunogenic, tending to support the vaccination against Ebola disease. These findings should provide much-needed evidence for public health policy makers to develop preventive measures based on disease prevalence features and socio-economic conditions.

Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Escitalopram is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and one of the most commonly prescribed newer antidepressants (ADs) worldwide. We aimed to explore the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with other ADs in the acute-phase treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to July 10, 2023. Trial databases of drug-approving agencies were hand-searched for published, unpublished and ongoing controlled trials. All randomized controlled trials comparing escitalopram against any other antidepressant for patients with MDD. Responders and remitters to treatment were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For dichotomous data, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data were analyzed using standardized mean differences (with 95% CI) using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies were included in this meta­analysis, among which sixteen trials compared escitalopram with another SSRI and 14 compared escitalopram with a newer AD. Escitalopram was shown to be significantly more effective than citalopram in achieving acute response (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.87). Escitalopram was also more effective than citalopram in terms of remission (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram was superior to other ADs for the acute phase treatment of MDD in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. However, no significant difference was found between escitalopram and other ADs in early response or follow-up response to treatment of MDD.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of basilar artery occlusion presenting with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity as the initial manifestation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) has been linked to a worse clinical prognosis in patients with traumatic brain injury. We aimed to identify the risk factors and clinical features associated with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) presenting with PSH as the first clinical presentation. METHODS: This study recruited patients with acute BAO who received endovascular therapy (EVT) at two stroke centers in China. PSH Assessment Measure ≥8 was included in the PSH+ group, while those with a score below 8 were classified as the PSH- group. Clinical data and radiological findings were compared between the two groups. A binary logistic regression model was employed to identify independent risk factors for PSH. RESULTS: 101 participants were enrolled, of whom 19 (18.8%) presented with PSH as the initial manifestation of BAO. Worse prognosis (modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6) at day 90 occurred in 14 (73.7%) of the PSH+ patients and 42 (51.2%) of the PSH- patients (P=0.076). The 90-day mortality rate was higher in the PSH+ group with 12 (63.2%) participants, compared with 31 (37.8%) participants in the PSH- group (P=0.044). A significantly increased risk of PSH was found in patients with midbrain involvement (OR 6.53, 95% CI 1.56 to 27.30, P=0.01) and a high baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.31, P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BAO presenting with PSH as the initial clinical manifestation experience a higher risk of 90-day mortality, despite undergoing EVT. Midbrain infarction and baseline NIHSS score may be significant risk factors for PSH following BAO.

Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Presenting as Symmetric Lesions in the Internal Capsule on Imaging Studies: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) leading to oedema, primarily in the internal capsule, are extremely rare and, to our knowledge, have never been reported. We reported a case of DAVFs with oedema in bilateral internal capsule oedema and reviewed the literature. METHODS: The report describes a unique imaging presentation of cases of DAVFs as symmetric lesions, mainly in the bilateral internal capsule. It also reviews the literature for symmetric lesions in the internal capsule and central grey matter caused by DAVFs to further characterize this rare entity and differential diagnosis through imaging features. RESULTS: In cases of symmetric oedema caused by DAVFs, the most common artery involved in arterial supply was the middle meningeal artery (13/24; 54%). The main vein involved in the drainage was the Galen vein (18/29; 62%). Most cases were treated with transarterial embolization (23/29; 79%), and the probability of effective treatment or complete cure is 100%. On imaging, the vasogenic oedema signal caused by DAVFs is a symmetrical lesion of the bilateral internal capsule, that is, DWI MRI shows a high signal in the unrestricted diffusion area on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. CONCLUSIONS: MR has good diagnostic value in abnormal basal ganglia symmetric signals caused by DAVFs, and can quickly identify DAVFs early.

Computed Tomography Findings in Hyperacute Spontaneous Midbrain Hemorrhage.

This case report describes the computed tomography (CT) characteristic findings and evolution of a hyperacute spontaneous midbrain hemorrhage.

Biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents versus contemporary drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta­analysis.

In spite of similar efficacy and safety in pilot studies, compared with the contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stent (DP-DES), the bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) may be more superior in promoting blood vessel healing. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting BP-DES (BP-EES) with contemporary DP-DES through a meta-analysis. We performed this meta-analysis to provide further evidence of the safety and efficacy of BP-EES. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing clinical efficacy and safety of BP-EES versus contemporary DP-DES. Fifteen RCTs with a total of 15,572 patients were selected. The rate of MACE was 9.4% in patients receiving BP-EES and 7.3% receiving DP-EES (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29, p = 0.05; I2 = 46%). TLF and MI were also similar in both groups. Based on the available data, this review demonstrates that BP-EES displays a clinically comparable efficacy and safety profile to that of contemporary DP-DES at years of follow-up in patients undergoing PCI.

Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol administration versus intravaginal misoprostol administration-only for cervical ripening. The Medline, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched systematically. Randomized controlled trials that included patients with a singleton viable fetus who underwent induction of labor that required cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop ≤ 6) were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes was time to delivery and rate of cesarean delivery. Thirteen trials with 2978 subjects met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in the incidence of cesarean delivery between the two groups (RR, 0.90; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.14; I2 = 69 %). The combination group resulted in comparable time to delivery (MD -2.50 h; 95 % CI 0.38, -5.38; I2 = 97 %), shorter time to vaginal delivery (MD -3.49 h; 95 % CI -4.89, -2.09; I2 = 81 %), lower risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.58-0.90, I2 = 0 %), meconium-stained fluid (RR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.31-0.73, I2 = 28 %), and tachysystole with fetal heart trace changes (RR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27-0.86, I2 = 43 %), compared with intravaginal misoprostol-only group. There was no statistical difference in rates of terbutaline use, endometritis or chorioamnionitis between the two groups. The combination of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening is not associated with shorter time to delivery. However, the combination group shows significant difference in shorter time to vaginal delivery, NICU admission, meconium-stained fluid, and tachysystole with fetal heart trace changes.

Immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Available data show that COVID-19 vaccines may be less effective in people living with HIV (PLWH) who are at increased risk for severe COVID-19. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in PLWH with healthy individuals. METHODS: Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Risk ratios of seroconversion were separately pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and a systematic review without meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer levels was performed after the first and second doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 6522 subjects met the inclusion criteria. After the first vaccine dose, seroconversion in PLWH was comparable to that in healthy individuals. After a second dose, seroconversion was slightly lower in PLWH compared with healthy controls, and antibody titers did not seem to be significantly affected or reduced among participants of both groups. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines show favorable immunogenicity and efficacy in PLWH. A second dose is associated with consistently improved seroconversion, although it is slightly lower in PLWH than in healthy individuals. Additional strategies, such as a booster vaccination with messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines, might improve seroprotection for these patients.

Seroconversion rate after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with solid cancer have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the currently available evidence about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid cancer. We included prospective studies comparing the immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines between patients with solid cancer and healthy individuals. Relative risks of seroconversion after the first and second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were separately pooled with the use of random effects meta-analysis. Thirty studies with 11,245 subjects met the inclusion criteria. After first vaccine dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer vs healthy individuals was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.78, I2 = 94%). After a second dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer vs healthy controls was 0.87 (0.86-0.88, I2 = 87%). Our review suggests that, compared with healthy individuals, COVID-19 vaccines show favorable immunogenicity and efficacy in patients with solid cancer. A second dose is associated with significantly improved seroconversion, although it is slightly lower in patients with solid cancer compared with healthy individuals.

Adalimumab for induction of remission in patients with Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: A large number of people with Crohn's disease (CD) fail to recover from conventional therapy or biological therapy. Some studies showed that adalimumab (ADA) may be an effective alternative therapy for these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADA in inducing CD remission. METHODS: We performed search of Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register, and several other databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any dose of ADA with controls (placebo or active) in participants with active CD were included. The primary outcome was the failure to achieve clinical response/remission at 4 weeks. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Review Manager Software v5.3 was used. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included (n = 919), in which 553 participants received ADA and 366 participants received placebo. A meta-analysis of four studies showed that at 4 weeks, there were more people in the ADA group with clinical response/remission or symptom improvement compared with the placebo group. The rates of side effects, serious side effects, and study withdrawals due to side effects were lower in ADA participants than placebo ones. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that ADA is superior to placebo in induction of clinical response/remission of CD patients, but no firm conclusions can be drawn on the safety of ADA in CD due to the low number of events.