Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for uremic pruritus - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Uremic pruritus (UP) is one of the most bothersome symptoms among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The pathophysiology of UP remains elusive, resulting in limited treatment options. The inability of standard medical treatments to provide effective relief has piqued interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) summarizing the efficacy and safety profile of CAM used for UP in CKD patients was performed. CAM interventions were classified using categories proposed by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. The efficacy of each CAM was determined from changes in UP severity and all reported adverse effects were extracted. RESULTS: Of 5242 articles screened, 34 RCTs were included, with 15 (44.1 %) studies having a sample size greater than 50. The studies considered 21 treatments including omega-3 fatty acid supplementation (n=5), acupuncture (n=5), topical capsaicin (n=4) and acupressure (n=3). Acupuncture, acupressure and topical capsaicin were shown to be effective in improving uremic pruritus. Interventions which include oral omega-3 fatty acid and zinc supplementation demonstrated mixed efficacy. Other therapies such as evening primrose oil, turmeric, vitamin B3, vitamin D and thermal therapy were not effective for treatment of UP. Common adverse effects reported with topical capsaicin included mild burning sensations (50.0-88.2 %) or erythema (6.7-22.7%) while that of acupuncture included soreness (7.5 %), bleeding (6.0-7.5%) and hematoma (1.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture, acupressure and topical capsaicin have the largest body of evidence for efficacy in the treatment of UP. Larger and higher quality RCTs are required to examine the efficacy and safety of promising CAM.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) for Fatigue Worsening in Asian Breast Cancer Patients.

CONTEXT: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF), a questionnaire that measures cancer-related fatigue, has not been established in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the MCID of the MFSI-SF. METHODS: Breast cancer patients completed the MFSI-SF and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) before chemotherapy and at least three weeks later. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 fatigue scale (EORTC-FA) was used as an anchor, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also used to identify the optimal MCID cut-off for fatigue deterioration. A distribution-based approach used one-third of the SD, half of the SD, and one SEM of the total MFSI-SF score to determine the MCID. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were analyzed. Change scores of the MFSI-SF and EORTC-FA were moderately correlated (r = 0.47, P < 0.001). The EORTC-FA-anchored MCID was 8.69 points (95% CI: 4.03-13.34). The MCID attained from the ROC curve method was 4.50 points (sensitivity: 68.8%; specificity: 64.1%). For the distribution-based approach, the MCIDs corresponding to one-third of the SD, half of the SD, and one SEM were 5.39, 8.99, and 10.79 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MCID of the MFSI-SF identified by all approaches ranged from 4.50 to 10.79 points. The MCID can be used to interpret the clinical significance of fatigue deterioration in patients with breast cancer and to determine sample sizes for future clinical trials.