Treatment of apathy in Parkinson's disease: A bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background: Apathy is an important but unrecognised aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). The optimal therapeutic options for apathy remain unclear. Early recognition and treatment of apathy can reduce the significant burden of disease for patients and their caregivers. Here we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different treatment modalities of apathy in PD (CRD42021292099). Methods: We screened Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for articles on therapies for apathy in PD. The outcome of interest is the reduction in apathy scores post-intervention and is measured by standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We included only randomised controlled trials examining interventions targeted at reducing apathy. Results: Nineteen studies involving 2372 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis found pharmacotherapy to be the most efficacious treatment, significantly better than brain stimulation (SMD -0.43, 95% CrI -0.78 to -0.07), exercise-based interventions (SMD -0.66, 95% CrI -1.25 to -0.08), supplements (SMD -0.33, 95% CrI -0.67 to 0), and placebo (SMD -0.38, 95% CrI -0.56 to -0.23). Subgroup analysis of pharmacotherapy versus placebo found similar efficacy of dopamine agonists (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.12, P = 0.003) and alternative medications (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.23, P < 0.001). The remaining comparisons and subgroup analyses did not demonstrate any significant treatment effects. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials showed that pharmacotherapy is the most efficacious treatment option, with dopamine agonists having similar efficacy as other medications. Further research is needed to determine the optimal management strategy.

Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is routinely treated with spinal decompression surgery, with an increasing trend towards minimally invasive techniques. Endoscopic decompression has emerged as a technique which minimizes approach-related morbidity while achieving similar clinical outcomes to conventional open or microscopic approaches. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic decompression for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review on randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing endoscopic versus microscopic decompression was conducted, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Treatment effects were computed using pairwise random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials respectively. Quality of the overall body of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: A total of 19 primary references comprising 1,997 patients and 2,132 spinal levels were included. Endoscopic decompression was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood-loss (weighted mean differences [WMD]=-33.29 mL, 95% CI:-51.80 to -14.78, p=.0032), shorter duration of hospital stay (WMD=-1.79 days, 95% CI: -2.63 to 0.95, p=.001), rates of incidental durotomy (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.91, p=.0184) and surgical site infections (RR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.10 to-0.51, p=.001), and a nonsignificant trend towards less back pain, leg pain, and better functional outcomes compared to its microscopic counterpart up to 2-year follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and microscopic decompression are safe and effective techniques for treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Prospective studies of larger power considering medium to long-term outcomes and rates of iatrogenic instability are warranted to compare potential alignment changes and destabilization from either techniques.

Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) are at risk of future cardiovascular (CV) events. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify their risk of future CV events. We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from inception until January 31, 2023 for relevant articles using a combination of keywords and medical subject headings. Studies examining CV outcomes in patients with HM versus controls without HM were included. The outcomes of interest included acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and stroke. The outcomes were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study is registered with PROSPERO at CRD42022307814. A total of 15 studies involving 1,960,144 cases (178,602 patients with HM and 1,781,212 controls) were included in the quantitative analysis. A total of 10 studies examined the risk of AMI, 5 examined HF, and 11 examined stroke. Compared with the control group, the HRs for HM for AMI, HF, and stroke were 1.65 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.09, p <0.001), 4.82 (95% CI 3.72 to 6.25, p <0.001), and 1.60 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.97, p <0.001), respectively. The sensitivity analysis of stroke risk based on lymphoma type showed an increased risk of stroke in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma compared with controls (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.64, p = 0.03) but no significant difference for Hodgkin lymphoma (HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.23, p = 0.08). Patients with HM are at increased risk of future AMI, HF, and stroke, and these findings suggest that CV care of patients with HM should be considered as a growing priority.

Risk of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Suicide risk may be increased in patients with Parkinson disease (PD), a common neurodegenerative condition. Mood disorders, especially depression, are prevalent in patients with PD who report suicidality. Objective: To address inconsistent results from studies of suicidal ideation and behavior in patients with PD. Data Sources: The study team searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to June 14, 2023, and further screened the bibliographies of relevant studies to ensure a comprehensive search. Study Selection: Original studies, published in English, discussing either suicidal ideation, behavior, or both in adults with PD were included. Accepted study designs included cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies. Studies that only included patients with PD after deep brain stimulation were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This meta-analysis was conducted in line with the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors reviewed each study and extracted the data independently, with discrepancies referred to a third independent author. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behavior, measured as proportions, and the risk of suicidal behavior in patients with PD relative to controls, measured in both odds ratio (OR) and hazards ratio (HR). Results: A total of 28 studies comprising 505 950 PD patients were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was evaluated in 14 studies (22.2%; 95% CI, 14.6-32.3) and suicidal behavior in 21 studies (1.25%; 95% CI, 0.64-2.41). Excluding 4 outliers, prevalence of suicidal behavior was significantly higher in prospective studies (1.75%; 95% CI, 1.03-2.95) than retrospective studies (0.50%; 95% CI, 0.24-1.01). Excluding 1 outlier, OR of suicidal behavior was pooled across 10 studies and significant (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.22-3.78; P = .01). HR of suicidal behavior was assessed in 9 studies (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.40-2.14; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis involving more than 500 000 patients with PD found 22.2% and 1.25% of patients with PD to have suicidal ideation and behavior, respectively. Patients with PD had 2 times the risk of suicidal behavior than controls. Early recognition and management of suicidality in PD can help reduce mortality.

The association between cancer diagnosis, care, and outcomes in 1 million patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical care provided to cancer patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary embolism (PE), as well as the association between type of cancer, in-hospital care, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This study examined the in-hospital care (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, and surgical thrombectomy/embolectomy) and clinical outcomes (mortality, major bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke) among adults hospitalized due to acute PE between October 2015 to December 2018 using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Of 1,090,130 hospital records included in the analysis, 216,825 (19.9%) had current cancer diagnoses, including lung (4.7%), hematological (2.5%), colorectal (1.6%), breast (1.3%), prostate (0.8%), and 'other' cancer (9.0%). Cancer patients had lower adjusted odds of receiving systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, and surgical thrombectomy/embolectomy compared with their non-cancer counterparts (P < 0.001), except for systemic thrombolysis (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.09, P = 0.553) and catheter-directed therapy (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.00, P = 0.053) for prostate cancer. Cancer patients had greater odds of mortality (P < 0.05). Lung cancer patients had the highest odds of mortality (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 2.61-2.76, P < 0.001) and hemorrhagic stroke (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.61-1.90, P < 0.001), while colorectal cancer patients had the greatest odds of bleeding (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.94-2.15, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among those hospitalized for PE, cancer diagnoses were associated with lower odds of invasive management and poorer in-hospital outcomes, with metastatic status being an especially important determinant. Appropriateness of care could not be assessed in this study.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis of 13,878 patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical, neuropsychological, and socioeconomic factors affecting Parkinson's disease (PD) during COVID-19 pandemic across different populations have not been systematically studied. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis of factors that impact the well-being of PD patients during the pandemic. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for articles published between 2020 and 2022. We conducted random-effects pooling of estimates and meta-regression. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies involving 13,878 patients from America, Europe, Asia, and Africa were included. There is a high prevalence of decreased physical activity and exercise, and worsening motor and neuropsychiatric symptoms (17-56%). Patients in lower-income countries more frequently reported worsening anxiety (adjusted OR [aOR] 8.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-49.28, p = 0.012), sleep (aOR 5.16, 95% CI 1.15-23.17, p = 0.032), and PD symptoms (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 0.96-13.34, p = 0.058). Lockdown was associated with decreased exercise levels (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.78, p = 0.025) and worsening mood (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95, p = 0.035). Younger age correlated with decreased physical activity (ß -0.30, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.07, p = 0.012), exercise (ß -0.11, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.07, p < 0.001), worsening PD symptoms (ß -0.08, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.01, p = 0.018), and sleep (ß -0.14, 95% CI -0.27 to 0, p = 0.044). Female PD patients reported a greater decrease in physical activity (ß 11.94, 95% CI 2.17-21.71, p = 0.017) and worse sleep (ß 10.76, 95% CI 2.81-18.70, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This large meta-analysis of PD patients in diverse populations identified a high prevalence of physical and mental worsening during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients in lower-income countries being exceptionally vulnerable.

Non-invasive electrical stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are limited treatment options for patients with neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity. Non-invasive electrostimulation (NES) is receiving increasing interest because of its ease of implementation, cost-effectiveness and safety. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of NES. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were screened for studies using NES in ataxias and spasticity. Key outcome measurements of effectiveness included changes in (1) Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores, (2) cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), (3) the nine-hole peg test (9HPT), (4) the 8-m walking time (8MWT), (5) International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) score and (6) the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scores. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials involving 203 patients were included. There were significant improvements in MAS (mean difference [MD] -0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.76 to -0.08, p = 0.015), CBI (MD -0.35%, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.28, p < 0.001), 8MWT (MD -1.88 s, 95% CI -3.26 to -0.49, p = 0.008), ICARS (MD -7.84, 95% CI -11.90 to -3.78, p < 0.001) and SARA (MD -3.01, 95% CI -4.74 to -1.28, p < 0.001). There was almost no heterogeneity across all outcomes except for CBI (I2  = 79%). No significant changes in the 9HPT were observed comparing NES to a sham procedure (MD -3.52 s, 95% CI -9.15 to 2.10, p = 0.220). Most included studies were at low risk of bias, and no severe adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that NES is an effective treatment for improving coordination and balance and increased exercise capacity in patients with ataxia and spasticity. There was also a significant modulation of CBI in ataxic patients.