High rate of stone-related complications after stapling the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-an underrecognized risk.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic staplers (LS) have been suggested as a safe alternative to metal clips in laparoscopic cholecystectomy when the cystic duct is too inflamed or wide for complete clip occlusion. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of patients whose cystic ducts were controlled by LS and evaluate the risk factors for complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with LS used to control the cystic duct from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Patients were excluded for open cholecystectomy, partial cholecystectomy, or cancer. Potential risk factors for complications were assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 262 patients, 191 (72.9%) were stapled for size and 71 (27.1%) for inflammation. In total, 33 (16.3%) patients had Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, with no significant difference when surgeons chose to staple for duct size versus inflammation (p = 0.416). Seven patients had bile duct injury. A large proportion had Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 postoperative complications specifically related to bile duct stones [n = 29 (11.07%)]. Intraoperative cholangiogram was protective against postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.18 (p = 0.022)]. CONCLUSION: Whether these high complication rates reflect a technical issue with stapling, more challenging anatomy, or worse disease, findings question whether the use of LS during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is truly a safe alternative to the already accepted methods of cystic duct ligation and transection. Based on these findings, an intraoperative cholangiogram should be performed when considering a linear stapler during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to: (1) ensure the biliary tree is free of stones; (2) prevent inadvertent transection of the infundibulum rather than the cystic duct; and, (3) allow opportunity for safe alternative strategies when an IOC is not able to confirm anatomy. Otherwise, surgeons employing LS devices should be aware that patients are at higher risk for complications.

Sarcopenia in high acuity liver transplantation: Does it predict outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia has gained momentum as a potential risk-stratification tool in liver transplantation (LT). While LT recipients recently have more advanced end-stage liver disease, the impact of sarcopenia in high acuity recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed sarcopenia by calculating skeletal muscle index (SMI) from cross-sectional area at third lumbar vertebra (cm2 ) and height (m2 ) in 296 patients with a CT ≤ 30 days prior to LT. Sex-specific SMI cut-offs were developed, and its impact was assessed in patients with MELD ≥ 35. RESULTS: In patients with MELD ≥ 35 (n = 217), men with a SMI < 30 cm2 /m2 had significantly higher rates of bacteremia (P = .021) and a longer hospital stay (P < .001). Women with a SMI < 34 cm2 /m2 had a longer hospital stay (P = .032). There were no relationships between SMI and survival in men and women with MELD ≥ 35. CONCLUSIONS: This series examined sarcopenia with a focus on high MELD patients. Although decreased SMI contributed to higher post-LT hospital stay, it did not impact patient survival, suggesting that while SMI alone may not aid in patient selection for LT, it certainly may guide perioperative care-planning in this challenging patient population.

The Utility of Extended Criteria Donor Livers in High Acuity Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver allografts has gained momentum as a potential method by which to expand the donor pool, their use largely remains relegated to low acuity liver transplant (LT) recipients. Thus, we sought to examine whether such grafts also have utility in high acuity (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] ≥ 35) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Extended criteria donors were defined as donor age > 60 years, hepatitis C virus positive donor, split livers, livers with cold ischemia time > 12 h, donor after cardiac death livers, or having macrosteatosis > 30%. Outcomes were compared between standard liver (SL) and ECD grafts in recipients with MELD ≥ 35. RESULTS: Of 225 patients, 46 (20.4%) received an ECD liver and 179 (79.6%) received a SL. Extended criteria donor graft recipients had significantly higher levels of post-LT maximal transaminases and rate of early allograft dysfunction. Nonetheless, high acuity ECD graft recipients had similar short- and long-term patient survival compared to SL recipients, with 1-,3-, and 5-year survivals of 86.9%, 82.3%, 79.3% and 86.9%, 80.5%, and 75.4%, respectively (P = .674). There were also no significant differences in graft survival or rejection-free survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The lack of inferior patient/graft survival among high acuity ECD graft recipients suggests that ECD livers present a viable method by which to expand the donor pool for this group of patients.

The impact of marijuana use on liver transplant recipients: A 900 patient single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Increased societal prevalence of marijuana continues to challenge liver transplant (LT) programs. This study aimed to examine the potential effects of marijuana use on outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included recipients who underwent LT between 1/2012 and 6/2018. According to pre-LT marijuana use, patients were classified into recent (≤6 months of LT), former (chronic use but not ≤6 months), or non-users. Additionally, the impact of post-LT marijuana use on survival was assessed. RESULTS: Of 926 eligible patients, 184 were pre-LT marijuana users (42 recent; 142 former) (median follow-up: 30.3 months). Pre-users were more likely to be male, White, and have histories of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use. Additionally, recent users were of higher acuity, with higher MELD and requiring ICU admission. Patient survival at 1-year was 89% in non-users, 94% (HR: 0.494, 95% CI: 0.239-1.022 vs. non-users) in former users, and 83% (HR: 1.516, 95% CI: 0.701-3.282) in recent users. Post-operative complications in pre-LT users and the survival analysis for post-LT marijuana users vs. non-users did not show significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that marijuana use did not have an adverse impact on post-LT outcomes; however, further studies utilizing larger cohorts are warranted.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury and its relationship with early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant patients.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is believed to contribute to graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT). However, studies on IRI and the impact of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in IRI grafts are limited. Histological IRI was graded in 506 grafts from patients who had undergone LT and classified based on IRI severity (no, minimal, mild, moderate, and severe). Of the 506 grafts, 87.4% had IRI (no: 12.6%, minimal: 38.1%, mild: 35.4%, moderate: 13.0%, and severe: 0.8%). IRI severity correlated with the incidence of EAD and graft survival at 6 months. Longer cold/warm ischemia time, recipient/donor hypertension, and having a male donor were identified as independent risk factors for moderate to severe IRI. Among 70 grafts with moderate to severe IRI, 42.9% of grafts developed EAD, and grafts with EAD had significantly inferior survival compared to grafts without EAD. Longer cold ischemia time and large droplet macrovesicular steatosis (≥20%) were identified as independent risk factors for EAD. Our study demonstrated that increased IRI severity was correlated with inferior short-term graft outcomes. Careful consideration of IRI risk factors during donor-recipient matching may assist in optimizing graft utilization and LT outcomes. Furthermore, identification of risk factors of IRI-associated EAD may guide patient management and possible timely graft replacement.

The Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery in a High-Acuity Liver Transplant Population.

BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon for liver transplant (LT) recipients to have had previous abdominal surgery (PAS) preceding transplant. The impact of PAS on morbidity and mortality in LT patients remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the correlation between PAS and LT outcomes in a high-acuity patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of 936 adult primary LT recipients between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided based on PAS history. PAS was subdivided into upper abdominal surgery (UAS) and lower abdominal surgery (LAS). UAS was separated into high-impact UAS and low-impact UAS. Finally, we studied patients with PAS ≤90 d versus PAS >90 d. RESULTS: Extensive adhesiolysis was the only significant perioperative factor between the PAS group (n = 367) and the non-PAS group (n = 569) (P < 0.001). Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (20U versus 17U, P = 0.044) and abdominal packing (24.2% versus 13.3%, P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the UAS group (n = 186) versus the LAS group (n = 181). Patients with high-impact UAS required greater RBC (P = 0.021) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.005), and arterial conduits (P = 0.016) during LT. Compared with recipients with PAS >90 d (n = 338), recipients with PAS ≤90 d (n = 29) had significantly higher RBC transfusion (P = 0.046), fresh frozen plasma transfusion (P = 0.022), and abdominal packing (P = 0.025). No differences in patient and graft survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, with appropriate care in the perioperative setting, PAS is not a contraindication to successful LT. Careful consideration is warranted when risk stratifying patients with multiple comorbidities who had PAS, especially those with UAS or PAS ≤90 d.

Impact of Rifaximin Therapy on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Intestinal microbiota is thought to play an important role in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) after liver transplantation (LT). Rifaximin, a nonabsorbable antibiotic used to treat encephalopathy, exhibits antibacterial activity within the gut. We report the first study examining the impact of pre-LT rifaximin use on reducing hepatic IRI and inflammatory cell infiltration after LT. This retrospective single-center study included adult LT recipients from January 2013 through June 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on duration of rifaximin use before LT: rifaximin group (≥28 days) and control group (none or <28 days). Patients receiving other antibiotics within 28 days of LT and re-LTs were excluded. Outcomes and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in the graft were compared by 1:1 propensity score-matching and multivariate analyses. On 1:1 matching (n = 39/group), rifaximin patients had lower postoperative serum transaminase levels and lower early allograft dysfunction (EAD; 10.3% versus 33.3%; P = 0.014). Of the matched patients, 8 patients (n = 4/group) had postreperfusion liver biopsies (approximately 2 hours after reperfusion) available for mRNA analysis. Hepatic expression of CD86 (macrophage marker) and cathepsin G (neutrophil marker) was significantly lower in rifaximin patients than controls (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis included 458 patients. Rifaximin treatment <28 days was identified as an independent risk factor EAD in all patients and those with high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (MELD ≥35; n = 230). In conclusion, the propensity score-matched and multivariate analyses suggest a therapeutic role of rifaximin in reducing EAD. Pre-LT rifaximin administration exerted a protective function against early liver injury, potentially by suppressing inflammatory cell activation in the graft.