RESUMO
Ethics consultations have been shown to reduce the use of "nonbeneficial treatments," defined as life-sustaining treatments delivered to patients who ultimately did not survive to hospital discharge, when treatment conflicts occurred in the adult intensive care unit (ICU). In this paper we estimated the costs of nonbeneficial treatment using the results from a randomized trial of ethics consultations. We found that ethics consultations were associated with reductions in hospital days and treatment costs among patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. We conclude that consultations resolved conflicts that would have inappropriately prolonged nonbeneficial or unwanted treatments in the ICU instead of focusing on more appropriate comfort care.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/economia , Consultoria Ética/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/economia , Futilidade Médica , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões , Dissidências e Disputas , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/ética , Tempo de Internação , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/ética , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
CONTEXT: Ethics consultations increasingly are being used to resolve conflicts about life-sustaining interventions, but few studies have reported their outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ethics consultations in the intensive care setting reduce the use of life-sustaining treatments delivered to patients who ultimately did not survive to hospital discharge, as well as the reactions to the consultations of physicians, nurses, and patients/surrogates. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial from November 2000 to December 2002. SETTING: Adult intensive care units (ICUs) of 7 US hospitals representing a spectrum of institutional characteristics. PATIENTS: Five hundred fifty-one patients in whom value-related treatment conflicts arose during the course of treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned either to an intervention (ethics consultation offered) (n = 278) or to usual care (n = 273). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were ICU days and life-sustaining treatments in those patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. We examined the same measures in those who did survive to discharge and also compared the overall mortality rates of the intervention and usual care groups. We also interviewed physicians and nurses and patients/surrogates about their views of the ethics consultation. RESULTS: The intervention and usual-care groups showed no difference in mortality. However, ethics consultations were associated with reductions in hospital (-2.95 days, P =.01) and ICU (-1.44 days, P =.03) days and life-sustaining treatments (-1.7 days with ventilation, P =.03) in those patients who ultimately did not survive to discharge. The majority (87%) of physicians, nurses, and patients/surrogates agreed that ethics consultations in the ICU were helpful in addressing treatment conflicts. CONCLUSION: Ethics consultations were useful in resolving conflicts that may have inappropriately prolonged nonbeneficial or unwanted treatments in the ICU.