Safety outcomes of antipsychotics classes in drug-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: Given the similar efficacies across antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia, understanding their safety profiles, particularly concerning receptor-binding differences, is crucial for optimal drug selection, especially for patients with first episode schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the safety outcomes of second-generation antipsychotics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with new user active comparator design using a nationwide claims database in South Korea. Participants were drug-naïve adult patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Three representative drugs with different pharmacologic profiles were compared: risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. Propensity scores were used to match the study groups, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed in various epidemiological settings. Seventeen safety outcomes, including neuropsychiatric, cardiometabolic and gastrointestinal events, were assessed, with upper-respiratory-tract infection as a negative control outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1044, 2078, and 3634 participants were matched for olanzapine vs. risperidone, olanzapine vs. aripiprazole, and risperidone vs. aripiprazole comparisons, respectively. For parkinsonism, there was a significant difference in outcomes between the risperidone and aripiprazole groups (HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.13-2.91]), with consistent sensitivity analysis results. There were no significant differences in other neuropsychiatry outcomes or in the risk of cardiometabolic and gastrointestinal outcomes between any of the comparative group pairs. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of drug-induced parkinsonism was significantly higher with risperidone than with aripiprazole. Although olanzapine is known for its metabolic risk, there were no significant differences in risk between the other pairs.

Scalable Infrastructure Supporting Reproducible Nationwide Healthcare Data Analysis toward FAIR Stewardship.

Transparent and FAIR disclosure of meta-information about healthcare data and infrastructure is essential but has not been well publicized. In this paper, we provide a transparent disclosure of the process of standardizing a common data model and developing a national data infrastructure using national claims data. We established an Observational Medical Outcome Partnership (OMOP) common data model database for national claims data of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of South Korea. To introduce a data openness policy, we built a distributed data analysis environment and released metadata based on the FAIR principle. A total of 10,098,730,241 claims and 56,579,726 patients' data were converted as OMOP common data model. We also built an analytics environment for distributed research and made the metadata publicly available. Disclosure of this infrastructure to researchers will help to eliminate information inequality and contribute to the generation of high-quality medical evidence.