The comparative experimental study of rehabilitation program decision for spinal cord injury based on electronic medical records.

Objective: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain patients' medical and health information. The Utilization of EMRs for assisted diagnosis is of significant importance for the rehabilitation of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Therefore, this study proposes a decision-making model for rehabilitation programs of SCI patients based on EMRs. Methods: First, an Electronic Medical Records (EMR) dataset comprising 1252 Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) patients was constructed, and data preprocessing was completed. Second, the Random Forest (RF) feature extraction algorithm was utilized to select case features with high contribution levels. Then, to address the imbalance issue in EMRs, a multi-label learning framework based on the improved MLSMOTE was adopted. Finally, seven multi-label classification models were employed to predict patients' physical therapy (PT) prescriptions. Results: The proposed improved MLSMOTE multi-label learning framework can solve the problem of class imbalance. Compared with the other six models, the CC model has improved significantly in many metrics. Its hamming loss and ranking loss were 0.1388 and 0.2467, and precision, recall, and F1-score were 83.33 %, 81.20 %, and 79.82 % respectively. Conclusions: The improved MLSMOTE multi-label learning framework proposed in this study can make full use of the information in EMRs and effectively improve the decision-making accuracy of rehabilitation treatment programs.

The Technology to Enhance Patient Motivation in Virtual Reality Rehabilitation: A Review.

Virtual reality (VR) technology has experienced a steady rise and has been widely applied in the field of rehabilitation. The integration of VR technology in rehabilitation has shown promising results in enhancing their motivation for treatment, thereby enabling patients to actively engage in rehab training. Despite the advancement, there is a dearth of comprehensive summary and analysis on the use of VR technology to enhance patient motivation in rehabilitation. Thus, this narrative review aims to evaluate the potential of VR technology in enhancing patient motivation during motor rehabilitation training. This review commences with an explanation of how enhancing motivation through the VR rehabilitation system could improve the efficiency and effectiveness of rehabilitation training. Then, the technology was analyzed to improve patient motivation in the present VR rehabilitation system in detail. Furthermore, these technologies are classified and summarized to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art approaches for enhancing patient motivation in VR rehabilitation. Findings showed VR rehabilitation training utilizes game-like exercises to enhance the engagement and enjoyment of rehabilitation training. By immersing patients in a simulated environment with multisensory feedback, VR systems offer a unique approach to rehabilitation that can lead to improved patient motivation. Both ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes, which is not typically achievable with traditional rehabilitation methods. The review concludes that VR rehabilitation presents an opportunity to improve patient motivation and adherence to long-term rehabilitation training. However, to further enhance patient self-efficacy, VR rehabilitation should integrate psychology and incorporate methods. Moreover, it is necessary to build a game design theory for rehabilitation games, and the latest VR feedback technology should also be introduced.

CFI: a VR motor rehabilitation serious game design framework integrating rehabilitation function and game design principles with an upper limb case.

Virtual reality (VR) Rehabilitation holds the potential to address the challenge that patients feel bored and give up long-term rehabilitation training. Despite the introduction of gaming elements by some researchers in rehabilitation training to enhance engagement, there remains a notable lack of in-depth research on VR rehabilitation serious game design methods, particularly the absence of a concrete design framework for VR rehabilitation serious games. Hence, we introduce the Clinical-Function-Interesting (CFI): a VR rehabilitation serious game design framework, harmonizing rehabilitation function and game design theories. The framework initiates with clinic information, defining game functions through the functional decomposition of rehabilitation training. Subsequently, it integrates gaming elements identified through the analysis and comparison of related literature to provide enduring support for long-term training. Furthermore, VR side-effect and enhancement are considered. Building upon this design framework, we have developed an upper limb VR rehabilitation serious game tailored for mild to moderate stroke patients and aligned our framework with another developed VR rehabilitation serious game to validate its practical feasibility. Overall, the proposed design framework offers a systematic VR rehabilitation serious game design methodology for the VR rehabilitation field, assisting developers in more accurately designing VR rehabilitation serious games that are tailored to specific rehabilitation goals.

A Method for Calculating Lower Extremity Anatomical Landmark Trajectories Based on Inertial Motion Capture Data.

Anatomical landmark trajectories are commonly used to define joint coordinate systems in human kinematic analysis according to standards proposed by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB). However, most inertial motion capture (IMC) studies focus only on joint angle measurement, which limits its application. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method to calculate the trajectories of anatomical landmarks based on IMC data. The accuracy and reliability of this method were investigated by comparative analysis based on measurement data from 16 volunteers. The results showed that the accuracy of anatomical landmark trajectories was 23.4 to 57.3 mm, about 5.9% to 7.6% of the segment length, the orientation accuracy was about 3.3° to 8.1°, less than 8.6% of the range of motion (ROM), using optical motion capture results as the gold standard. Furthermore, the accuracy of this method is are similar to that of Xsens MVN, a commercial IMC system. The results also show that the algorithm allows for more in-depth motion analysis based on IMC data, and the output format is more versatile.

Rotator cuff tear reaching the superior half portion of the humeral head causes shoulder abduction malfunction.

PURPOSE: To examine the biomechanical properties governing posterosuperior rotator cuff (RC) tear progression and dynamic shoulder abduction function, in the absence of excess loading. METHODS: Twelve freshly frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated via an established dynamic shoulder abduction stimulator. The shoulder abduction functions were primarily evaluated using subacromial contact pressure (SACP) during an abduction procedure, and subsequent middle deltoid force (MDF) under 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) anterior 1/3 posterosuperior rotator cuff (PSRC) tear, (3) anterior 2/3 PSRC tear, (4) entire PSRC tear, and (5) global RC tear (tear involving the entire superior RC). RESULTS: No obvious differences were observed in the peak MDF required for abduction, and in the peak SACP among the four PSRC tear statuses (49.8 ± 9.2 N, 0.39 ± 0.05 mPa [1/3 PSRC tear]; 49.3 ± 6.8 N, 0.40 ± 0.06 mPa [2/3 PSRC tear]; 51.6 ± 7.0 N, 0.44 ± 0.08 mPa [entire PSRC tear]), as well as intact statuses (48.3 ± 9.8 N, 0.40 ± 0.05 mPa). However, significant elevations in the peak MDF and peak SACP levels were observed among the four PSRC tear statuses and global RC tear (68.1 ± 9.3 N; 4.12 ± 1.50 mPa, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the absence of excess loading, the biomechanical function of the shoulder was not impaired by a simple PSRC tear. However, once the tear size reached the half superior portion of the humeral head, the humeral head migrated to the surface of the subacromion, and this action markedly decreased shoulder abduction function.

Relationship between the progression of posterosuperior rotator cuff tear size and shoulder abduction function: A cadaveric study via dynamic shoulder simulator.

Posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (PSRCT) is one of the most common shoulder disorders in elderly people's daily life; however, the biomechanical relationship between PSRCT and shoulder abduction function is still controversial. In this study, a total of twelve freshly frozen cadaveric shoulders were included and tested in five conditions: intact rotator cuff, 1/3 PSRCT, 2/3 PSRCT, entire PSRCT, and global RCT. In each condition, extra load (0%, 45%, and 90% failure load) was sequentially added to the distal humerus, and the function of the remaining rotator cuff was mainly evaluated via the middle deltoid force (MDF) required for abduction. It is found that the peak MDF is required for abduction did not differ among the three PSRCT conditions (1/3 PSRCT: 29.30 ± 5.03 N, p = 0.96; 2/3 PSRCT: 29.13 ± 9.09 N, p = 0.98; entire PSRCT: 28.85 ± 7.12 N, p = 0.90) and the intact condition (29.18 ± 4.99 N). However, the peak MDF significantly differed between the global RCT (76.27 ± 4.94 N, p < 0.01) and all PSRCT and intact conditions. Under 45% failure load, the MDF of the entire PSRCT and global tear conditions were significantly increased compared with another status. With the 90% failure load, only the 1/3 PSRCT condition maintained the same shoulder function as the intact rotator cuff. These biomechanical testing jointly suggested that the weight-bearing ability of the shoulder significantly decreased as PSRCT progressed.

Bankart Repair With Transferred Long Head of the Biceps Provides Better Biomechanical Effect Than Conjoined Tendon Transfer in Anterior Shoulder Instability With 20% Glenoid Defect.

PURPOSE: To examine the biomechanical differences between labral repair with transferred conjoined tendon and transferred long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) for anterior shoulder instability with 20% bone loss. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were tested in sequent 5 conditions: intact, 20% glenoid defect, Bankart repair, Bankart repair with transferred conjoined tendon (dynamic conjoined tendon sling, DCS), and with transferred LHBT (dynamic LHBT sling, DLS) at 60° of glenohumeral abduction and 60° of external rotation. The physiological glenohumeral joint load was created by forces applied to the rotator cuff, conjoined tendon, and LHBT. The glenohumeral compression force and range of motion were recorded before anteroinferior force application. The anterior, inferior, and total translations were measured with 20, 30, 40, and 50 N of anteroinferior force, respectively. RESULTS: Anteroinferior glenoid defect led to significant increase of humerus translation and decrease of glenohumeral compression force. DLS provided better resistance effect in both anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions than DCS under high loading condition (40 N, P =.03; 50 N, P <.01). Both DCS and DLS procedures could further restore glenohumeral compression force with Bankart repair (Bankart repair: 32.1 ± 4.0 N; DCS: 36.7 ± 3.2 N, P < .01; DLS: 35.8 ± 3.6 N, P =.03). No range of motion restrictions were observed relative to the normal shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Both the DLS and DCS techniques could reduce the anterior-inferior translation and partially restore the glenohumeral stability in anterior shoulder instability with 20% anteroinferior glenoid defect compared with Bankart repair. Under greater loading conditions, DLS provides better stability than DCS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Shoulder stability can be restored by DLS and DCS with low load. With greater shoulder stability requirements, DLS might be a better option than DCS for anterior shoulder instability with 20% bone loss.

Dynamic Double-Sling Augmentation Prevents Anteroinferior Translation for Recurrent Anteroinferior Shoulder Dislocation With 20% Glenoid Bone Loss: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the dynamic double-sling with single-sling augmentation using the conjoined tendon (CT) with 20% of an anteroinferior glenoid bone defect under the high loads in shoulders. METHODS: With the shoulder in 60° of glenohumeral abduction and 60° of external rotation, the 12 shoulders stability was tested sequentially in 5 conditions: intact, 20% glenoid bone loss, Bankart repair, single-sling augmentation with the CT, and double-sling augmentation with both the CT and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). The anteroinferior humeral head (HH) translation force of 20N, 30N, 40N, 50N, or 60N was applied to determine the shoulder stability in each condition. RESULTS: The total HH translation over 8.77 mm represented the anteroinferior shoulder instability (95% confidence interval of bone defect: 7.76-8.77 mm). A significant increase in anteroinferior HH translation was demonstrated after the creation of 20% glenoid bone defect under the 20N translational force (10.52 ± 0.71 mm). Structural failure after the Bankart repair and the single-sling augmentation under the 30N (9.84 ± 1.25 mm) and 40N (9.59 ± 0.66 mm) translational forces, respectively, were observed. The double-sling augmentation effectively prevented the anteroinferior HH translation under the translational force of less than 40N, and only half of the augmentation structure (8.25 ± 1.66 mm) had failed under the 50N translational forces. CONCLUSION: In the absence of any Hill-Sachs lesion and when tested at 60° abduction and external rotation in shoulders with 20% glenoid bone defects, at time-zero, the double-sling augmentation strategy could effectively prevent anteroinferior translation when compared with the Bankart repair or the single-sling augmentation technique under all magnitudes of the translational force in biomechanical simulation. Nevertheless, none of the constructs restored the HH translation to the normal intact state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double-sling augmentation technique may represent a reliable option for preventing anteroinferior translation.