One-year outcome of selective caries removal versus pulpotomy treatment of deep caries: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the outcome of SCR and Pulpotomy in teeth with deep caries extending at least 75% into dentine. METHODOLOGY: This two-armed, parallel-group, randomized, superiority trial included vital mature permanent teeth with deep primary or secondary caries diagnosed radiographically as being at least 75% into the thickness of dentine, without clinical signs of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis or radiographic evidence of a periapical lesion. Carious teeth were blindly allocated to receive either SCR or Pulpotomy using computer-generated randomized patient codes concealed in opaque envelopes. All teeth were reviewed clinically and radiographically at 6 months and 1 year post-treatment. Using a significance level of p < .05, the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare the outcome of SCR and Pulpotomy and to identify potential prognostic factors, respectively. RESULTS: In all, 58 teeth in the SCR group and 55 teeth in the pulpotomy group completed treatment, after excluding 6 teeth because they did not complete the allocated treatment and another due to severe periodontal disease. At one year, 57/58 (98.3%) teeth from the SCR group and 48/55 (87.3%) teeth from the Pulpotomy group were available for analysis. One tooth in the Pulpotomy group (2.1%) and eight teeth in the SCR group (14.0%) required the further intervention of root canal treatment (p < .05). There were no other significant prognostic factors for survival. Overall, 91.4% of teeth treated with either SCR or Pulpotomy survived without requiring further intervention over a period of one year. No other adverse events occurred over the review period. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Pulpotomy fares better than SCR in preserving the remaining pulp and periapical health. As a treatment modality, Pulpotomy carries greater cost outlay to patient and takes a longer time to complete treatment than SCR. Long-term follow-up is needed to study the pulpal and restorative outcomes of Pulpotomy and SCR.

Aerosol-generating dental procedures: a reappraisal of analysis methods and infection control measures.

BACKGROUND: Dental aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) have been associated with risk for transmitting infectious agents. However, existing infection control monitoring studies potentially underestimate the extent of contamination, due to methodological inadequacies. These studies employed settle plate methodology which only captures droplets that land on agar plates, but not those suspended in air. Furthermore, bacterial culture was used to determine the extent of contamination, without accounting for non-bacterial sources of contamination. AIMS: This study sought to bridge these gaps by establishing a monitoring protocol involving active aerosol sampling and analysis of two dental AGPs, root canal treatment (RCT) and scaling. METHODS: RCT and scaling were performed with standard aerosol mitigation precautions. Aerosols generated throughout each procedure were sampled using the air sampler device, while contamination of operatory fomites and personal protective equipment was sampled using surface swabs, before and post-treatment. The amount of contamination was quantified using bacterial culture and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assay. FINDINGS: RCT generated insignificant aerosol and splatter, supporting the infection control procedures' effectiveness. Conversely, scaling significantly increased the amount of aerosol and splatter. When comparing bacterial culture and ATP assay, the magnitude of contamination obtained with ATP assay was greater, suggesting that ATP assay may have detected additional contamination of human origin and bacteria that was not recovered by the culture conditions employed. CONCLUSIONS: This monitoring protocol is feasible in the dental setting and determines the extent of contamination generated during AGPs. This could be adopted in future studies to overcome the limitations of the existing literature.

Bacterial species associated with persistent apical periodontitis exert differential effects on osteogenic differentiation.

AIM: To determine if bacteria associated with persistent apical periodontitis induce species-specific pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in macrophages, and the effects of this species-specific microenvironment on osteogenic differentiation. METHODOLOGY: Macrophages were exposed to Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Treponema denticola or Tannerella forsythia, and levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß elicited were determined by immunoassay. Following treatment of MG-63 pre-osteoblasts with conditioned media from bacteria-exposed macrophages, osteogenic differentiation and viability of osteoblasts were analyzed by Alizarin Red Staining and MTS assay, respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way anova with the Tukey post-hoc test. Differences were considered to be significant if P < 0.05. RESULTS: Macrophages exposed to Gram-positive bacteria did not produce significant amounts of cytokines. F. nucleatum-challenged macrophages produced up to four-fold more TNF-α and IL-1ß compared to T. denticola or T. forsythia. Only conditioned media from macrophages treated with Gram-negative bacteria decreased mineralization and viability of osteoblasts. CONCLUSIONS: Gram-positive bacteria did not impact osteogenic differentiation and appeared innocuous. Gram-negative bacteria, in particular F. nucleatum elicited an enhanced pro-inflammatory response in macrophages, inhibited osteogenic differentiation and reduced cell viability. The findings suggest that the presence of this organism could potentially increase the severity of persistent apical periodontitis.

Multiple idiopathic cervical resorption: case report and discussion of management options.

AIM: To present a case of cervical root resorption affecting all teeth and resulting in multiple tooth loss. SUMMARY: A healthy 33-year-old Chinese male, with no contributory medical or family/social history, presented with generalized cervical root resorption. Lesions varied in severity amongst teeth and even involved an impacted third molar. All cervical root surfaces were affected and lesions often extended coronally, undermining enamel. CBCT demonstrated that the lesions were more extensive and more widely distributed than was seen using conventional radiography. Bone extended into many resorptive defects but without clinical evidence of ankylosis. Periodontal probing, pulp testing, percussion sound and mobility were within normal limits. Key learning points • Aetiology of the generalized idiopathic cervical root resorption is uncertain. • Management is complex, and options have included surgical exposure and restoration of affected sites, extraction and submergence of affected roots. • A staged approach involving early intervention with restoration of resorptive defects, followed by progressive extraction and replacement with implant-supported prostheses is recommended.